thanks for response, but I really think you are straw manning the argument here to make it seem less believable. They knew the amount of concrete, fracture energy, number of nukes, energy per nuke, etc., and they could have fine tuned it quite well. It is all engineering here, not science.
Super, let's have it out. This will be a heck of debate on real deal feb. 6. By the way, people who know the history of science relish this, this is how science always progresses, from wave vs. particle theory of light, to Einstein vs. Bohr, and on and on it goes.
I think Morgan has been using straw men and hyperbole, not science, and the point by point should eventually show this up.
Shallel Octavia
In interest of correctness, the band was called Pilot.
I don't see a fit for nukes either. Obviously I agree with Greening and Morgan on this.
Welding material worshippers? That's rich!
I
Jan 16, 2012
Thoth II
Morgan,
thanks for response, but I really think you are straw manning the argument here to make it seem less believable. They knew the amount of concrete, fracture energy, number of nukes, energy per nuke, etc., and they could have fine tuned it quite well. It is all engineering here, not science.
Jan 17, 2012
Thoth II
Super, let's have it out. This will be a heck of debate on real deal feb. 6. By the way, people who know the history of science relish this, this is how science always progresses, from wave vs. particle theory of light, to Einstein vs. Bohr, and on and on it goes.
I think Morgan has been using straw men and hyperbole, not science, and the point by point should eventually show this up.
Jan 19, 2012