Comments - Physics forum: "Dustification" of Steel vs. Vaporization of Steel - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T11:21:31Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A48287&xn_auth=noMy photo album: http://911sch…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-08-02:3488444:Comment:505742012-08-02T18:11:30.228ZShallel Octaviahttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Shallel
<p>My photo album: <a href="http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/albums/free-falling-steel-sections-dissolving-to-dust" target="_blank">http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/albums/free-falling-steel-sections-dissolving-to-dust</a> clearly shows steel sections in free-fall dissolving to dust, not fragmenting, not vaporizing, but dissolving. I fail to see how this would be caused by Thermite or Nukes. </p>
<p>My photo album: <a href="http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/albums/free-falling-steel-sections-dissolving-to-dust" target="_blank">http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/albums/free-falling-steel-sections-dissolving-to-dust</a> clearly shows steel sections in free-fall dissolving to dust, not fragmenting, not vaporizing, but dissolving. I fail to see how this would be caused by Thermite or Nukes. </p> "We determine what happened b…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-05-05:3488444:Comment:481342012-05-05T20:30:00.580ZThoth IIhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>"<span>We determine what happened based on the final dust particle sizes collected—which was heavily doctored and lied about by the regime’s scientists and engineers as I have lengthily detailed, dust and ash placement on the ground as well as video of it going far and wide, eyewitness evidence and photos including those of flowing molten metal weeks and months later, seismic evidence (also heavily doctored and “re-analyzed”—sound familiar?), thermal signatures, and other evidence including…</span></p>
<p>"<span>We determine what happened based on the final dust particle sizes collected—which was heavily doctored and lied about by the regime’s scientists and engineers as I have lengthily detailed, dust and ash placement on the ground as well as video of it going far and wide, eyewitness evidence and photos including those of flowing molten metal weeks and months later, seismic evidence (also heavily doctored and “re-analyzed”—sound familiar?), thermal signatures, and other evidence including radionuclide study as was done by Tahil.</span><br/><br/><span>All such evidence and analysis virtually prove that small nuclear bombs were exploded and that the China Syndrome occurred under and around the former WTC. Resurrecting or focusing on “dustification:” alone may not be productive when the entire set of evidence of the nuking and China Syndrome should be repeatedly emphasized. Perhaps my brief summary on this is the best piece to promulgate again and again."</span></p>
<p><span><br/></span></p>
<p><span>I am beginning to believe all of this, and that when 911 was planned, one of the main elements was the detail of the misinformation. The fact that nukes were used had to be hidden at all costs because of the inflamatory nature of this. However, they absolutely had to use nukes for the energy requirements of pulverizing the WTC so completely. So any technique that led away from the nukes was employed, hiding the details of the dust, dead end hypotheses like thermite and maybe DEW. I still think Chuck is correct that thermite was used to soften up the core steel and that was a detail worked out by the demolitions experts, but nukes did the heavy lifting that day. </span></p>