9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on April 27, 2011 at 5:58am
I really wish Judy hadn't gone on this DEW binge, because it is totally wrong, and now she's going to be spreading her misinformation to ten million listeners on coast to coast.  911 truth doesn't need this, we need your rock solid interpretations based on chemistry and physics.
Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on April 27, 2011 at 12:49am

This evidence and other evidence I have reviewed, based to a large extent on Dr. Judy's photographic evidence from her website and from her new 911 book, is IMO, rock solid, all interpretations of the date being logically logical and most believable, with no hidden nor unknown variables as in Dr. Judy's DEWs and her Hutchison Field Effects.

The world need to see this most strong evidence that conflicts most strongly with NIST's politically determined outcome that is supposed to be an Investagory Report without bias that favors the USA Government and its rouge criminals.

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service