9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

http://www.septembercoup.com/911.htm  Check this out.  What I have read so far is completely brilliant!

How Did The WTC Towers Fall So Easily?
Melting 110-Stories of Steel and Concrete in just 57 Minutes
How did three huge skyscrapers implode within :10 seconds or less?

WTC 7 Destruction, Madrid Fire Are Keys To Unraveling 9/11

By Tim Watts

A Basic Understanding

Despite the differing opinions and countless theories which have been discussed and vehemently argued over concerning 9/11, one thing is painfully clear, this event was very well planned, with skilled military precision and strategic execution. This was a daring assault of monolithic proportions, outrageous in its temerity. No matter who was responsible, it was undeniably an orchestrated conspiracy. That much is fact.

Whoever was behind the planning was certainly no rookie. Clearly there was big money behind the operation, but more importantly, there was quite obviously a very high degree of skilled intelligence involved. By that, I am referring to alphabet state intel.

Whether that intel was foreign military or state sponsored, or merely a rogue splinter faction, it was indeed a valuable key in the success of the 9/11 attacks, an event which has become the primary catalyst of constitutional change for the United States, but also the pretext for war in the middle-east and North Africa.

The sad, perverse irony in all of this is that the United States claims to be bringing democracy to the many countries we've invaded, all the while it's being taken from us here at home.

The epic horror and cold brutality of this disaster, brought immediate public outcry, as well as a united grief and an outflow of compassion that did briefly unify the people momentarily, however, in just a short amount of time this infamous event has now become a contentious boiling point for many in the international community, while at the same time forming an indisputable divide among Americans.

Where We Are Now

Clearly the most acrimonious division has formed among the people of the United States. You either believe the government theory or you don't. If you should choose to recognize an alternative theory for 9/11, contrary to the official version, you are the one that is labeled as the conspiracy theorist, even though the government's version is perhaps much harder to believe than many of the alternative explanations.

There are still some who are, for whatever reason, either ambivalent or indifferent on the issue, however, the overall mass perceptions that exist today appear to be firmly entrenched and thus have become quite divisive. Many of these perceptions have been manufactured and nurtured by a non-inquisitive media that complicitly parrots the official government version. Those who resist that narrative are those who have explored alternative media and performed independent research on their own. It essentially comes down to coerced opinions versus learned opinions.

There are essentially three primary camps of thought that are being argued about regarding the 9/11 issue:

  • The 9/11 plot that totally defeated numerous airport security checks, World Trade Center security & surveillance systems, FBI and CIA intelligence services, all active NORAD military defense measures, as well as local built in Pentagon defense mechanisms... was meticulously coordinated and executed by Osama bin Laden and his band of Al Qaeda terrorists. This is the DKIWH theory, Didn't Know It Would Happen.  

  • The 9/11 attacks were learned of by some U.S. officials who were warned early on by intel from many countries, but who chose instead to sit on that information, using the opportunity as a new Pearl Harbor, in order to engage in preemptive wars of aggression in the middle-east and North Africa, by being complicit regarding the attacks, if not odiously helping to facilitate them in order to justify their wars of imperialism. This is the LIHOP theory, Let It Happen On Purpose. 

  • The 9/11 event was orchestrated and deliberately engineered solely by rogue government intelligence services, using the the alleged hijackers as mere patsies in the plot. The impetus for such a false flag operation include the spoils from scenario two, but with the primary objective being the enactment of a world-wide police state, the dissolution of the United States, and the emergence of the long planned new world order. This is the MIHOP theory, Made It Happen On Purpose.

Out of the three outlined scenarios above, there appear to be two distinctive theories that emerge. One, that the U.S. government was innocently or ignorantly caught by surprise and totally bungled the defense of the country. The other is, whether exploited or heinously engineered, a rogue faction of our government explicitly used the event for its own nefarious agenda.

That's about as mixed as you can get on the topic, and that's clearly not a good thing for getting at the truth. As a result, this has divided people into two camps, those that naively trust and believe the government explanation of 9/11, versus those who have methodically explored the evidence and do not believe the official story.

