Comments - September Coup - 9/11 Scholars Forum2024-03-29T13:48:30Zhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=3488444%3ABlogPost%3A45172&xn_auth=noJim - I like the topics, the…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-12:3488444:Comment:455502012-01-12T22:21:34.064ZDeanhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Dean
<p>Jim - I like the topics, the format and the price.</p>
<p>Jim - I like the topics, the format and the price.</p> good,
that is your answer to…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-11:3488444:Comment:456152012-01-11T22:02:32.871ZThoth IIhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>good,</p>
<p></p>
<p>that is your answer to the phony Toronto hearings. It's good that the philosophical approach: understanding how to apply critical thinking, avoidance of logical fallacies, application of scientific method, and not getting sucked down the ego/hero worship game: it's good that side of 911 truth will be represented in this conference.</p>
<p>It's about time. </p>
<p>good,</p>
<p></p>
<p>that is your answer to the phony Toronto hearings. It's good that the philosophical approach: understanding how to apply critical thinking, avoidance of logical fallacies, application of scientific method, and not getting sucked down the ego/hero worship game: it's good that side of 911 truth will be represented in this conference.</p>
<p>It's about time. </p> I am organizing The Vancouver…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:456132012-01-10T23:53:24.387ZJames H. Fetzerhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JamesHFetzer
<p>I am organizing The Vancouver Hearings for 15-17 June 2012. The opening session will be devoted to how the Twin Towers were destroyed, with three speakers on this subject: Chuck Boldwyn, the guy from last night's show, and Dwain Deets. It should be fascinating. We will discuss video fakery, were there any hijackers?, who was responsible, and the failure of the media to cover this event. Each with three speakers of 40 minutes and an hour allocated for discussion. How does that sound?…</p>
<p>I am organizing The Vancouver Hearings for 15-17 June 2012. The opening session will be devoted to how the Twin Towers were destroyed, with three speakers on this subject: Chuck Boldwyn, the guy from last night's show, and Dwain Deets. It should be fascinating. We will discuss video fakery, were there any hijackers?, who was responsible, and the failure of the media to cover this event. Each with three speakers of 40 minutes and an hour allocated for discussion. How does that sound? Probably $25 for the three days or $10 for one.</p> Jeannon,
I completely agree.…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:458062012-01-10T22:52:32.994ZThoth IIhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>Jeannon,</p>
<p></p>
<p>I completely agree. However, in the case of Chuck Boldwyn, I assure you he HAS made solid scientific links between the data and his hypothesis. He has a full scientific poster board on this forum somewhere. It is not a final theory , of course, but the most promising H in my opinion. Sometimes the data set is a bit short, mainly because the perps of course made sure they either demolished or faked most of it. </p>
<p>Jeannon,</p>
<p></p>
<p>I completely agree. However, in the case of Chuck Boldwyn, I assure you he HAS made solid scientific links between the data and his hypothesis. He has a full scientific poster board on this forum somewhere. It is not a final theory , of course, but the most promising H in my opinion. Sometimes the data set is a bit short, mainly because the perps of course made sure they either demolished or faked most of it. </p> I listened to the first 30 mi…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:456122012-01-10T22:28:08.822ZJeannon Kraljhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/JeannonKralj
<p>I listened to the first 30 minutes of the show with the electrical engineer guest last evening on Dr. Fetzer's radio show. I thought the guest did a great job of introducing his subject and explaining things on layman's terms.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However, I realized I would not be able to really understand this fully and decided not to listen to the whole show. I am just wondering if that EE basically supported Dr. Wood's ideas. I do know he was very complimentary of her book at the beginning…</p>
<p>I listened to the first 30 minutes of the show with the electrical engineer guest last evening on Dr. Fetzer's radio show. I thought the guest did a great job of introducing his subject and explaining things on layman's terms.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However, I realized I would not be able to really understand this fully and decided not to listen to the whole show. I am just wondering if that EE basically supported Dr. Wood's ideas. I do know he was very complimentary of her book at the beginning of the show.</p>
<p>I would basically agree with Thoth and his observations, but I would comment that no one, not Dr. Wood, not Dr. Jones, no one, has promulgated a true scientific hypothesis. I know we use the words hypothesis and theory loosely on one level, but that in science, they have a much stricter meaning. From my vantage point, there is not enough solid true evidence, not just data, to be able to formulate a true scientific hypothesis.</p>
<p>I am disappointed in both Dr. Wood's as well as Dr. Jones' manner of communicating their ideas. I could use various words to descibe their communications, but generally would say that they have not been completely transparent and forthright.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p> Danny,
I totally agree about…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:457022012-01-10T22:12:07.365ZThoth IIhttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ThothII
