9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

The REAL Fox News, The Real Tucker Carlson on 9-11

Went through quite a bit to get this 2008 video of Tucker Carlson, Fox TV "upsttanding patriot host" calling people who question the official story of 9-11 morons.

Vivian Lee was kind of enough to save this video on Real.video   as the Google Filth thought they had totally taken down and thrown in the memory hole forever this 7:30 video from the many sites it had been posted on.

Someone at Freedomoutpost was, upon my email request, was able to restore the video and re-embed it in their article.

Fox TV news will not speak truth about 9-11 or any other false event of the last 25 years, nor will Fox News ever say a word about pedophilia, satanic ritual abuse and child sacrifice, and child / human trafficking by elites of USA and the world over.  It is what Fox News deliberately won't talk about that shows you Fox News is not our only source left for honest news reporting.

https://www.real.video/5847467800001

Fox News' Tucker Carlson: If You Don't Believe the Official Story About 9/11, You're A Moron

29 views

Also see the article about this video.

https://freedomoutpost.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson-dont-believe-off...

 

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson: If You Don’t Believe the Official Story About 9/11, You’re A Moron

Tim Brown — September 21, 2017

NationalHeadlinesToday.com

Published: 2 days ago

Fox News' Tucker Carlson was captured on video in West Des Moines, Iowa as Michelle Bachmann was speaking in local businesses. in somewhat of an improv interview on the street by The Liberty Hound. In that interview, Carlson openly stated that is you don't buy into the official story, which he does, then you're a moron.

___________________________

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson: If You Don’t Believe the Official Story About 9/11, You’re A Moron

Tim Brown — September 21, 2017

Fox News' Tucker Carlson was captured on video in West Des Moines, Iowa as Michelle Bachmann was speaking in local businesses. in somewhat of an improv interview on the street by The Liberty Hound.  In that interview, Carlson openly stated that is you don't buy into the official story, which he does, then you're a moron.

The conversation began with Carlson being asked about leaving a 2008 event in Minneapolis, Minnesota for Ron Paul.

While Carlson said it was "fun," he added that "The truther stuff infuriates me."

"I was enraged," further added.

https://youtu.be/oqR1glfOTIA

Carlson said that if there was any evidence that might conclude 9/11 was an inside job, he had not seen it.

“I hate that 9/11 crap,” he said. “I think that people, before saying something that heavy, ought to present real evidence."

When asked about World Trade Center 7's collapse, Carlson would not answer the question posed, but mocked it.

"My macro view is the obvious one, that the buildings came down because a bunch of nutcases flew a plane into them,” he said, even though Building 7 was not hit by any plane.

Hello, Tucker? Just two years later, Carlson would appear on Infowars, be shown evidence concerning Building 7 and go, "I have no idea."  Then he goes on to agree with Jones that 9/11 was used to take American's liberties.

He also claims that alleged statements by former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura about 9/11 being an inside job and asking questions about the official story were "not controversial," but "stupid."

He would go on to state that such conversations should not even be taking place among mature adults.

However, he would also say, "I'm open to about almost any crackpot theory about anything. It's just on that subject... c'mon.  You know what I mean?  That's too much.  I mean even for me!"

A bystander commented that there is a history of state-sponsored terror and Carlson had no response to that comment.

Operation Northwoods comes to mind. I mean, if the government will allow a plan like that to even be hatched and submitted decades ago, what do you think they might be doing today with the level of corruption we've seen?

The bystander also stated something the temperature that steel begins to melt at was not reached, which has been one of the many pieces of evidence that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Trut....  In fact, here's an entire list they created with documentation.

On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.

In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.

KEY EVIDENCE

  1. Rapid onsetof destruction,
  2. Constant accelerationat or near free-fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance,
  3. Numerous eyewitness accountsof explosions including 118 FDNY personnel,
  4. Lateral ejectionof multi-ton steel framing members distances of 600 feet at more than 60 mph,
  5. Mid-air pulverizationof 90,000 tons of concrete, and large volumes of expanding pyroclastic-like dust clouds,
  6. Isolated explosive ejections20 to 60 stories below the “crush zone,”
  7. Total destructionand dismemberment of all three buildings, with 220 floors each an acre in size missing from the Twin Towers’ debris pile,
  8. Several tons of molten steel/ironfound in the debris piles,
  9. Evidence of thermite incendiarieson steel beams,
  10. Nanothermite compositesand iron microspheres found in WTC dust samples.

Articles by AE911Truth

The following articles discuss and analyze the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. While most of these articles are intended for a general audience, the articles under “Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports” are geared toward readers with greater technical knowledge.

World Trade Center Building 7

Twin Towers

Views: 147

▶ Reply to This

About

James H. Fetzer created this Ning Network.
Create a Ning Network! »

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service