From an analytical point of view, one thing is obvious in looking at these two divided factions; one of the two groups has been exposed to both sides of the story, while one absolutely refuses to look.

As a result of this dichotomous contrast and its resulting contentious debate, both sides vehemently resist the other, if not wholeheartedly resent the other. This contention, along with its deeply impassioned emotion, is often rooted with a strong patriotic underscore from both sides, making the issue quite divisive and socially volatile.

So the question is, how do we move on from where we are now?

We were all shown those awful events that day, repeatedly, as they played over and over again on our televisions. Each and every one of us saw with our own eyes the catastrophic events as they unfolded that day, albeit through a construed media lens.

Like everything else in life, our current perceptions of 9/11 have been carefully formed and coerced, if not outright manipulated, through an openly gullible trust of our corporate news media. We all saw the attacks with our own eyes, yet we have continually been bombarded by a complicit media to buy into an official story that arguably has more glaring holes and inadequacies than any of the so-called conspiracy theories. It is often argued that the real conspiracy theory is the government's official version.

The government wants you to believe: That 19 men, divided into four groups, not armed with guns or explosives, but with mere simple box-cutters, were able to bypass security at three major airports, overwhelm the crew and passengers of four airplanes despite being greatly outnumbered, fly the planes with little or no piloting skills, easily defeating well structured long standing U.S. air defense systems, skillfully steering three of the mammoth jetliners unabated into their designated targets, crumbling the twin towers in a near free fall fashion into their own footprints in ten seconds or less, while also striking the Pentagon, the most secure structure within the most guarded airspace in the entire world, which was somehow left undefended, even after declaring that America was already under attack over half an hour (:34 minutes), before it was hit by a plane that had its transponder off for :41 minutes! There was no intercept of that obvious hijack, nor either of the New York flights which had transponders off for :26 and :17 minutes respectively. The military tried to muster an air defense, but just couldn't get there in time.

Those searching for a more reasoned explanation suggest: That a rogue group of high ranking government individuals, with complete control and unfettered access to Federal aviation systems and U.S. military operations, either exploited an uncovered terrorist plot, or engineered a false flag operation of their own, to attack symbolic targets in the country, all of which held beneficial side gain to U.S. officials from either their substantial wealth resources, or else crucial incriminating records that needed to be destroyed, all conveniently contained within the targets, all the while initiating an environment of fear and panic that could be used to consolidate government power through the restriction of rights, while enabling an excuse for unprovoked wars that immediately benefit the military industrial complex, the corporate elite, and the PNAC (Project for a New American Century), the latter which penned a document in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses,"  which openly talked of a new Pearl Harbor in order to facilitate its agenda.

While both plots may be hard to conceive, the fact of the matter is, the last one outlined is arguably much easier to achieve, due to the overwhelming number of PNAC members that were strategically positioned in key government seats of power. A neo-con mechanism was clearly enabled within the Bush-Cheney administration that possessed the ability to implement strategy and achieve the goals set forth by the PNAC. (See more on the PNAC's access to power further in this article.)

Some are understandably scared to look at an alternative theory, afraid of having their world upset with a national revelation too ugly for them to personally bare, or fearful of being denounced as "being against us," thus being accused of not supporting the country, but for others, a search for the truth is the only recourse in dealing with an event of such horrific destruction and cold-blooded mass murder.

Never being one to wait for an epiphany from the media, I began this exploration in search of answers that every single American has the right to know. What really happened on September 11th, 2001 that caused our politicians to change the world around us so much?

More at http://www.septembercoup.com/911.htm

Views: 486


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Shallel Octavia on January 9, 2012 at 1:07am
Well said, Jeannon, this technology to harness what I call the Energy of the Vacuum [10^92 dynes/cc - read as HUGE], is concealed at all costs. It is not in the interest of our controllers to allow us off the leash of fossil fuels and nuclear reactors as their intent is the destruction of life through the most cruel, slow torture of the entire ecosystem.

The fact is that steel falling was somehow turned to ash in plain view with no incandescent temperatures. This is easily seen in the slow motion footage shown in the Judy Wood Interview: http://911scholars.ning.com/video/where-did-the-towers-go-dr-judy-w...
If this falling steel is being destroyed in midair by some sort of exotic nuclear reaction, it is nuclear reaction that is occurring at less than incandescent temperatures.

