Whathappened, Would it be possible to post a photo of you and give us just a bit more information about you? This forum has one basic rule, which is mutual respect. I am asking for photos but being liberal about it. Would it be too much to have an actual name to go with them? Email me at jfetzer@d.umn.edu if you like. If there is something special about your situation, I would like to know.
Jim...there are several others also. I believe Killtown has a reason to be excused from posting photos, but you should ask the same question of some others.
After some experimentation, I am finding that I lke the format and it is not as hard to navigate as I thought. I did find that to post links that work, one must enter the full HTTP address.
I have started a thread on BUILDING SIX, which I think deserves a lot of discussion.
Thank for providing this site. It needs a few more of the better researchers. I would like to see Judy Wood, as well as reps from Pilots, Architects and Engineers, and other leading sites.
Yes, I agree across the board. If Whathappened is Judy or someone else with a good reason, I will not insist that she further identify herself. But I personally need to know who is here. If you want to suggest some possibilities or extend them an invitation yourself, please do that, Jack. I am very glad you are here.
What did not happen at WTC: 1. no Boeing passenger jets flew into either tower because no parts were found 2. gravity did not "collapse" the towers.
3. the videos cannot be showing real planes hitting the south tower because they violate Newton's laws. The possibility of fake videos , compositing, or something technical like that; or maybe a hologram, exists.
What did happen at WTC: 1. the towers were turned to fine dust in a matter of seconds
So the researchers are trying to explain above with the exact techniques that were used.
no planes were hijacked
no planes crashed into buildings
videos of the day do not depict plane crashes
the planes in the video just melted into the buildings
they didn't bounce off the buildings
so something about the videos is obviously fake
Stephen E. Jones is the most feted of all 9/11 researchers,
but he is a damn smiling liar
i don't care if he has a friendly demeanor
his thermite theory is a fake trail
thermite doesn't explode, it burns
thermite isn't an explosive, it's an incendiary
don't tell me about nano-spray-on-thermite unless
you've got a youtube video showing that it turns
a building into dust
thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air
the WTC DID NOT COLLAPSE
the WTC buildings exploded
they exploded into very fine dust,
much of which shot directly up into the sky
that idiot Jones is talking about how he scraped
the Hudson River and found thermitic material
HEY JONES ---> were you able to sample the
stuff that went directly up into the air and never
came to the ground?
what happened to the wtc was an unusual process
we don't have the words in our common vocabulary
yet to express what this process was
before Hiroshima, very few people knew about atomic
bombs or would have had the proper vocabulary to
describe one should they have witnessed one going off
Judy Wood was right about his and a multitude of other things
what happened at the wtc was the new hiroshima
a new weapon using a new technology
the most hopeful thing i can take out of the many years of
sadness and destruction that has come because of 9/11
is that after we uncover the criminals
we can use their technology
James H. Fetzer
Jul 5, 2009
Jack D. White
After some experimentation, I am finding that I lke the format and it is not as hard to navigate as I thought. I did find that to post links that work, one must enter the full HTTP address.
I have started a thread on BUILDING SIX, which I think deserves a lot of discussion.
Thank for providing this site. It needs a few more of the better researchers. I would like to see Judy Wood, as well as reps from Pilots, Architects and Engineers, and other leading sites.
Jack
Jul 5, 2009
James H. Fetzer
Jul 5, 2009
James H. Fetzer
Jul 6, 2009
Whathappened Tothewtc
i used the icon because too many people get into WHO did it when we don't know WHAT happened
Jul 6, 2009
Thoth II
3. the videos cannot be showing real planes hitting the south tower because they violate Newton's laws. The possibility of fake videos , compositing, or something technical like that; or maybe a hologram, exists.
What did happen at WTC: 1. the towers were turned to fine dust in a matter of seconds
So the researchers are trying to explain above with the exact techniques that were used.
Jul 6, 2009
Whathappened Tothewtc
julie: you're mostly talking about who did it, the "who" and the "why"
On a certain level, i don't really care who did it. When we find out what really happened, we will know who did it.
Jul 8, 2009
Whathappened Tothewtc
if i'm ever rude to someone or post lies, that's a reason not to like me
otherwise say hi to Killtown and others
Jul 13, 2009
Whathappened Tothewtc
my views on 9/11:
no planes were hijacked
no planes crashed into buildings
videos of the day do not depict plane crashes
the planes in the video just melted into the buildings
they didn't bounce off the buildings
so something about the videos is obviously fake
Stephen E. Jones is the most feted of all 9/11 researchers,
but he is a damn smiling liar
i don't care if he has a friendly demeanor
his thermite theory is a fake trail
thermite doesn't explode, it burns
thermite isn't an explosive, it's an incendiary
don't tell me about nano-spray-on-thermite unless
you've got a youtube video showing that it turns
a building into dust
thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air
the WTC DID NOT COLLAPSE
the WTC buildings exploded
they exploded into very fine dust,
much of which shot directly up into the sky
that idiot Jones is talking about how he scraped
the Hudson River and found thermitic material
HEY JONES ---> were you able to sample the
stuff that went directly up into the air and never
came to the ground?
what happened to the wtc was an unusual process
we don't have the words in our common vocabulary
yet to express what this process was
before Hiroshima, very few people knew about atomic
bombs or would have had the proper vocabulary to
describe one should they have witnessed one going off
Judy Wood was right about his and a multitude of other things
what happened at the wtc was the new hiroshima
a new weapon using a new technology
the most hopeful thing i can take out of the many years of
sadness and destruction that has come because of 9/11
is that after we uncover the criminals
we can use their technology
it's big
the real weapon is the real search
Jul 13, 2009