All members are requested to read Neils Harrit's Thermite/Thermate paper and respond with your knowledgeable opinion as to why it is correct or not so correct...

[Chuck Boldwyn]

Neils Harrit

PHD Chemistry

University of Copenhagen, Denmark

 

 

 

Please go to the following link to read and analyze the PDF paper.

 

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

 

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
by: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen Pp 7-31

 

Without a Scientific background in Chemistry, Physics, and Instrumental Analysis Methodology, this may be difficult to, perhaps, impossible to do, in terms of understanding all of the details.

 

But all of you should be able to understand the "gist" of the scientific paper...

 

By the way, most scientific journals may be considered to be dominated by the same organizations that support the Government's Theory and the majority of America's mass media publications. Publishing this information would raise the "ire" and "bad mouthing" of the main stream media. Notice that the main stream media has boycotted this material and censored it from all TV, Radio, Newspapers, Magazines, Books, etc., etc. Why would they do that if they were not deadly afraid of the "expose" content?

 

I believe that this paper and what it contains is the real, factual thing and that many people are missing the boat on this, mainly due to their lack of hard-core scientific background or knowledge.

 

This paper is one of the finest scientific papers I have ever read and I do not beleive that the data and evidence was falsified or exaggerated in any way, unless someone has the ability to prove otherwise.

 

So all of you who cannot  or will not accept the Thermite Theory, I feel, need to take another look, a deeper analytical look, at it.

 

Are all of these Scientists lying?

Are all of these Scientists mistaken?

Are all of these Scientists incompetent?

 

Without Thermite or some form of it, it is near impossible to explain the molten metal in the 3 Tower's lowest basement floors for 3+ months.

And without Thermite it is near impossible to explain the "toasted" carsand melted engines, except, possibly, with the combined blasts of the mini-nukes, which I no longer accept, at least at this point, in the long, ongoing citizen's invetigations. Thermite can easily explain both of the totally unanswered questions on the molten metal and the toasted and melted cars.

 

 

Chuck Boldwyn

[Thoth II]

"Without Thermite or some form of it, it is near impossible to explain the molten metal in the 3 Tower's lowest basement floors for 3+ months.
And without Thermite it is near impossible to explain the "toasted" carsand melted engines, except, possibly, with the combined blasts of the mini-nukes, which I no longer accept, at least at this point, in the long, ongoing citizen's invetigations. Thermite can easily explain both of the totally unanswered questions on the molten metal and the toasted and melted cars."

I just don't agree that there is strong evidence of large pools of molten metal in the 3 towers lowest basement floors for 3 months. I haven't seen this evidence. I think 911 researchers should further investigate this and lay this issue to rest. If there are no pools of molten metal, the ball game is over for the thermite proponents. I've seen Judy wood website pics with responders in the basements and also pools of water (not steaming) in the basements. That seems to point against molten metal.

As for the toasted cars, I would assert that gamma rays emitted from mininukes could explain that. Gamma rays would be preferentially absorbed in high-Z materials like engine blocks, and to a lesser extent in the car frames, it seems that is consistent with the evidence.

I'm not a chemist like Harrit , so I won't pretend to understand his paper.

Still, I think Harrit is honest. I heard him strongly take on and kick butt in the debate with Ian Punnett against Dave Thomas. He made good points in that debate.