I look forward to hearing a fellow EE on the Real Deal, thanks for the Heads-up, Jim. I suggest he review the footage [at 4:11] in the above video. Also the footage of the relatively undamaged first sub basement level @11:42 is proof 500,000 tons of material did not land as macro sized debris. (The undamaged "bathtub" is also proof of this.)
I also recommend studying Nassim Haramein's work at http://theresonanceproject.org/ He has done extensive work on the subject of Vacuum Energy. Also relevant is the work of Walter Russell who achieved transmutation of elements in 1917.
Comment by Jeannon Kralj on January 8, 2012 at 5:32pm

Tesla was a genius.  No doubt about that.  I understand the FBI or some government agency, upon his death, went in to his living place and stole everything.  I probably could find that article somewhere but won't look now. 

Supposedly one of the things that was taken from his hotel room was a notebook about a "death beam."



“This death beam, Dr. Tesla said, will operate silently but effectively at distances as far as a telescope could see an object on the ground and as far as the curvature of the earth would permit it.  It will be invisible and will leave no marks behind it beyond evidence of destruction.  An army of one million dead annihilated in an instant, he said, would never reveal, could not reveal even under the most powerful microscope just what catastrophe had caused its destruction.” “This death beam, Dr. Tesla said, will operate silently but effectively at distances as far as a telescope could see an object on the ground and as far as the curvature of the earth would permit it.  It will be invisible and will leave no marks behind it beyond evidence of destruction.  An army of one million dead annihilated in an instant, he said, would never reveal, could not reveal even under the most powerful microscope just what catastrophe had caused its destruction.”


I can see where it may be possible for infinite free energy technology to exist and that "the government" has every interest in concealing that information.  I do not know if Tesla's material would be key to that technology but that seems plausible too.

I can also imagine that there are many physicists who are totally controlled by the powers that be and if they like breathing, they do not speak about certain things.


Comment by Thoth II on January 8, 2012 at 4:47pm

“He was an absolute genius,” Dennis Papadopoulos, a physicist at the University of Maryland, said in an interview. “He conceived of things in 1900 that it took us 50 or 60 years to understand. But he did not appreciate dissipation. You can’t start putting a lot of power” into an antenna and expect the energy to travel long distances without great diminution."


Background article on Tesla's failed plan to beam electrical power over radio waves.

Comment by James H. Fetzer on January 8, 2012 at 12:30pm

I think these remarks by Thoth II are right on the mark.  I was so impressed by the way this article was set up that, on the basis of reading its initial sections, I wanted to share it. Given the quality of the discussion it has generated, I think that was a very good idea.  I will be featuring a guy with a background in EE on Monday on "The Real Deal" and we are going to be discussing these very issues.  I will recommend that he review this thread before the show.  That can be heard on http://revereradio.net from 5-7 PM/CT on Monday, 9 January.

Comment by Thoth II on January 8, 2012 at 10:35am


yes, I've heard about that.  However, the problem is, she did not develop this in a scientific manner.  What I'm saying is that a 10 year old could think of a correlation between any two things and say they are related.  To prove this, she would have to do much, much more work on it to establish the link between Hurricane Erin and 911.

I myself have a good hunch about what is going on with Judy Wood.  She is the master of the "data set", gathering the data in her book, the experts have lauded it.  However, the EXPLANATION is a totally different job, and she does not necessarily own the market on that at all.  She like everyone develops hypotheses, and hers I heard her say she did research earlier in life on reflection of light which led her to DEW.  I believe she then built this hunch up to a full blown H, but never adequately developed it.  She is now behaving badly and just trying to save face by twisting everything to fit her H instead of the other way around.  I believe both the Hurricane Erin and the Hutch stuff is in this category, she is just throwing it out there to see if people will buy it without developing it scientifically, I believe she is being intellectually dishonest now.

Comment by Jeannon Kralj on January 8, 2012 at 10:23am

I am certainly out of my depth in commenting on possible power sources for DEWs, however that never stopped me one little bit.

