WTC 7 massive Thermatting of very thick steel columns as prep for Controlled Demolition

Comment

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on February 16, 2013 at 2:01am

Charles J. Boldwyn says:
Dr. Judy Wood appears to have possibly teamed up with Mark Roberts, a primary "NIST" & "OCT" supporter/debunker, as she is promoting his "no explosives possibility whatsoever" video on her book's site. She now has multiple videos for each of her more than 20 chapters.

What Judy calls steel & concrete & other mechanically based (not Chemically based) "DUSTIFICATION" - is really the instantaneous, physical-chemical boiling of steel into iron microspheres & white Aluminum Oxide rapidly and forcefully expanding vapors and boiling of concrete into silica microspheres & the vaporized water contained within the concrete's set structure & composition, all going through heating-up phase-transitions from solids to liquids to vapors and most, most rapidly cooling down
phase-transitions, from vapors to spherically shaped, via surface tension formed liquid particles to spherically shaped solid particles in forming the final dust compositions, all within a fraction of a second. That is what the fuming from the exploding & falling steel & concrete and other Tower components, toilets, & people is all about from a professional hard core physics & chemistry Instructor's point of view.

One could say dustification occurred, but steel, irregularly shaped particles were not the result that Dr. Wood's physical or mechanical mode demands & absolutely requires. None, no "steel" particals were found in any dust samples. Only "IRON" and "SILICA" microspheres and red/grey thermite particles were found in all, every dust sample analyzed.

This represents the total debunking of Dr. Judy Wood's DEWs "DUSTIFICATION" of the WTC Complex Hypothesis, the most central basis for her Theory.

Think about it is terms of what you all learned in Junior High Thermodynamics & Phase Transitions:

Solids > Liquids > Vapors > spherical Liquid Particles > Spherical Solid Particles

That is a physical-chemical, Thermodynamically based, Scientific Method based explanation...

I rest my Physical Science Methologically based case against Dr. Woods pseudo-scientific, non Scientific Method based case in which no "STEEL" dustification particles were found in even one, any samples analyzed via microscopic and other physical & chemical analytical testing methods...

There is no possible come-back reply available for Dr. Judy Wood or any of the Groupie, Blind-Faith Disciples and Adherents...

Please respond to this, Dr. Judy or Petie Santilli or Andrew Johnson or John Hutchison or Jesse Ventura or any real credentialed scientists who support her, Dr. Judy Wood...

Chuck Boldwyn

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on August 18, 2012 at 5:06pm

The Smoke, IMO, was coming from inside WTC-7 for a very long time, not from the other towers. For me that is a no-brainer. It is coming out in jets of force, not a casual accumulation from the Twin Towers. The air is nearly clear except for vigorously spewing smoke clouds coming from WTC-7.

In seriously considering your explanation, it make no sense to me, visually, none. You are entitled to your own opinion.

Of course, with enough explosives the Tower could be brought down, but would make great, great noise cutting through the very thick columns of WTC-7. Thinning the columns out would allow for much less explosive and less noise.

Really, your suggestion goes no where with me...sorry, we just do not see it the same.

Comment by Shallel Octavia on August 18, 2012 at 4:16pm

On the contrary, Chuck, I have been suspicious that WTC7 was the source of the white and grey smoke since Judy suggested years ago that this was it's turn to "lather up". With all the dust from the Towers suspended in the air, the airflow could make it appear to come from the building, when it actually was being concentrated on the leeward side of the building. WTC7, though taller and requiring more precision, appeared to be a standard CD. They don't need to soften a building with thermite to demo it with explosives. It would be conjecture, but I have often thought that it appeared to drop in a pre-tunneled-out hole under the building, which would explain the 2.5 second fall with absolutely no resistance. 

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on August 17, 2012 at 6:37am

Are you suggesting that DEWs may be doing this? How?

Is it just a mystery? Blind Faith acceptance?????

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on August 17, 2012 at 6:35am

What is destroying it, other that Thermate?

Comment by Shallel Octavia on August 17, 2012 at 5:38am

Here's one: It's dust from the Tower's destruction.

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on August 11, 2012 at 5:16pm

How can this ever be explained by non-provable, not-existent DEWs. Where is the energy source. Where are the visible beams or whatever of energy. It like believing in ghosts. What mechanism causes only one side to fume.

What is the composition of the fumes? Judy has never talked about that issue.

Many things Judy has not explained, can not explain, only spewing vauge ideas, guesses, suggestions, speculations...