9/11 Scholars Forum
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth_9853.html
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood
Earlier this year, Dr. Judy Wood put out her new book titled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11
Fortunately, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have recently made their position very clear on this matter regarding Directed Energy Weapon theories. A new article written by Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts shows many of the absurdities of Judy Wood's claims. The article is reproduced here, with some extra links I have added:
AE911Truth FAQ #6: What’s Your Assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis?
Written by Jonathan Cole, P.E., Richard Gage, AIA, and Gregg Roberts
(Editor's Note: We continue to make enhancements to this article as time permits, including supplying additional hyperlinks. The article should be finalized in a few days at the most, but we wanted to get something published sooner rather than later for the benefit of all those who have questions about Judy Wood's new book.)
Some have suggested that much of the structural steel of the World Trade Center skyscrapers was turned to dust, or “dustified” – a term used by Judy Wood, the primary proponent of this hypothesis – with some type of directed energy weapon (DEW). Some of the observations cited by Wood include the voluminous dust created during the Twin Towers’ destruction, the “craters” in WTC 5 and 6, “toasted” cars, and small holes in glass windows.
While Wood and AE911truth agree that the official story of an “inevitable” collapse by gravity alone is impossible because it conflicts with laws of physics, we completely differ on the mechanism of the destruction. Crucially, once there is proof and consensus that the official story violates elementary laws of physics, our major scientific task has been accomplished. The remaining task is the political challenge of mobilizing support for a legitimate investigation.
Of course the science of the collapse of the Towers and Building 7 can be advanced beyond the mere conclusion that the official story must be false. But it is imperative that anyone serious advancing understanding of the mechanisms of collapse hew closely to scientific methodology. This is crucial to earn the 9/11 movement the public respect it deserves, rather than to cast it into the role of perpetrating "junk science."
The scientific method requires us to look at all the available evidence and then assess various explanations for their ability to account for the evidence. At some point, the inferior explanations must be discarded if there is to be continued progress in an investigation, just as in pure science. It is our opinion that the DEW hypothesis is not just weak; it is not supported by the evidence at all. We provide only a general discussion here, referring the reader to references for a thorough understanding.
A Hypothesis in Search of Facts
One of the observations that seems to have motivated Wood to come up with her directed energy weapon hypothesis is that the debris pile at Ground Zero does not seem to be tall enough to contain enough steel to equal what was in the Twin Towers before they came down. She departs from verifiable fact quite early with this claim. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, performed the first technical review of what brought down the Twin Towers and WTC 7. Even in its report, FEMA acknowledges (inconveniently for the official story, which cannot account for this fine destruction of the Twin Towers) that roughly 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Indeed, the entire plaza was covered with steel pieces and assemblies. Some of the structural steel was thrown as far away as the Winter Gardens.
Given all this, there is no reason to expect a taller debris pile at Ground Zero than the photographs show. Wood's belief that some of the steel must have been turned into dust rests on a completely spuriously interpretation of the visual evidence. Her hypothesis is an attempt to solve a nonexistent problem. As we will show, it can be sustained only by additional poor analysis and leaps of faith, just like the official explanation.
Read more at http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth_9853.html
Thoth II
The A & E people are completely right that DEW hypothesis is not just weak, and not supported by evidence.
However, they are only half right: they have evidence for thermite plus Chuck is supplying ample additional details about the evidence of thermite. But the primary explosive force, to , for example, supply the fracture energy (talked about by Frank Greening) to pulverize the concrete into 60 micron dust plus the holes throughout the WTC complex, came from mini nukes.
I don't believe they are listening enough to Chuck.
May 13, 2011
jane doe
Thoth II, I suspect with your name (Aleister Crowley reference), you must be very familiar with the Aleister Crowley followers involved in the 911 mega ritual, right? You are aware of the occult involvement in 911 and that Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti are Crowley's daughters. I also assume that you know all the numerical references on 911 are occultist/masonic symbols of the mega ritual of 911, and that the media's is complicit in all 911 CRIME. It is all plan of the Illuminati, referenced in the INWO--Illuminati New World Order game published by Steve Jackson. Am I right in assuming that? You must know that infiltrators are easily identified by their logons. Just saying!
I also assume that you are part of the Sock Puppet program of Operation Earnest Voice which the military has defined to set out to spread American propaganda. The fact that you and other paid posters are blatant about your occult symbols and Crowley references. Who doesn't know Thoth is a Crowley god?
