GORDON DUFF:  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/

DON FOX, ED WARD MD, JEFF PRAGER: …

Joe Olson is a registered professional civil engineer with a background in structural. Several times he confirmed that no real plane could have entered either building, so I am puzzled that anyone would think differently. He gave many reasons why this could not have been done with conventional explosives and nanothermite, which is the A&E position, and why Judy Wood's DEW hypothesis cannot explain all of the data, including the USGS dust samples, the massive chunks of the building being…

DIMITRI KHALEZOV / GEORGE MAPP  Bangkok: http://skypotrol.net/2011/02/05/reality-is-stranger-than-fiction-dimitri-khalezov-discusses-911-with-george-mapp-in-bangkok/

JIM DEAN  Veterans Today:  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/11/the-day-the-world-fell-down-9-11-was-a-nuclear-attack/

IAN GREENHALGH  Veterans Today:  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/18/slam-dunk-most-classified-911-revealed/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/28/2-2-israel-nuked-the-wtc-on-911/

By Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer)

 

“[I]f New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used have to have been Israeli….[N]o alternative explanation is reasonable.”–Jim Fetzer

 …

http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm  ,,,,  Although I can't understand Dr Ward's position on the no plane

thing, he has much good info on the nuke issue. 

Submitted on 2013/05/11 at 7:04 am on VETERANS TODAY:

When you stop questioning and think you know the answer, SCIENCE STOPS.

When your pet theory becomes “Mystery Solved” Science is dead in the gutter.

There was NO incandescence; your proposal of nukes (8 million degrees) is therefore WRONG.

MY RESPONSE ON VETERANS TODAY AT 8:32 am on 2013/05/11:

Well, Shallel, I think you have missed some of the finer points about the use of these kinds of nukes, which I…

Anonymous Physicist :  .... http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2011/09/further-thoughts-on-radiation-readings.html  ....  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-china-syndrome-came-to-new-york.html

Farewell to DEWs (from page 111 of comments on my 5-star review of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?):

Your post, in reply to an earlier post on Nov 9, 2012 5:22:42 PM PST

Last edited by you 12 hours ago

James H. Fetzer says:

Childishness and immaturity appear to be all-pervasive among the followers of the Judy Wood cult. I wish it were not so, but the evidence is overwhelming. Here I have posted a 5-STAR REVIEW and done my best to give her credit for what she…

I just came across this, even though it's old. Mr Khalezov explains how the underground nuke would be narrowly focused upwards, which will account for little damage to the tub. Notice where he says there would be little noise and some ground

shaking. Also notice the countdown from the ground shake until the fireball erupts under the top section.  ,,,, …

Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson & Deanna Spingola:  "9/11 Truth Perception Management", 9 April 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9yM1MSY0ow

Am I wrong to think that this is a sloppy and irresponsible attack on Jeff Prager and me?  Your thoughts.

For an interview with Jeff Prager,

Wednesday, April 11, 2012…

I'm no physicist, but I think the appearance of radionuclides at Ground Zero is proof positive of the use of nukes on 9/11.

There was probably some combination of explosives and thermite , along with an underground nuke used to take down the towers.  Hopefully Chuck can shed some light on the radionuclide evidence during his debate with Morgan  Feb 6

on the Real Deal with Dr Fetzer moderating  .... woohoo!   ps. The first USGS link has a graph showing high strontium.

The…

Morgan: After looking for almost a day, I'm sorry to say I can't find links to radionuclides in dust samples from both

UC Davis and Columbia.  I think the links have been taken down or something. It looks like the thermite gang has taken over at UC Davis, Columbia,NYU,and Rutgers.  The link to William Tahil's article is: ....

http:// www.nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Sample.pdf  ....  Some more pertinent links are: …

I don't remember seeing this discussion on top down fusion-type mini nukes before.  The comments at the end are worth the

read.  It does seem as though the floors are turning to dust in groups of 8 or 10 at a time, and cascading down over the next

exploding group , etc,etc  ......   I stick with the mini nuke idea due to the enormous energy required to instantly pulverize

several acres of concrete with each explosion:  .... …