Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
"A message to all members of 9/11 Scholars Forum" Jeannon's response
Part I - Jeannon Kralj Survey Response
(1) (a)
Yes, 9-11 was a "terrorist" act.
"the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents"
U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d) )
(1)(i)
No. I cannot see how that could be true. (19 Islamic terrorists)
(1)(ii)
No cave direction involved.
(b) Yes, because it could not have been an exclusively outside job.
(i) Let it happen? No.
(ii)
The "administration" are puppets of the puppetmasters who "made it happen"
(2) The videos are
(a) A few of the videos that we have appear to be authentic.
(b) Most of the videos that we have appear to be faked, and in fact can be said by video experts to be definitely faked. We will never have the unfaked videos if there is not independent investigation.
(i) flying what'sits at the North Tower
I remember seeing one video that was said by the expert to be authentic that did appear to have a genuine What'sit flying in to the North Tower.
(ii) CGIs, compositing, or holograms at the South
Yes, all that and perhaps more.
(3) The "collapse" of the Twin Towers
Most definitions of the word "collapse" inclue the word "down" and convey the concept of a gravitational destruction. The Twin Towers did not "collapse." They were blown to Kingdom Come. They were "dustified."
(i) actually happened as the official account claims
No. Official account cannot possibly be true.
(ii) represented a demolition under control
Yes it was a demolition or destruction under the control of human agents. "Controlled demolition" is a generic term that does not necessarily mean involvement of placed "explosives."
(a) possible Themite / conventional explosives would have had to be in addition to some other main destruction agent.
(b) Yes, "unconventional method(s)" was main destruction agent.
Views: 14
About
© 2025 Created by James H. Fetzer.
Powered by
