9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Dead Men Talking

Information

Dead Men Talking

We collect the most relevant evidence of government participation in the events of 9/11. Bring evidence here and discuss its truth and relevance!

Website: http://www.deanhartwell.com
Members: 7
Latest Activity: Jun 14, 2010

Read Dead Men Talking

This is the book that presents my case about 9/11

I would like to hear your thoughts.

The point of the book is to identify the best evidence of government conspiracy. I mention the Standard Operating Procedures of air defense and how they were not followed; I mention "blips" appearing on the screens of FAA employees and who had the authority and the power to put them there to confuse them; I mention warnings given to Bush Administration officials that were not followed. And a lot more.

I avoided the more controversial evidence such as what happened at the Pentagon. I feared that my thoughts on this subject and others like it would distract from the proof beyond a reasonable doubt that government agents acted on 9/11 to commit murder. If you tell a skeptic several ideas, it is a cinch they will attack the ideas with the least factual support and ignore the rest of what you say.

If you have thoughts about what hit the WTC 1 and 2 and the Pentagon and about cell phones, etc. please tell me.

Discussion Forum

Future Petitions to Ask People to Support New Investigation on 9/11

This group will collect the most relevant facts on the culprits of 9/11 to make it easy to put together new petitions and fact sheets.  It will also serve as the basis for essays which are especially…Continue

Tags: article, essay, investigation, facts, petition

Started by Dean Apr 11, 2010.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Dead Men Talking to add comments!

Comment by James H. Fetzer on June 3, 2010 at 11:42pm
These are two exceptional studies of the passenger lists, which bear all the signs of fabrication. This is an important contribution to 9/11 studies.
Comment by Dean on June 3, 2010 at 10:59pm
Here is a link that proves that the media used fictitious names on the passenger lists:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5Fg9Nw9YA&NR=1
Comment by Dean on May 27, 2010 at 7:06pm
I can't move on with any petition unless we can understand why the official theory re: the planes could be wrong. On the "whatzit" article, the author criticizes the late Holmgren and others for not identifying compression that takes place in "translating" content from one form of media to another. The authors shows the planes coming out clearly when the compression is reduced. Any ideas on this?
Comment by Dean on May 24, 2010 at 2:00pm
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit.html

Here is the opposing view to the link I put on this wall yesterday. Which point of view is more believable and why?
Comment by sandy rose on May 24, 2010 at 8:00am
oh yeah, this one is a goodie! thanks for posting this, Dean,
and again, lots of brownie points for being willing to check this
stuff out. i second your being interested in hearing what
everyone thinks. i think BUSTED! and a little sloppy on the job!
Comment by Dean on May 23, 2010 at 10:40pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBpTWYUgvcM

I am interested in hearing what everyone thinks about this video on youtube and the series of videos it belongs to.
Comment by sandy rose on May 22, 2010 at 2:42pm
thanks Sharon, tee vee fakery the same as what? it
gets confusing, as of course they intended. their whole
story was bogus. i haven't noticed any part that was true.
the first hit on wtc could have been real on the video, but
their story is fake, about hijackers, etc. some parts are
real, some are fake, i'm convinced, on the videos, but the
whole story of hijackers, etc. fake, made up crap, in my book.
good to hear from you, say more about what you think
if you wanna. it's confusing on purpose, it's not our fault! :)
Comment by sandy rose on May 22, 2010 at 2:36pm
yes on the article, Dean, and thanks for calling them liars!
Comment by sandy rose on May 22, 2010 at 1:56pm
hi Dean, oh yeah, i did see your flyer and like it. also like
the idea of a someone answering our questions, cause like
you said, basically all we get is the blah blah blah.
it would be interesting at least, and put them on the spot
also, where they need to be. they'd probably do whatever it
takes to avoid the question scenario. they flunk out at that one.
i have lost every shred of any hope of any confidence in
this so called government. what are they governing? they're
screwing the world up with alarming speed, they're trampling
our rights and messing with us thru the corrupt media, they
shrug it off when anyone mentions 9/11, act like WE're the
crazy ones, which we all know we're not..
not to mention, they're mass murderers, obomba included
i am sad to say.. and heartless bastards probably fits, too.
i kinda think we hafta go over their guilty heads to get
anywhere.... tho i'm not even sure anyone has the nuts to
take them on. i was greatly inspired when the ICC came
into the scene, in the midst of the bash horrors, but they're
piddling around and being no doubt threatened by the yoo
ess, etc. and so far haven't done a dang thing far's i can see.


i like your ideas and think they are worthy, and if you
can get any of these turdballs to give the actual people any
air time and feedback, power to ya.. thanks!
Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on May 22, 2010 at 7:59am
Lovely essay, especially the "hot" and "cold" part of the parent's gift.
 

Members (6)

 
 
 

© 2020   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service