If I interepreted correctly and read between the lines correctly, Dr. Wood's information about Hurricane Erin might be a possible source of the energy.  She commented on a radio show one time that she could coneptualize a hurricane vortex as a Tesla coil.

Comment by Thoth II on January 8, 2012 at 9:37am


 On being able to

discount exotic DEWs, I have trouble with where the power source for such a device would come from. If it is a

beam from the sky:  you would either have to direct the sun with a mirror type deal, focus HAARP on a very small spot, or set off a nuke in the sky to run a laser or something pointed down at the buildings.  I don't see any of that happening. "

you are right on.  That is the problem, the DEWs are good for relatively small scale operations, but not for large scale.  Recall the history of the debate in EE (electrical engineering) between Tesla and proponents of electrical power transmission by copper wire.  Tesla wanted to send power in the atmosphere via electromagnetic radiation but this was impractical.  To dustify the towers with DEW would not be practical for the reasons you cite plus power transmission via EM radiation is just too inefficient.

However, the military has gadzillions of exotic types of mini nukes they've classified and have been brewing up since 1943.  God knows those would have enough power, look what a big nuke did to Nagasaki.

Comment by James H. Fetzer on January 7, 2012 at 11:34pm

Well, the comments here are excellent.  When I actually read this article, I will see if I agree or disagree.  So I hope Jeannon will not be too disappointed in me.  I liked the way it was set up, but that does not mean that I think he has it right. Shallel has pointed toward the most promising explanation with which I am familiar:  "New Bombs and War Crimes in Fallujah", Veterans Today.  Sorry I don't always real entire articles before posting.

Comment by Danny White on January 7, 2012 at 3:57pm

Dr Fetzer: I appreciate Mr Deets approach to getting at a solution. It's a good way to double check your reasoning on the method used. It only takes one technology set to make a difference  (radionuclides), but you can still be sure you haven't forgotten something. The idea of keeping an open mind is always a

good idea. I'm with you on thinking bldg 7 was a classic demolition, with conventional explosives.  If he is saying bldg 7 was a nuclear device,

it's new to me.  I don't think there was a crater under bldg 7, like under 1 and 2.  It seems as though they have all kinds of new little micro-nukes, so who knows? Something pretty powerful chewed up bldg 7 for sure. It was

supposed to have been the strongest steel and concrete building ever built,  to support itself over the power sub-station. I need to do some more research on this bldg 7 nuke thing before I'm convinced. On being able to

discount exotic DEWs, I have trouble with where the power source for such a device would come from. If it is a

beam from the sky:  you would either have to direct the sun with a mirror type deal, focus HAARP on a very small spot, or set off a nuke in the sky to run a laser or something pointed down at the buildings.  I don't see any of that happening. Then there's the radionuclide thing to account for.  Mr Tahil and Dimitri Khalezov are on

the same page I think. I believe Columbia and UC Davis both reported radionuclides also.  I do think I'll order Dr

Wood's book,  because it looks very informative as to all the strange happenings that day. While I'm at it, I would like to say something about the rusted metal. If you use muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid) to clean steel

before painting, the steel will start rusting as soon as you wash it off and it dries.  You have to paint it pretty quick to stop the oxidation. The cars with the melted engines must have been exposed to chunks of thermate.

Either someone deposited it there in the middle of the commotion, or it fell off the towers.  The cars are a real

mystery to me. Missing door handles (maybe plastic?) ...  upside down car on fence either blast wave or forklift

 .....  thanks for your help  .....  Danny

Comment by Shallel Octavia on January 7, 2012 at 12:19pm

"the power sources from the DEW would not have been practical to turn the twin towers to dust in 10 seconds"

And you know this how? I don't think this was powered by ConEd. Judy herself states that it could be a catalyzed nuclear reaction. Listen to Jim's interview with Chris Busby. (Uranium catalyzed fusion used in Fallujah.) I believe there is infinite energy in the vacuum, and this suppressed tech is the ability to tap into that energy. So the power source is a non issue. Thermite is a limited hangout. See http://911scholars.ning.com/video/where-did-the-towers-go-dr-judy-w... for very cogent answers to these issues.

© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service