9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

US fabricated raid on bin Laden compound in Pakistan: Political analyst

Press TV has conducted an interview with James Fetzer, a philosopher and political commentator, to discuss the issue of the United States using drones in other countries.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/238468.html

The following is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Perhaps you can clarify this for us. First, let’s look at the line from the US on this. The US will now be allowed to target individuals found to be plotting to attack the US or American territory overseas even if US intelligence cannot identify the people by name. How do you explain the rationale behind this?

Fetzer: The whole situation is completely outrageous. It used to be a principle of American moral and political philosophy that it’s better to let ten guilty men go free than for one innocent person to suffer.

The whole line about al-Qaeda is completely fabricated. This was an entity created by the United States to resist the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden is well known to have been our man in the Middle East where a CIA agent even visited him in Dubai where he was undergoing treatment for dialysis.

Studies have shown that use of drones, because of the inability to discern precisely who the target is, properly costs 140 civilian deaths - innocent deaths - for every targeted insurgent. It’s a disgrace that the United States should be abdicating its responsibility.

It represents a grotesque violation of international law and the principles of jurisprudence rooted in the concept of ‘due process’: no man should be deprived of life, liberty or the pursuit of property without the opportunity to defend himself in a court of law.

While this is alleged to be a war context, the complete abdication of responsibility here is grotesque and stains the reputation of the United States.

Press TV: Please expand more about what [our other guest] Gordon Duff is saying there. It sounds like the US has to be somewhat in a perpetual state of war. I don’t quite understand why these signature air strikes now are being brought into the picture and announced officially, as Gordon Duff talked about, [with] different countries that the US is involved in. What is going on?

Fetzer: As Gordon Duff astutely observed, Osama bin Laden died on or about the 15th of December, 2001. He was buried in an unmarked grave in Afghanistan in accordance with Islamic tradition.

The allusions of politics extend, therefore, to the purported attack on the compound in Pakistan which was a way of relieving political pressures that were derived from Obama not having closed Guantanamo, having stationed troops in Pakistan and having his birth certificate being subjected to minute scrutiny which was exposing its fraudulent character.

All of that was taken off the front page by the staged fabricated attack on the compound where no one had ever seen Osama bin Laden. Indeed, how can you kill a man who died in 2001 - another time? The idea that he would be buried at sea in accordance to Muslim tradition was preposterous. That’s disrespectful to bodies which can be eaten by fish, sharks and other crustaceans.

It’s a shame that the United States has been reduced to one lie after another. We seem to be spending more time trying to defend lies than we are solving real problems in the world and this is, yet, one more example.

Press TV: So are they trying to remain in these countries that are using their drones? -We could add to the list Afghanistan, Pakistan, maybe a setup to becoming a [scene] where drones have been officially documented to fly over their airspace. So is that, maybe, a reason for the US to use these assassination drones?

Fetzer: The idea of a perpetual war seems to be necessary to keep the military industrial complex going. We didn’t derive the peace dividend that should have occurred when the Soviet Union collapsed.

But instead, we elaborated a phony, elusive, shadowy terrorist force to alliance ourselves against where we could conveniently bring about any action anytime we want - any terrorist event.

We have been complicit. Even the FBI has shown to have been involved in terrorist activities here in the United States.

So, we’re fabricating events in order to justify massive expenditures and to extend the power of the police state that the United States has become.

Press TV: I’m going to go back to the line that the US gave at the beginning of the program. Even if US intelligence cannot identify the people by name, another way of saying ‘collateral damage: civilians are going to be killed’; the UN, when is it going to act on this given the track record?

Fetzer: This represents a gross violation of human rights by any standards, certainly by that of the Declaration of Human Rights, by that of the US Constitution, by the Declaration of Independence.

I was so affected by the story of two young, beautiful teenage girls being followed by a drone, who looked back at it, laughed and giggled, which irritated the drone operator - so he took them out.

This kind of scenario is being replicated in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now no doubt even in Pakistan.

It’s outrageous. It’s a corruption and it’s a betrayal of every principle for which the United States is supposed to stand. It must end.

Views: 93

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes, this excerpt from your time on Press TV

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/28/duff-fetzer-on-press-tv-us-...

 

 

about drones, also with guests Gordon Duff and a person from CodePink organization it truly great.  So patriotic, the way I define it anyway.

 

Not wanting to be off topic in this thread, but since Gordon Duff refuses to post my brief comment on the VT comments area about this show on PressTV about drones, I will post it here.  (Beginning to think Gordon Duff is a big zero.)

 

The guest on the show from CodePink said 200 permits have been issued for entities to have drones but that 'we don't even know who those entities are.'  Well, yes we do know who has permits.  Here are two outstanding comprehensive articles about drones that are must see.

 

Is there a drone in your neighbourhood? Rise of spy planes exposed after FAA is forced to reveal 63 launch sites across U.S.

  • Unmanned spy planes are being launched from locations in 20 states and owners include the military and universities

By Julian Gavaghan

|

There are at least 63 active drone sites around the U.S, federal authorities have been forced to reveal following a landmark Freedom of Information lawsuit.

The unmanned planes – some of which may have been designed to kill terror suspects – are being launched from locations in 20 states.

Most of the active drones are deployed from military installations, enforcement agencies and border patrol teams, according to the Federal Aviation Authority.

Exposed: Location of sites where licences have been granted for the use of drones within the U.S.

Exposed: Location of sites where licences have been granted for the use of drones within the U.S. There are 63 active sites based in 20 states. Red flags show active sites and blue show those locations where licences have expired since 2006

But, astonishingly, 19 universities and colleges are also registered as owners of what are officially known as unmanned aerial vehicles."  snip...



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134376/Is-drone-neighbourh...

 

_______________

 

also

 

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/04/faa-releases-its-list-drone-c...

 

Defending your rights in the digital world
April 19, 2012 | By Jennifer Lynch

FAA Releases Lists of Drone Certificates—Many Questions Left Unanswered

View Map of Domestic Drone Authorizations in a larger map

This week the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) finally released its first round of records in response to EFF’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for information on the agency's drone authorization program. The agency says the two lists it released include the names of all public and private entities that have applied for authorizations to fly drones domestically. These lists—which include the Certificates of Authorizations (COAs), issued to public entities like police departments, and the Special Airworthiness Certificates (SACs), issued to private drone manufacturers—show for the first time who is authorized to fly drones in the United States.

snip...

Great interview Jim and Gordon!! So nice to see you back here, Jeannon. You were missed. Often posts with links take a while to post, as they review them. Yours is there now. Peace and Blessings to all...

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2022   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service