"9/11: Explosive Evidence" new AE911Truth.org video

[Jeannon Kralj]

 

 

 Just wanted to comment on Architects and Engineers for 9-11 "Truth" 's new video titled
"9/11: Explosive Evidence."

http://www.ae911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer....

The
Trailer is Here!

Preview the New AE911Truth Documentary:

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Please
forward this Action Alert everywhere

They will release the full
video, apparently on Sunday, 9-11, 2011. The entire video will be viewed at our
local "thermite gang" Brave New Books store at 6:pm on 9-11-11.

First of all, the title is
deceptive and manipulative.

 

As Mark Hightower has
already shown, this special form of thermite, nano-thermite, discovered by Dr.
Steven Jones and the thermite gang, is NOT a "high explosive." There
are different forms of "nano-thermite" but the residues said to be
found by the thermite gang's studies is not the form or forms that can even be made
in to, fashioned in to, even a low-explosive. Some forms of nano-thermite can
be made in to a low velocity explosive by adding certain elements, but a
"low explosive" can in no way, shape or form account for the evidence
as viewed on videos of large steel beams being spewed from the tower(s). A very
high velocity, high "explosive" event is what the
"evidence", the video evidence, portrays.

So to name the video ""9/11:
Explosive Evidence." is just one of many many attempts, in speech and in
written word and various media venues, to convey the idea that those "red
/ gray chips" found in the dust, and those metal "spherules" found
in the dust are the direct result of "explosive nano-thermite.” David Ray
Griffin and I believe Richard Gage say, upon questioning, about their constant
use of term "explosive" that it is OK for them to use the term
"explosive" and they cannot help it if people interpret their use of
the term "explosive" as the kind of "explosive" that
accounted for the apparent "high explosive" 9-11 tower events. [my
paraphrase] So dishonest, so deceptive, so evil!

 

The trailer video shows Dr.
Steven Jones making the complaint that NIST did not even test for
"explosives" in Building 7. Well, thanks to Mark Highower, Dr. James
Fetzer, and Steve Farney, we can ask the same of Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Niels
Harrit "Why did you, the thermite gang, not bother to do the obvious,
scientific, warranted step in your study of testing for explosives, testing for
residues of explosives and identifying the explosives employed?"

 

I noticed throughout the
trailer that the beginning of the video shows a tower "dustifying"
from the top down, while the entire theme of the video as well as
AE911truth.org's for their Tenth Anniversary "Building What?"
campaign has been World Trade Center Building 7. The video trailer very clearly
wants to blur the causation of the demolition of Building 7 with the causation
of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Dr. Sabrosky at VeteransToday.com site
as well as Dr. Bob Bowman in video and in text have also indicated that
whatever accounted for the "controlled demolition" of Building 7 also
accounts for the demolition of the Twin Towers. (I notice that even Brother
Nathanial Kapner on his latest video at RealZionistNews [ with script text
posted as well ] states this same blurring and leap to include the Twin Towers
in the thermite gang's Building 7 / Tenth Anniversary campaign.

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=647

Did Israel’s Mossad Do 9/11?

quote from video script
text follows...

 

"The most striking points of
Dr Sabrosky’s exposé and my own research are:

1. The controlled
demolition of Tower 7 upon which no plane hit when Larry Silverstein, Jewish
owner of the World Trade Center, ordered the Tower taken down hours later with the
words, “Pull It,” proves that if one building was wired for controlled
demolition, then all three were as well.

2. The company providing
security to the World Trade Center, Kroll Associates, was apparently operated
by Zionists.

3. The owners and operators
of Kroll Associates and their immediate relatives were absent save one Gentile
new employee the morning of 9/11.

And only 3 out of 4,000
Israelis working at the Towers were at their jobs and died in the explosions.
"

 

My observation is that Dr. Steven Jones and his group, 9-11 Scholars for Truth & Justice,

starting in 2005, and its spawn, Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, starting perhaps
in late 2006, up until say about early 2010, rarely ever even mentioned
Building 7 in all their propaganda. The "Building What?" campaign
apparently was a new strategy, a new corralling or channeling strategy, adopted
a little under two years ago. Those of us who have been seeking 9-11 truth
since 9-11-01 and who have not been proselytized into the thermite gang's web
of deceit, can easily observe these historical changes in the thermite gang’s
public relations strategies.

The NYCan.org 9-11
"education" campaign is another spawn of the thermite gang. This
group has as its goal raising awareness of Building 7 among New Yorkers,
especially Manhattan borough New Yorkers, toward the goal of having the county
and the New York attorney general launch "a new investigation." They
are seeking one million dollars in donations to pay for their advertisements
about Building 7 on local and national television and on subways and subway
stations and other areas in the locale of New York City. No mention is made of
the goal of having a law suit filed and by whom and the reality of that
prospect.

As I have stated before,
there is nothing new in knowing that we need a new, honest independent investigation
of 9-11. We have needed that since the 9-11 Commission report came out in 2004.

And the obvious
conventional or classic controlled demolition appearance of Building 7 has been
known to all of us so there is absolutely nothing new to 9-11 truth seekers in
this latest thermite gang's strategy.

Logical thinking people
know very well there will never be a full honest independent investigation of
9-11. That impossibility is a done deal at this point in time. So why would the
thermite gang be getting people's hopes up about that at this time?

My whole area, Austin, TX,
is totally corralled, confined, and brain washed in to the whole thermite gang’s
meme or rhetoric.

I have thought about what
possibly could be the thermite gang’s motivations in this Tenth Anniversary
strategy of focusing on Building 7, "explosive nano-thermite", "explosive
controlled demolition" and call for a new investigation. I would
appreciate others' ideas about this, but I guess the thermite gang wants to solidify
forever their place as the "premiere" seekers of truth regarding
9-11. With their latest corralling of Dr. Sabrosky and Brother Nathaniel into
their web, they have also managed to corral those who say 9-11 was primarily
perpetrated by "the Mossad" and "Zionists". Quite a coup
indeed!

It is extremely sad to see
that Dr. Steven Jones and Architects and Engineers for 9-11 "Truth"
and so many of the local "awakened patriots" are remembering this
tenth anniversary of 9-11 in such consummately untruthful ways.

 

[Thoth II]

"It is extremely sad to see that Dr. Steven Jones and Architects and Engineers for 9-11 "Truth" and so many of the local "awakened patriots" are remembering this tenth anniversary of 9-11 in such consumately untruthful ways."

 

I know, people get locked into their pet theories.  In JFK this happened with the Z film, guys like Robert Groden and Josiah Thompson based their work on the Z film , and it is a totally false depiction of events.  Now that the charade has been exposed, they still can't fess up.  That's why research gets stalled, these influential researchers get ego, not science, involved, and block all the rest of us from progress.  Deja vu.