THE DESTRUCTION

2014-09-20T21:32:18.081Z

Most eyewitnesses saw no planes hitting the

towers, only large explosions. All the plane

crap originated with the TV networks and with actors being interviewed by the TV

networks. A hollow aluminum plane can't

fly through a steel and concrete…

Flight 175 (rare video)

2013-09-13T15:00:12.426Z

http://www.truthin7minutes.com/alert?PC=YT-description-flight-175 This video demonstrates how the news media faked the 9/11 terror plot...

The Great American Psy-Opera by Ace Baker

2012-08-05T18:14:13.459Z

Most compelling, scientific, and well written and performed Musical Docudrama on the glaring falsehoods of the official fairy-tale.

Fake Videos Alters Eyewitness Accounts (9/11 TV Fakery)

2011-02-20T17:59:22.864Z

Researchers at the University of Warwick have found that fake video evidence can dramatically alter people's perceptions of events, even convincing them to t...

Introduction to Momentum (Example of Inelastic Collision, where neither vehicle is anchored but each is on wheels and can roll after collision occurs)

2010-12-11T18:49:30.000Z

What momentum is. A simple problem involving momentum.

If the Truck was anchored into the ground the collision would lead to much damage of the car and the rear of the truck as their masses are not many, many times different, as was the case with the Twin Towers and the Jetliner.

Tower weight = 500,000,000 Kg
Tower velocity = 0 m/s

Jet weight = 130,000 Kg
Jet velocity = 223 m/s = 500mph

Tower is 500,000,000/130,000 = 3,846 times as heavy as Jet.

The 6 floors the Jet hit is 209 times a heavy as the Jet if using equal weight distribution as does the NIST & physics advocates.

Consider that the Tower is not on wheels, so it will be an in-elastic collision with the Jet suffering instant massive damage/annialation, outside of the Tower, exploding outside of the Tower, if indeed an explosion takes place. If not an explosion, the plane will crumple and fall to the ground with some damage to the Tower.
That is what I would estimate should have happened on 911.
Possibly the Jet would imbed itself within the wall of the Tower, but not be able to penetrate the wall...which is backed by 6 acres of about 8 inches thick concrete flooring, much more weight and material that the Jet that crashed into the concrete wall in the following video:

http://911scholars.ning.com/video/jet-crash-into-wall-at-over

The 6 floor of concrete is:
(6 x 8 inches) = 48 inches = 4 feet of height of concrete that is 208 feet thick from its total area and volume of the 6 floor of concrete. Think about it and the rediculous of this Jet crushing of Tower impossibility...

The Jet does not just have to get throuth the steel wall, it must also get through the, at least, 6 floors of concrete and through the steel column of the core, pushing through a weight that is at least 209 times a heavy as the Jet, or about 4,000 times its weight is the entire Tower is considered.

You eyes and brain can be fooled by faked video since you have been trained to accept video as reality, which in this case the 911 crash video have to be digitally modified, had to be, must have been...

All Videos Tagged video (9/11 Scholars Forum) - 9/11 Scholars Forum

THE DESTRUCTION

Flight 175 (rare video)

The Great American Psy-Opera by Ace Baker

Fake Videos Alters Eyewitness Accounts (9/11 TV Fakery)

Introduction to Momentum (Example of Inelastic Collision, where neither vehicle is anchored but each is on wheels and can roll after collision occurs)