Part II Jeannon Kralj Survey Response

[Jeannon Kralj]

Part II  - Jeannon Kralj Survey Response

 

 

(4) I guess we can use the word "collapse" with Building 7 because the building came "down."

 

(a)

No.  NIST claims "collateral damage" set off fires and a series of events that resulted in the "collapse" of Building 7.  NIST is able to find "experts" and "scientists" who can create computer models that support this unsupportable position.

 

 

(b)

No.  A "classic" controlled demolition does not explain the "evidence" we have.

 

(5)

(a)

No.  Photo of the original hole in the Pentagon and the adjacent grounds rules out Boeing 757.

 

(b)

Possibly, but we just have no evidence.

 

(c)

Possibly, but we just have no evidence.

 

 

(6) Shanksville crash

 

(a)

Sometimes our government does tell us some really funny jokes, and we can be thankful for that.

 

(b)

Yes, no Shanksville crash at all.

 

 

(7) 

The "missing people" maybe cannot be described as "passengers"
Emerging facts point to their being never having been any "passengers" at all.

 

(a) they were killed in the plane crashes

We do not know and we do not have to know.

(b)

Seems stupid not to kill disappeared "passengers".

 

(c)

"Mostly fabricated" "passengers" =emerging picture.  There are real people who are missing.

 

Where movement should go ...

 

Seek true USA investigation of the highest order.  Only have to justify investigation need on fact that official story cannot possibly be true.