9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Latest articles and presentations about 9/11 . . .

Here are my latest articles and presentations about 9/11.  I have done quite a few radio interviews, too, which are archived at http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com, although some of them are probably not up yet.  Comments welcome!

"James H. Fetzer:  Mossad Played a Crucial Role in 9/11 Attacks"

"9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings I"

"9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II"

(1) "Ideology, Israel and 9/11"

(2) Just before The Vancouver Hearings, I presented this in Seattle:

"Were the 9/11 crash sites faked?" (13 June 2012):
Part 1
Part 2

(3) "9/11 J'accuse: Zelikow, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, and O'Brien" by Jim Fetzer
(4) "9/11: Confessions of a former CIA Asset" by Susan Lindauer (with Jim Fetzer)

(5) "9/11 and Zion: What was Israel's role?", by Nick Kollerstrom (with Jim Fetzer)

(6) "Judy Wood and DEWs:  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" (with Don Fox)

Views: 161


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on September 27, 2012 at 10:30am

and nukes make infinite sense when you consider the power involved.  In a post from the time of the debate with Morgan, I calculted that it would take A HOOVER'S DAM WORTH OF POWER;  what could possibly deliver that kind of power but nukes?  We've known since Einstein's day that nukes are capable of great power like this.  DEWs, are used in small power apps, but no way would they be capable of pulverizing a tower in 10 seconds, no way,  no way

Comment by Thoth II on September 27, 2012 at 10:26am

from Vancouver II reference:

 that the mini and micro-nuke theory confers the highest probability on the observable evidence and thus qualifies as the preferable alternative.  While I do not deny that the possibility remains that DEWs may have played a contributing role, there is no room for doubt that the principal causal mechanism for the destruction of the Twin Towers was mini or mico nukes


Comment by Thoth II on September 20, 2012 at 5:53pm

"Chuck’s work is that he has come to the conclusion that mini or micro nukes IN COMBINATION WITH thermite/thermate/nanothermite could account for all of the effects that were observed on 9/11, including the so-called “toasted cars”, as he explains in his presentations, including “Answering Judy Wood’s ‘Must Answer’ Questions”, found on the Scholars forum."


This is where Chuck has been the big guns:  he realized that this was a highly sophisticated, tailored demolition that required mix and match and state of art techniques;  not the old rough load and blow inefficient techniques that Morgan talks about.  And I think the Mossad and their art student dupes did a lot of the heavy lifting while some extremely sophisticated ad hoc committee of demolition experts did the heavy research.

Comment by Thoth II on September 20, 2012 at 10:35am

"Her definition of a “DEW” is simply a device that produces far greater energy than conventional explosives, which can be directed,"

she never developed her idea, just put it out there. 

© 2023   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service