Holography was invented in 1947 and has been continually improved until
about 20 years ago when ‘they’ were able to project a solid looking, 3 dimensional,
moveable object of any size or…
which looked like the one in the 50-or-so videos could
have achieved that speed, for a period of about ten seconds, at that
altitude, following a rapid descent of 4,600 per minute, from an altitude
of over 20,000 feet, on a very fine day, with only a slight headwind."
He seems like he is special pleading and grasping at straws. This idea he quotes is absurd and almost as bad as those absurd things the Popular Mechanics article tried to foist on the public about the towers.
First of all, I don't necessarily agree with the science. I think John Lear has explained this ad nauseum that flying at the speed required is impossible aerodynamically. Secondly, how could they even pull off such a maneuver. I never heard any eyewitness reports about such a ridiculous maneuver?
And then, Lawson is totally ignorant of physics. I say to him, look at the interaction of the planes with the buildings in those videos. They are so very obviously cartoons that to me his believing them is as ridiculous as him believing a Road Runner cartoon, I really mean it.…
it. So I'm just watching Part
3 of "John Lear tells all" on youtube, and he says those exact words, (referring to aliens) and I had never seen this video before. I always take note of these synchronous things in my life. Intuition is a key we need to heed.
Anyway, the video is worth a watch if you have the time and interest in the hidden world of compartmentalized secret operations. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj-HzHi3dF0&feature=channel…
crete per floor. As a diagram from killtown display--visit http://killtown.911review.org/wtc-gallery.html--Flight 175 intersected with eight of those floors. Anyone who thinks the plane should not have crumpled and broken apart--with massive debris falling to the ground, precisely as John Lear describes--does not understand the structure of the towers. Not only did no deceleration occur, but--by counting frames, as Joe Keith has recommended--it is possible to determine that the speed of the plane shown in the video passes though its entire length into the building as effortlessly as it passes through its entire length through air. Sorry, but you are off-base on this one. And are you unaware of the damage to planes caused by impacts with tiny birds weighing only a few ounces? I think you need to reconsider and think this matter through. John is completely right about this and you are wrong.…