<p>Danny,</p>
<p></p>
<p>I totally agree about energy of a vacuum, so called free energy. It is very easy to throw ideas like those out there, but that is ATM (against the mainstream science) and must undergo much, much more research for us to take it seriously. Which is why I am skeptical of Judy Wood and her Hurricane Erin/Hutch effect contributing to destruction of twin tower, she hasn't developed it.</p>
<p>Danny,</p>
<p></p>
<p>I totally agree about energy of a vacuum, so called free energy. It is very easy to throw ideas like those out there, but that is ATM (against the mainstream science) and must undergo much, much more research for us to take it seriously. Which is why I am skeptical of Judy Wood and her Hurricane Erin/Hutch effect contributing to destruction of twin tower, she hasn't developed it.</p> Shallel: Thanks for the intro…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:457012012-01-10T07:00:03.593ZDanny Whitehttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/DannyWhite
<p>Shallel: Thanks for the introduction to Nassim Haramein. I've watched his videos one time, and was really impressed with his graphics and presentation .... but I'm afraid I still have a little trouble with the vacuum stuff,</p>
<p>and I still believe in the cubic lattice instead of the Israeli flag for God sakes. I'll watch his stuff again when I get</p>
<p>back home. The triad idea of classic packing theory runs into a problem when you think in terms of images</p>
<p>propagating through…</p>
<p>Shallel: Thanks for the introduction to Nassim Haramein. I've watched his videos one time, and was really impressed with his graphics and presentation .... but I'm afraid I still have a little trouble with the vacuum stuff,</p>
<p>and I still believe in the cubic lattice instead of the Israeli flag for God sakes. I'll watch his stuff again when I get</p>
<p>back home. The triad idea of classic packing theory runs into a problem when you think in terms of images</p>
<p>propagating through the matrix. The cubic lattice allows for pixels to stay together in an orderly way, and for</p>
<p>images to cross each other on their journey through space. For the Hubble to focus on a galaxy 14 billion</p>
<p>light years away, the pixels have to travel in lock-step, all propagating through the matrix at exactly the speed</p>
<p>of light ..... and arriving on the lens in the same arrangement as they left their source long before. Anything else is distortion of some kind. Einstein believed in bending space and keeping light straight. Being electromagnetic, it makes more sense to let the sun's gravity bend the light and leave space (the grid) straight.</p> Hi Danny, I will look for you…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:457002012-01-10T03:45:41.949ZShallel Octaviahttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/Shallel
<p>Hi Danny, I will look for your site, it sounds like you've had some interesting background. I worked prototyping large scale surveillance equipment, but didn't dig the corporate thing so I went on my own specializing in sound, video and digital lighting systems and acoustic design, (and repaired my share of TV's!) I also record and play music and do live sound mixing. I had the great opportunity to present Nassim at Walter Russell's former mansion. His understanding of "Wholeness" allowed…</p>
<p>Hi Danny, I will look for your site, it sounds like you've had some interesting background. I worked prototyping large scale surveillance equipment, but didn't dig the corporate thing so I went on my own specializing in sound, video and digital lighting systems and acoustic design, (and repaired my share of TV's!) I also record and play music and do live sound mixing. I had the great opportunity to present Nassim at Walter Russell's former mansion. His understanding of "Wholeness" allowed him to come up with a universal scaling law, which is very elegant proof of the Unification of Physical Theory at all scales.</p>
<p>It is simple geometry to prove that there is infinite information in a bounded region of space as there are infinitely many discrete points. See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzbIHiedESQ&feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzbIHiedESQ&feature=related</a> [@ 12:00 minutes in]. This infinite information of the vacuum gives rise to infinite energy and infinite mass. Quantum physicists re-normalized an infinite quantity so their math wouldn't be made impossible by "nasty infinity". This explains the schism between macro physics and the quantum. In the volume contained in a proton there is more gravitational energy due to mass than the electrostatic repulsion of other protons. In classic quantum physics, the Strong Force is a created force set equal to the electrostatic repulsion, and thus explains the nucleus not flying apart, but the force is just a construct. The vacuum is seething with energy and information, which has instantaneous non local information about every part of itself, the mulitiverse. Matter continually flips in and out of the vacuum, on the quantum scale as well as the macro, including superclusters and Universes. This explains "spooky action at a distance" and the particle/wave conundrum. The Casimir Effect is one example of vacuum fluctuations, where longer wavelengths of the vacuum energy are filtered out between the plates and incur a force pushing the plates together, as the longer wavelengths only push on the outer surfaces. I hope you enjoy Haramein's videos - he explains it much better than I, and is quite entertaining. Jim's show today was very good - hopefully it will be posted soon!</p>
<p></p>
<p>Best, Shallel </p>
<p></p>
