Comments - More Good Stuff (Pro and Con) DEW and the Damage to the WTC . . . - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T02:28:15Zhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A10043&xn_auth=noThoth said "I believe that mi…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-01-23:3488444:Comment:100552011-01-23T17:43:51.000ZMehmet Inanhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/MehmetInan
<p>Thoth said "I believe that mini nukes could still be invoked as an explanation for the desstruction of twin towers."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You reached the top level of disinfo. Mini nuclear bombs could difintely not be used to demolish the towers as it happened. There were no some ten or twenty strong bombs, but there were thousands of small explosives that were triggered sequentially to demolish the towers. All evidence proves that. Any bigger bomb or individual bombs are totally and…</p>
<p>Thoth said "I believe that mini nukes could still be invoked as an explanation for the desstruction of twin towers."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You reached the top level of disinfo. Mini nuclear bombs could difintely not be used to demolish the towers as it happened. There were no some ten or twenty strong bombs, but there were thousands of small explosives that were triggered sequentially to demolish the towers. All evidence proves that. Any bigger bomb or individual bombs are totally and definitely false.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The first people who understood the manner how the towers were demolished was Van Romero! He made that after he watched the videos of teh collapse to answer the questions of a journalist. Even if he changed his opinion, for what any reason it could be, he deserves congratulations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If ten years after that, some so called scholars do not undersatnd the first opinion of Van Romero and they apropagate so many false crazy theories, that simply means those scholars are propagating disinfo. Their only will is creating confusion to make the events impossible to understand.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It's time to repeat the false disinfo theories that scholars are propagating:</p>
<p>- No Plane Theory: Totally debunked.<br/>- Directed Energy Weapon: Totally debunked.<br/>- Missile or military plane on the Pentagon: Totally debunked.<br/>- Mini nuke bomb demolishing each tower: Totally debunked.<br/>- Hydrogen bomb demolishing each tower: Totally debunked.<br/><br/></p> Jack:
"
This would indicate…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2011-01-22:3488444:Comment:100472011-01-22T17:19:30.000ZThoth IIhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>Jack:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"</p>
<div>This would indicate some energy </div>
<div>source of great power but negligible heat."</div>
<div>I sure give you credit , man, I saw you offering great commentary as early as the TMWKK series for the BBC. I believe that mini nukes could still be invoked as an explanation for the desstruction of twin towers. There is a concept in physical chemistry called "latent heat" such as the heat required to convert, say, liquid water into steam (540 cal/g), that…</div>
<p>Jack:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"</p>
<div>This would indicate some energy </div>
<div>source of great power but negligible heat."</div>
<div>I sure give you credit , man, I saw you offering great commentary as early as the TMWKK series for the BBC. I believe that mini nukes could still be invoked as an explanation for the desstruction of twin towers. There is a concept in physical chemistry called "latent heat" such as the heat required to convert, say, liquid water into steam (540 cal/g), that absorbs all the energy to break the molecular bonds, but DOES NOT increase the temperature during the phase transition. I believe 10-15 mini nukes buried near the core columns of the towers would have been akin to this latent heat situation. It would have taken a great deal of energy to pulverize the towers into about 60 micron sized dust particles, Frank Greening cites a certain amount of energy to do this. All the energy would have been absorbed in the pulverization process, and none would be left over to increase the temperature. Thus mini nukes would be consistent with your above cited observation.</div>
<div>I never believed in DEW simply because of the symmetric ejection of fragments from the central core outward, DEW would have had a net momentum from the outside that would have caused assymetric ejection; plus I am very skeptical DEW would have absorbed into the steel, RF frequencies don't like metals, try putting a spoon into your microwave.</div>
<p></p>