Comments - Re: Jim Fetzer and the (Ill) Logical Distinction - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-28T11:31:12Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A1562&xn_auth=noquoting Jim: "If that means w…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2009-06-28:3488444:Comment:16042009-06-28T16:08:33.000ZThoth IIhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
quoting Jim: "If that means we are confronted with two alternatives--compositing and holograms--then that is<br />
an enormous step in the right direction"<br />
<br />
In my opinion, looking at the data I've seen, I think those are exactly the 2 possibilities where research should be directed by experts. Those are the remaining 2 possibilities given all the evidence<br />
<br />
Not be an expert in videos, all I can do is give my hunch. To me, a clue as to how an expert can tell things in a video is given by John…
quoting Jim: "If that means we are confronted with two alternatives--compositing and holograms--then that is<br />
an enormous step in the right direction"<br />
<br />
In my opinion, looking at the data I've seen, I think those are exactly the 2 possibilities where research should be directed by experts. Those are the remaining 2 possibilities given all the evidence<br />
<br />
Not be an expert in videos, all I can do is give my hunch. To me, a clue as to how an expert can tell things in a video is given by John Costella's work on the Z-film . There, he was able to see features internal to the film which tipped him off as to the details as to what was exactly done in recreating the film. Maybe there are such clues internal to the available twin tower films that could tell an expert exactly what was done also.