Comments - Nuclear Atmospheric Physicist Dr. Thomas Cahill On 911 - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T05:57:55Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A46962&xn_auth=noThomas Cahill dust analysis:…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:471772012-02-21T09:01:19.142ZJeffhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Jeff
<p>Thomas Cahill dust analysis: <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02786820490250836" target="_blank">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02786820490250836</a></p>
<p>Thomas Cahill dust analysis: <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02786820490250836" target="_blank">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02786820490250836</a></p> UC Davis Delta Group Ground Z…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:471372012-02-21T08:37:45.479ZJeffhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Jeff
<p>UC Davis Delta Group Ground Zero data: <a href="http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC.htm" target="_blank">http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC.htm</a></p>
<p>UC Davis Delta Group Ground Zero data: <a href="http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC.htm" target="_blank">http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC.htm</a></p> Open source link to USGS data…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:471362012-02-21T08:26:19.810ZJeffhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Jeff
<p>Open source link to USGS data: <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/" target="_blank">http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/</a></p>
<p>Open source link to USGS data: <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/" target="_blank">http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/</a></p> Pages 19-42 provide the nucle…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:471762012-02-21T08:21:52.911ZJeffhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Jeff
<p>Pages 19-42 provide the nuclear evidence Chuck.<br></br><br></br><span class="commentBody">Harrit posits a minimum of 29,000 tons of energetic compounds in the dust. The DOT has established tractor trailer vehicle limits: 8.5 feet (2.6 m) wide, 13.5 feet (4.1 m) in height, and 80,000 pounds (36,000 kg) gross weight. The weight limit is further restricted with a limit of 34,000 pounds (15,000 kg) per tandem axle and 20,000 pounds (9,100 kg) per single axle.<br></br> <br></br> It would require 725 tractor…</span></p>
<p>Pages 19-42 provide the nuclear evidence Chuck.<br/><br/><span class="commentBody">Harrit posits a minimum of 29,000 tons of energetic compounds in the dust. The DOT has established tractor trailer vehicle limits: 8.5 feet (2.6 m) wide, 13.5 feet (4.1 m) in height, and 80,000 pounds (36,000 kg) gross weight. The weight limit is further restricted with a limit of 34,000 pounds (15,000 kg) per tandem axle and 20,000 pounds (9,100 kg) per single axle.<br/> <br/> It would require 725 tractor trailer loads. 29,000 one ton boxes would have had to have been off-loaded, taken to a service elevator and brought into the building. This is, of course, preposterous.</span><br/><br/><span class="commentBody">Moving 100 one ton boxes a day, that's 12 an hour, would require 290 days. Working 24 hours a day, around the clock, it still would have required almost 100 days working 24/7.</span> Needless to say, this just didn't happen.</p> Jeff,
Thanks for the resource…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:469732012-02-21T07:29:34.987ZChuck Boldwynhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ChuckBoldwyn
Jeff,<br />
Thanks for the resource downloads to my iPad. I will review the 3 parts to see if I can find what I am looking for & for future reference.<br />
I hope they reported everything & did not hold back on the info I most need.<br />
You suspect the report is holding back the direct reporting of nuclear evidence.<br />
The only other alternative is to analyze a dust sample myself for evidence of Al2O3.<br />
Nuclear evidence would be great to find outnabout, also...
Jeff,<br />
Thanks for the resource downloads to my iPad. I will review the 3 parts to see if I can find what I am looking for & for future reference.<br />
I hope they reported everything & did not hold back on the info I most need.<br />
You suspect the report is holding back the direct reporting of nuclear evidence.<br />
The only other alternative is to analyze a dust sample myself for evidence of Al2O3.<br />
Nuclear evidence would be great to find outnabout, also... Thank you for responding Chuc…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:469712012-02-21T07:09:58.568ZJeffhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Jeff
<p>Thank you for responding Chuck. My book 'Dust' contains some of the data you're looking for and within the book are currently active links to the comprehensive USGS data. My books on 911, all of them, are free downloads. Dust contains unarguable data from pages 19-42. Beyond page 42 is speculation based on good data. There was silicon in the dust. I don't remember if it was classified as a Trace or Major element or what the PPMs ot % were across the 35 sample locations. Because the book has…</p>
<p>Thank you for responding Chuck. My book 'Dust' contains some of the data you're looking for and within the book are currently active links to the comprehensive USGS data. My books on 911, all of them, are free downloads. Dust contains unarguable data from pages 19-42. Beyond page 42 is speculation based on good data. There was silicon in the dust. I don't remember if it was classified as a Trace or Major element or what the PPMs ot % were across the 35 sample locations. Because the book has numerous high quality images and is uncompressed it required formatting in 3 parts.<br/><br/>Dust:<br/>An examination of 12 sample locations of dust from the WTC. The samples, provided by the USGS are analyzed using chemistry, mathematics and physics.<br/><br/>Part 1: <br/><a href="http://www.box.net/shared/9duecajohk" target="_blank">http://www.box.net/shared/9duecajohk</a><br/><br/>Part 2:<br/><a href="http://www.box.net/shared/h81kjfkvg9" target="_blank">http://www.box.net/shared/h81kjfkvg9</a><br/><br/>Part 3:<br/><a href="http://www.box.net/shared/td6593g25y" target="_blank">http://www.box.net/shared/td6593g25y</a><br/><br/><br/><br/></p> Where can I find the Official…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-02-21:3488444:Comment:470702012-02-21T05:13:41.265ZChuck Boldwynhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ChuckBoldwyn
Where can I find the Official Analytical Reports on all the materials studied & analyzed, especially the white fumes above Ground Zero.<br />
I am looking for traces of Al2O3, a major reaction product of the Thermate Incendiary Chemical Reaction.<br />
The Silicon residue found may have come from the Silicon base or substrate that the Thermate chemicals were uniformly placed upon. Silicon should have been found, supporting the use of the Thermate found and analyzed by Prof. Neils Haritt &…
Where can I find the Official Analytical Reports on all the materials studied & analyzed, especially the white fumes above Ground Zero.<br />
I am looking for traces of Al2O3, a major reaction product of the Thermate Incendiary Chemical Reaction.<br />
The Silicon residue found may have come from the Silicon base or substrate that the Thermate chemicals were uniformly placed upon. Silicon should have been found, supporting the use of the Thermate found and analyzed by Prof. Neils Haritt & co-authors, to assist in bringing down the Towers, Thermodynamically.<br />
Was Aluminum Oxide found anywhere, that if found would give conclusive proof for Thermate use on the WTC Complex?