<p><b>(PART 1) Nassim Haramein at the Rogue Valley Metaphysical Library. 2003. :</b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79_HwQ-92f8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79_HwQ-92f8</a></b></p>
<p><b><br/></b></p> Shallel: I would like to add…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-10:3488444:Comment:455392012-01-10T00:16:31.198ZDanny Whitehttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/DannyWhite
<p>Shallel: I would like to add that the definition of vacuum is lack of all matter .... therefore no energy. I believe all</p>
<p>that exist are space (place to put something) and energy. A theoretical perfect vacuum would have to be void of</p>
<p> energy of its own but allow energy of certain wavelengths to pass through it,without disturbing its nothingness.</p>
<p>Gravity means that if you go out in theoretical empty space with no mass anywhere, and turn loose two grains</p>
<p>of sand…</p>
<p>Shallel: I would like to add that the definition of vacuum is lack of all matter .... therefore no energy. I believe all</p>
<p>that exist are space (place to put something) and energy. A theoretical perfect vacuum would have to be void of</p>
<p> energy of its own but allow energy of certain wavelengths to pass through it,without disturbing its nothingness.</p>
<p>Gravity means that if you go out in theoretical empty space with no mass anywhere, and turn loose two grains</p>
<p>of sand a distance apart without imparting any momentum on them .... and then sneak away without them</p>
<p>knowing ..... the mass of each grain attracts the other, and they will eventually clump together. All mass attracts all other mass. All energy attracts all other energy. I'm sure you already knew that. On the incandescence of the explosions in the towers,</p>
<p>possibly the light was obscured by the falling debris. It looks to me like whole floor panels were falling, and turning to dust on the way down .... blocking any view of the inside. I would like to see the infrared videos of the towers being turned to dust. I suspect it would have looked like the 4th of July.</p> Shallel: While Energy of the…tag:911scholars.ning.com,2012-01-09:3488444:Comment:458042012-01-09T21:45:26.643ZDanny Whitehttps://911scholars.ning.com/profile/DannyWhite
<p>Shallel: While Energy of the Vacuum sounds cool, I don't buy it. Thanks for turning me on to the Resonance</p>
<p>Project. Gravity and a Unified Field Theory have been my hobby since the early eighties. I started electronics in</p>
<p>the Air Farce as a 30454 Ground Radio Tech .... I studied on my own and got a 1st Class FCC license, worked several electronic tech jobs including TV repair, and wound up as TV broadcast Engineer and Field</p>
<p>Service for switcher manufacturer GVG. I…</p>
<p>Shallel: While Energy of the Vacuum sounds cool, I don't buy it. Thanks for turning me on to the Resonance</p>
<p>Project. Gravity and a Unified Field Theory have been my hobby since the early eighties. I started electronics in</p>
<p>the Air Farce as a 30454 Ground Radio Tech .... I studied on my own and got a 1st Class FCC license, worked several electronic tech jobs including TV repair, and wound up as TV broadcast Engineer and Field</p>
<p>Service for switcher manufacturer GVG. I am basically mathematically illiterate past college algebra. I think</p>
<p>the problem was ADD or something. During a hiatus between jobs (Silicon Valley), I had time to ponder about</p>
<p>physics things for a little while. Thinking about how images propagate through space ... I realized how as you look at something in the distance the pixels have to stick together through space on their way to your eyes. I</p>
<p>also realized the farther off something is, the farther back in time you're seeing. I tried to figure how the pixels</p>
<p>could stick together though space, and came up with what I called my "Ball Theory". I realized if you take two</p>
<p>coins say, and turn one against the other .... they go in opposite directions. Like I say, I had a lot of time on my hands. A little later, I discovered that if you draw four circles in a square pattern and start turning one, half</p>
<p>turn the same way and half backwards. By imagining a three-dimensional grid of these balls with a little "slip"</p>
<p>(electromagnetic field), you can see how an image might propagate through there. Later on down the line, I got</p>
<p>to thinking about charges on the balls, and voila ..... Draw four circles in a square pattern with a little space in</p>
<p>between .... add curved arrows inside circles to indicate spin .... call one direction positive if you like, and the other negative. You will see that the four corners all attract each other (GRAVITY), and opposite corners</p>
<p>repel each other (anti-gravity). You can turn any ball on any axis, and it affects all the other balls. This works</p>
<p>for polarized light, as well as everything in physics .... I think. I sort of lost interest in this sort of thing when</p>
<p>9/11 happened. I can't do much else with what I've described without a PHD in physics and publishing, etc.</p>
<p>I hope someone else can figure out how to make anti-gravity cars and such. I never could figure out how to get</p>
<p>my "lifters" to work .... ha ..... I don't want to just tell my life story and distract our 9/11 quest, but I just wanted to explain why I don't believe in black holes or black wholes and zero-point energy. I actually believe</p>
<p>more in white holes if anything. I too look forward to Dr Fetzer's interview with the EE tonight. I'll be gone for a</p>
<p>day, but will catch up when I get back. Maybe it would be better taking this physics stuff somewhere else, so as not to distract attention. My website is "birdrop" on StumbleUpon, where I have tried to explain my theory of life in less than 500 words .... ha .... cheers .... Danny</p>