Comments - A letter I support but which is being sent out over and over again without correction . . . - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T14:00:15Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A14075&xn_auth=noRalph emailed me to explain t…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-03-05:3488444:Comment:138832011-03-05T03:54:45.391ZJames H. Fetzerhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
Ralph emailed me to explain that he was switching computers and the emails were accidental. So I am reinstating him.
Ralph emailed me to explain that he was switching computers and the emails were accidental. So I am reinstating him. "Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd"…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-03-05:3488444:Comment:138822011-03-05T03:25:27.932ZJames H. Fetzerhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
"Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd" <ralph@jusbelli.com> sent me the same letter FIVE TIMES. I replied at least three times and explained that I am a huge fan of Judy Wood. But this repetitive behavior strikes me as more than a little nutty. So I have suspended him. I did not mean for any posts to be deleted, but I think they were.
"Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd" <ralph@jusbelli.com> sent me the same letter FIVE TIMES. I replied at least three times and explained that I am a huge fan of Judy Wood. But this repetitive behavior strikes me as more than a little nutty. So I have suspended him. I did not mean for any posts to be deleted, but I think they were. You have both made excellent…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-03-05:3488444:Comment:139812011-03-05T01:26:27.418ZJames H. Fetzerhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
You have both made excellent posts here. I still support her, but that does not mean I agree with her. She does a much better job of explaining what we have to explain than she does of actually explaining it. Fascinating!<br/>
You have both made excellent posts here. I still support her, but that does not mean I agree with her. She does a much better job of explaining what we have to explain than she does of actually explaining it. Fascinating!<br/> "Her focus is solely on the e…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-03-05:3488444:Comment:140772011-03-05T01:13:13.652ZThoth IIhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>"Her focus is solely on the empirical, measurable, and observable study of <br></br>evidence of any relevant kind—from analysis, measurement, and study of the “remains” of <br></br>the WTC buildings through analysis of the seismic record of that day’s events, study of <br></br>anomalies in the earth’s magnetic field at the times of the destructions, and even study <br></br>of the field effects of the massive hurricane off the east coast of the U.S. on that day "</p>
<p> </p>
<p><br></br>(and especially of that…</p>
<p>"Her focus is solely on the empirical, measurable, and observable study of <br/>evidence of any relevant kind—from analysis, measurement, and study of the “remains” of <br/>the WTC buildings through analysis of the seismic record of that day’s events, study of <br/>anomalies in the earth’s magnetic field at the times of the destructions, and even study <br/>of the field effects of the massive hurricane off the east coast of the U.S. on that day "</p>
<p> </p>
<p><br/>(and especially of that storm’s field effects in relation to the enormous high pressure <br/>cell that was simultaneously approaching NYC from the west)."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is all well and good, and Dr. Wood's hypotheses should be considered along with the serious list of completing "H's" which also includes mini-nukes. However, I just think she is simply wrong in thinking DEWs were used on 911 (or her other perhaps not as well thought out H's of Hutch effect (which I think is bunk), and the hurricane (another way off H).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am not adopting a "religion" or "cult" of worshipping anyone's H. I simply will apply the scientific method as I see it and I myself think all the evidence is consistent more with the mini nuke H. I will be surprised if in the end the mini-nuke one doesn't become the accepted one.</p> I agree that this book is abs…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-03-04:3488444:Comment:138762011-03-04T23:29:08.062ZShallel Octaviahttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Shallel
<p>I agree that this book is absolutely brilliant work! However I question if it could be considered "Patriotic" when is a damning case against the United States and its disgusting policies based on lies, and the transparent coverup of the greatest crime in human history. I wonder if Judy would consider herself a patriot? I think nationalism and patriotism are outmoded concepts. We need to transcend these chest beating monkey ideas if we want to advance morally and spiritually. Thanks for…</p>
<p>I agree that this book is absolutely brilliant work! However I question if it could be considered "Patriotic" when is a damning case against the United States and its disgusting policies based on lies, and the transparent coverup of the greatest crime in human history. I wonder if Judy would consider herself a patriot? I think nationalism and patriotism are outmoded concepts. We need to transcend these chest beating monkey ideas if we want to advance morally and spiritually. Thanks for posting this Jim, and clarifying once more your support for Judy's science. You introduced Judy to me on your radio show, and have been very consistent about supporting her and crediting her in spite of heavy criticism from her camp.</p>