My own personal experience with 911blogger confirms the view that it has long been operating to suppress dissenting opinions from its own narrow-minded take on 9/11. I was given the book years ago for raising questions about the thermite theory of Stephen Jones, which I do not
believe can account for the conversional of the Twin Towers into
millions of cubic yards of very fine dust. And I am the founder of
Scholars for 9/11 Truth, where Steve was my pick for my original
co-chair. Kevin Barrett, prominent 9/11 activist and co-founder (with
A.K. Dewdney) of Muslims for 9/11 Truth was also later given the book.
In relation to the work by CIT, I am on their side where their research
has substantiated the findings of PIlots for 9/11 Truth, namely, that a
Boeing 757 flew toward the building on a due east trajectory but was too
high to take out any of the lampposts and flew over the building
instead of hitting it. Read my "What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon", for
example, for substantiation. Those who have attacked CIT, including
Arabesque, Jim Hoffman, and Victoria Ashley, are some of those who have
attacked me repeatedly over the years. See, for example, two rebuttals I
published exposing Jim Hoffman's modus operandi, namely, "The Company
You are Keeping: Comments on Hoffman and Green", http://www.911scholars.org/Fetzer_9Feb2006.html , and "What's the matter
with Jim Hoffman? Abusing logic and language to attack Scholars for
9/11 Truth", http://www.911scholars.org/ArticleFetzer_14Jun2006.html .
911blogger is not the only prominent web site that appears to be
committed to distorting or misrepresenting the movement. See, for
example, "Wikipedia as a 9/11 Disinformation Op", http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_6078.shtml ; Congratulations to The Rock Creek Free Press for exposing this charade.
You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!
Join 9/11 Scholars Forum