The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Seven: Why NIST’s Final 9/11 Report is Unscientific and False by Prof. David Ray Griffin - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-28T17:16:41Zhttps://911scholars.ning.com/forum/topics/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc?feed=yes&xn_auth=no"According to the National Sc…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-01-27:3488444:Comment:101022011-01-27T22:17:43.000ZThoth IIhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>"According to the National Science Foundation, the major types of scientific fraud are fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. There is no sign that NIST is guilty of plagiarism, but it is certainly guilty of fabrication, which can be defined as “making up results,” and falsification, which means either “changing or omitting data.” </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm afraid this is too true. Scientists do not take a hippocratic oath to uphold integrity of their work, although the vast majority are in…</p>
<p>"According to the National Science Foundation, the major types of scientific fraud are fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. There is no sign that NIST is guilty of plagiarism, but it is certainly guilty of fabrication, which can be defined as “making up results,” and falsification, which means either “changing or omitting data.” </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm afraid this is too true. Scientists do not take a hippocratic oath to uphold integrity of their work, although the vast majority are in science for honest reasons. But take a typical scientist who works for NIST, which means his livelihood is earned through NIST. Does he wake up in the morning and say, "I'm going to be honest for the good of the country and I don't care what my bosses tell me? " I'm afraid not. </p>