Operation Earnest Voice (became a real program once it was learned that the govt is paying posters to post on the Internet) was allocated $200 million in March 2011. $2.67 million going specifically to Ntrepid based in San Diego. I am convince that Mike and John Cappelletti are involved in some level. That being John's home base. I also assume that subcontracting of military Internet propaganda is going to Ann Cappelletti's groups of paid posters, What I do know is that Ann has been running the groups of paid posters posting propaganda since 2001. Nephew George gave her that job. I have a feeling that soldiers are not doing the posting. I will bet the program is a mercenary project. 1/2 of the paid posters are witches/witches-in-training, the other 1/2 are punks (many spell English horribly). Since many can't spell English, who would suspect that any of them have other languages, unless of course, they are foreign mercenaries. Which is probably the case. OEV operation was reported to not be working in the U.S. but in other countries run by soldiers. Another lie by the perps in the military anf liars of the U.S. govt.
You must also know that John & Mike Cappelletti's demoliton company (cousins of George Bush) got the job of gutting the towers, and planting nanothermite and timing devices for the 911 implosions. I understand they were also involved in imploding the Murrah Bldg, Minneapolis/St. Paul Bridge, setting fires in the Deutsche Bank Bldg in NYC and probably arson fires in So. California. I had heard Mike & John were starting up a demolition company in So. California. It crossed my mind that they may be involved in Ntrepid, the company that got the $2.67 million from Operation Earnest Voice.
May 26, 2011
jane doe
I point out that the Illuminati New World Order card game card for the twin towers is labelled Terrorist Nukes.
This was a destraction from the truth of the Towers being imploded.
The debris pile for 2 110 floors only rose to the equivalent of 3 floors, if that.
Robert Segal's photos from 9/14-16/2001 show very little debris anywhere in the area which was closed off to everyone. Sure steel girders were ejected in all directions but furniture, all artwork, valuable historical photos, phones, door knobs, carpeting, walls, ceiling, floors were removed during the pre-demolition phase of gutting.
Gutting is a necessary step in demolition. I prevents objects from becoming projectiles.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070817102139/photo.net/photodb/folder?...
Segal: WTC Ground Zero, 9/14 - 9/16/2001
stevenwarran blogspot has a link to these photos. http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2010/12/robert-segal-masayuki-naga...
stevenwarran's blogspots (4) are valuable references for 911 information.
Hollow Towers videos show empty floors of WTC 2.
911 - hohle Gebäude - Teil 1
http://youtu.be/Xz4LYQUjUdw
911 - hohle Gebäude - Teil 2 Evidence of Predemolition
http://youtu.be/_mZt8JagXIA
911 - hohle Gebäude - Teil 3
http://youtu.be/uILPWPO_7cE
May 26, 2011
jane doe
The link to Robert Segal's WTC Ground Zero, 9/14 - 9/16/2001 is archived, has to be retrieved from the WAYBACKmachine. It may take a while or you can click the Impatient? link on the wayback page to speed up the process.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070817102139/photo.net/photodb/folder?...
These photos prove that the images generated on TV and in print were manipulated with extra STUFF.
May 26, 2011
Thoth II
Jane,
actually, I just picked "Thoth" out of a book talking about philosophers because I believe in Jim's approach to knowledge: critical thinking, avoidance of logical fallacies, and scientific method, particularly abductivism which seems to be the best way to scientific "truth". I don't really belong to any society except my own thinking process applying these principles, I am quite "boring" and straightforward actually.
As for if the occult and numerology and all that are involved in 911, I would say definitely yes. The secret societies who rule this world are very sick puppies and if only the average citizen would reason like I do, this handful of elites would be overturned tomorrow. But I am American, and I am getting disgusted with my fellow Americans, they let the JFK thing go by without demanding a serious investigation, as well as buying Bush/Obama nonsense, they drown themselves in cables TV, football games, and beer , and the "news" is a joke, not serious discourse of a healthy country. I was born in the 1950s and in my opinion after JFK, this country fell apart. I guess that is about the theme of my thinking these days.
May 26, 2011
jane doe
T II, interesting.
As for the Egyptian gods. I am biased against them. It seems all too much as if it is the worship of lucifer, The Ten Commandments movie w Charles Heston left a lasting disdain with me, as did the Indiana Jones movies.
I was 12 when Kennedy was shot. It was devastating for me for a while. I never trusted LBJ-never stand the Texas swagger. I secretly blamed Johnson. Growing up in Pennsylvania seemed as if we lived in another country separate from a real life that was in another world. It always seemed then that life was some place else where I would go when I was older. I digress.
I agree with you regarding getting disgusted with my "fellow" Americans, moreso, I am disgusted with my siblings and cousins who live in a world of make believe and lies. They chatter on about what people own or who they know. It is all about "me, me, me."
I was going to relate a personal story, but it seems so petty, I can't be bothered. We may have similar experiences since we are from the same generation. You do recognize the occult influence of our lives in the last 20 years.
May 27, 2011