Comments - An interview with FEMA videographer Kurt Sonnenfeld on The Voltaire Network - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-28T11:31:07Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A1403&xn_auth=noWill do, Jim. I'm researching…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-29:3488444:Comment:17012009-06-29T16:59:47.000ZCurtis Sherwoodhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/CurtisSherwood
Will do, Jim. I'm researching a bit now and am intercating with Pilots for Truth to get more on their opinions on R/C birds + UA175's uncanny approach. Basic knowledge from the line of work I'm in will help with the Computer Room + Battery Room info. Data Centers plus Auxiliary Battery Rooms are things we can find in any larger building in any large city across the globe these days. This drifts far away from the subject at hand, namely Sonnefeld's work and how that vault was found to be empty…
Will do, Jim. I'm researching a bit now and am intercating with Pilots for Truth to get more on their opinions on R/C birds + UA175's uncanny approach. Basic knowledge from the line of work I'm in will help with the Computer Room + Battery Room info. Data Centers plus Auxiliary Battery Rooms are things we can find in any larger building in any large city across the globe these days. This drifts far away from the subject at hand, namely Sonnefeld's work and how that vault was found to be empty so I'll leave it at that, for now. This is very, very good, Curt…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16272009-06-28T20:11:04.000ZJames H. Fetzerhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
This is very, very good, Curtis. I think you are making important points. Could you consider turing this into an article? Send me a draft and I can smooth it, if you like. My email address is jfetzer@d.umn.edu.
This is very, very good, Curtis. I think you are making important points. Could you consider turing this into an article? Send me a draft and I can smooth it, if you like. My email address is jfetzer@d.umn.edu. Oops, I had already noticed w…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16262009-06-28T19:54:04.000ZCurtis Sherwoodhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/CurtisSherwood
Oops, I had already noticed we both posted the same story as blogs the same day. A collision of information. No harm done at all, Jim. Watch how Sonnefeld (the Messanger) is attacked on various websites, blogs, foren etc. while the message, a real eye opener is left untouched. I think this is amazing. There are not only a number of persons actively working on burrying this story but also a large percentage of persons completely ignoring the weight of the story. We can go into as much detail as…
Oops, I had already noticed we both posted the same story as blogs the same day. A collision of information. No harm done at all, Jim. Watch how Sonnefeld (the Messanger) is attacked on various websites, blogs, foren etc. while the message, a real eye opener is left untouched. I think this is amazing. There are not only a number of persons actively working on burrying this story but also a large percentage of persons completely ignoring the weight of the story. We can go into as much detail as we wish on HOW it was done, but the idea that someone can actually prove the Agency was well prepared and took necessary damage control actions (clean the vault e.g.) PRIOR to the attacks is more than enough to warrant a new invetigation. Not that I personally believe a second whitewash would do us any good but if it can be proved that the vault was cleaned in advance, say, on the 9th and the 10th, the attacks on the 11th can no longer be held to have been surprise attacks. To further this, a number of other very strange items from that day make the official CT look very very strange. 1) the approach pattern of UA175, an almost impossible manouver for an inexperienced pilot and an illogical approach for a seasoned pilot if he wanted to hit his target....2) so why hit two targets when two planes into one target would provide a larger chance of the one target being destroyed and 3) why did both "planes" crash into the data centers (computer rooms) in both buildings? The basics are sufficient to expose the lie. If we can focus on the messag…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16252009-06-28T19:35:25.000ZCurtis Sherwoodhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/CurtisSherwood
If we can focus on the message, not the messanger.<br />
<br />
Sonnefeld;<br />
<br />
"When the North Tower fell, the US Customs House (Building 6) was crushed and totally incinerated. Much of the underground levels beneath it were also destroyed. But there were voids. And it was into one of those voids, recently uncovered, that I descended with a special Task Force to investigate. It was there we found the security antechamber to the vault, badly damaged. At the far end of the security office was the wide steel…
If we can focus on the message, not the messanger.<br />
<br />
Sonnefeld;<br />
<br />
"When the North Tower fell, the US Customs House (Building 6) was crushed and totally incinerated. Much of the underground levels beneath it were also destroyed. But there were voids. And it was into one of those voids, recently uncovered, that I descended with a special Task Force to investigate. It was there we found the security antechamber to the vault, badly damaged. At the far end of the security office was the wide steel door to the vault, a combination code keypad in the cinderblock wall beside it. But the wall was cracked and partially crumbled, and the door was sprung partially open. So we checked inside with our flashlights. Except for several rows of empty shelves, there was nothing in the vault but dust and debris. It had been emptied. Why was it empty? And when could it have been emptied?"<br />
<br />
Logic tels us, the attack came as no suprise. This alone is evidence enough to crack the official CT. If Sonnefled can prove this, why, of course he would become a target.<br />
<br />
Jim, the moderating process is a-okay. I had the feeling my blog entry had been completely overlooked. Irrelevant. The message is there. That's the important part. Curtis: You mean this one? We…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16242009-06-28T19:21:32.000ZJames H. Fetzerhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
Curtis: You mean this one? Were you recommending a change in the moderating process? I didn't think I was doing any (except for approving videos).<br />
<br />
Kurt Sonnenfeld: Yes, but not immediately. With so much chaos, it was difficult to think. It was only after digesting everything that the “alarm bells” went off.<br />
<br />
Building Six was evacuated within twelve minutes after the first airplane struck the North Tower. The streets were immediately clogged with fire trucks, police cars and blocked traffic,…
Curtis: You mean this one? Were you recommending a change in the moderating process? I didn't think I was doing any (except for approving videos).<br />
<br />
Kurt Sonnenfeld: Yes, but not immediately. With so much chaos, it was difficult to think. It was only after digesting everything that the “alarm bells” went off.<br />
<br />
Building Six was evacuated within twelve minutes after the first airplane struck the North Tower. The streets were immediately clogged with fire trucks, police cars and blocked traffic, and the vault was large enough, 15 meters by 15 meters by my estimate, to necessitate at least a big truck to carry out its contents. And after the towers fell and destroyed most of the parking level, a mission to recover the contents of the vault would have been impossible. The vault had to have been emptied before the attack.<br />
<br />
I’ve described all of this extensively in my book, and it’s apparent that things of importance were taken out of harm’s way before the attacks. For example, the CIA didn’t seem too concerned about their losses. After the existence of their clandestine office in Building Seven was discovered, an agency spokesman told the newspapers that a special team had been dispatched to scour the rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports, though there were millions, if not billions of pages floating in the streets. Nevertheless, the spokesman was confident. “There shouldn’t be too much paper around,” he said.<br />
<br />
read the complete interview/article here You didn't see the paper shre…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16232009-06-28T19:12:59.000ZCurtis Sherwoodhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/CurtisSherwood
You didn't see the paper shredder blog I added last week? Hmmmm. Something is wrong here.
You didn't see the paper shredder blog I added last week? Hmmmm. Something is wrong here.