Comments - Comment about Judy Wood from The Vancouver Hearings - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T10:17:26Zhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A49584&xn_auth=noRegarding Professor Michel Ch…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-07-23:3488444:Comment:495892012-07-23T14:36:26.063ZJeannon Kraljhttp://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JeannonKralj
<p>Regarding Professor Michel Chossudovsky and GlobalResearch.ca, I have known about them for a very long time. They are not about 9-11 truth. I even exchanged emails with Profeassor C. regarding his posting an article about Dr. Steven Jones article on thermite and pointed him to Dr. Fetzer's critique of that study. Dr. C. wrote me back and suggested I carefully read Dr. Jones' study and come to my own conclusions. I have read several articles by Prof. C. and Wm. Engdahl on that website…</p>
<p>Regarding Professor Michel Chossudovsky and GlobalResearch.ca, I have known about them for a very long time. They are not about 9-11 truth. I even exchanged emails with Profeassor C. regarding his posting an article about Dr. Steven Jones article on thermite and pointed him to Dr. Fetzer's critique of that study. Dr. C. wrote me back and suggested I carefully read Dr. Jones' study and come to my own conclusions. I have read several articles by Prof. C. and Wm. Engdahl on that website that presuppose the the nanothermite gang's "truths."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Professor C and globalresearch gave us the the first clear and major truth that al qaeda is a CIA creation.</p>
<p>I will have to look up some recent writings by Tarpley, but I think it is incorrect to say he pushes Al Qaida. I listen to his radio show every Saturday afternoon and read his articles linked from Rense.com and best I can recall he always lambasts NATO and clearly points out that NATO really is the USA. Agree that Tarpley never ever mentions Israel and there can be no correct coverage of current Middle East status or 9-11, unless Israel's part is fully discussed and documented as much as possible. I think Tarpley recently visited Syria and he is very much against the USA's role there. He also visited Libya when that crisis was at its peak.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sorry, but until my last comment at VeteransToday.com by Craig McKee is accepted and posted, I will not put much stock in Mckee, or Duff or whoever it is who spiked my comment. It appeared my comment was at first posted and then removed. It has been about 14 hours since I submitted post, so we shall see. I will post my comment below.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(The more I study the nanothermite gang and all their spawn groups and people, the more I see connections to the Zionists / Mossad / Israel connections to 9-11. I do not think Keven Barrett or many others yet see these connections.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/a-757-actually-did-hit-the-pentagon-trust-us/comment-page-1/#comment-445544">http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/a-757-actually-did-hit-the-pentagon-trust-us/comment-page-1/#comment-445544</a></p>
<p> </p>
<h1 class="singlePageTitle">A 757 Actually DID Hit the Pentagon! Trust Us, We’re Truthers!</h1>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" title="A 757 Actually DID Hit the Pentagon! Trust Us, We’re Truthers!"><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like at300b" title="Send to Facebook_like" href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/a-757-actually-did-hit-the-pentagon-trust-us/comment-page-1/#"><span style="width: 90px; height: 21px;"></span></a></div>
<h1><a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/a-757-actually-did-hit-the-pentagon-trust-us/pentagon_hole2-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-215803"><img style="margin: 10px; border: black 1px solid;" class=" wp-image-215803 alignright" alt="" src="http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/pentagon_hole21-267x320.jpg" width="267" height="320"/></a>More absurd arguments on the Pentagon: ‘propaganda team’ sets its sights on Griffin</h1>
<p> </p>
<h2>By <a href="http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/07/16/more-absurd-arguments-on-the-pentagon-propaganda-team-sets-its-sights-on-griffin/" target="_blank">Craig McKee</a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p>_____________________________________</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="yiv1563876906comment-author yiv1563876906vcard"><cite class="yiv1563876906fn"><a class="yiv1563876906url" href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000240850706" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">jeannonkralj</a></cite><div class="yiv1563876906comment-meta yiv1563876906commentmetadata"><a href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/17/a-757-actually-did-hit-the-pentagon-trust-us/comment-page-1/#comment-445544" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">July 22, 2012 - 3:40 pm</a></div>
<div class="yiv1563876906avatar"></div>
</div>
<div>“Kevin Ryan, David Chandler, Frank Legge, Jonathan Cole, Jim Hoffman, John Bursill, and others” are joined at the hip to that group I refer to as the “nanothermite gang.(NTG)” Dr. Steven Jones is the originator and creator of the NTG and Richard Gage and Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth are Dr. Jones’ first born child. I sometimes wonder if Dr. David Ray Griffin is not also part of the NTG since he claims that nanothermite is a “high explosive.” (““High explosives, such as RDX or nanothermite, could explain these horizontal ejections.”) Nanothermite is NOT a high explosive according to Mark Hightower’s proof.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have never accepted the whole idea of the consensus panel (consensus911.org) and their “seeking consensus within the Truth movement on where the official story can be shown to be wrong.” First of all the people on that panel have a very narrow view of what constitutes something they call “the Truth movement.” Secondly “where the official story can be shown to be wrong” is also interpreted very narrowly by this group. What constitutes “wrong” is also, or should be a subject of much discussion. I do not believe that consensus can be reached on any of those issues so the output of this panel is going to be GIGO.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Dr. Fetzer had a guest on his radio show who worked for some time as a volunteer for Gage’s Architects and Engineers. This guest said he was commanded never ever to go near the topic of the Pentagon. That has been the clear track record of the NTG from 2005 when they started the “hard science” part of the 9-11 truth “movement.”</div>
<div>Now, of course, the NTG has moved on to the “controlled explosive demolition” of WTC 7, WTC7 being another topic the NTG would not touch at least for its first five years, and calling for a new investigation, and nanothermite has been left in the dust.</div>
<p><br/><br/></p>