9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Coast To Coast AM to interview Dr. Judy Wood on May 3, tomorrow

Dr. Judy Wood to guest on Coast To Coast AM

9-11 & Energy Weapons

Coast To Coast AM

Radio Show


Date: 05-03-11
Host: George Noory
Guests: Judy D. Wood

Former professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University, Dr. Judy Wood will discuss how the destruction of buildings in NYC on 9-11 was the result of directed energy technology, not planes, fire, thermite or bombs.

Website(s):
Book(s):

Judy D. Wood

Biography:

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

Views: 36

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

She's ignoring Chuck's scientific refutations of her questions, this is not good.  Just more misinformation, more confusion for an already ignorant public.  

This Coast to Coast show with Dr. Wood as guest can be listened to online at

 

http://www.590klbj.com/#

 

at 11: pm Central Time tonight.

 

Not sure I am going to stay up for this.  It might be worth it to listen to Chuck call in but knowing Noory, Chuck's call won't be taken, or if taken, Chuck will be treated rudely and promptly dismissed.

I listened to this coast to coast broadcast last night, and it was no surprise, it's essentially the things she's already said.

 

In short, I am more convinced than ever that she is on the wrong track with DEW/Hutch/Hurricane and I believe she is resorting to junk science or at least not well thought out science.  

 

Just some highlights:

1. she reiterated that she uses her own terms like "fumes" because the phenemon is unknown .  This is probably ok, but at some point we need to link these terms to a real scientific principle, such as Chuck has done in showing that this fuming is really a by-product of a thermitic reaction, aluminum oxide.

2. she made the point about thermite not being explosive and then talked about pressure vessels like air tanks exploding.  But probably most of the explosive force was made by mini nukes.

3. she remarked that the Hutch effect was remarkably similar to phenomenon seen at WTC, and claims it is the same mechanism.  But this is so vague as to be useless.  

4. she remarked about spontaneous combustion a distance from towers, but no observed heat in the dust clouds.

5. she also talked about torsional weather phenomeonon and field effects felt on  911.  I am a little concerned with this terminology because it is very similar to the way someone I regard as a quak uses: Richard Hoagland.  

Guess you did not call in, Chuck.

 

Just as well.

 

"PM" posted at Real Deal this cool statement

 

"Its not as if the cover up was rush job, after the fact, it was and had to have been, planned alongside the event itself. The layers of mystery are all but too much for researchers to unravel.

This is why I tell people, all you really need to know is that it wasn't arabs and jet fuel."

I listened to the show and recorded it on my iphone to listen to it again when I ride my bike for exercise.

 

I did not call in. I guess I did not wish to steal her temporary thunder.

George Noory seemed to say he did not support Judy's hypothesis.

 

I will be making a video on my powerpoint rebuttals of her 43 points after I complete theslides and finish my upcoming interviews with Jim Fetzer.

 

Only the gullible will be sucked in by her very weak verbal presentation.

No serious real scientist should be accepting her hypothesis as what really happened.

My exploding thermate that is in the expanding dust clouds has not even been studied in depth by any scientist other than myself. All of the anomolies are easily explained by mini neutron bombs and Thermate as chunks, globs and particles. The explosive nature is from the mini nukes, allowing the reactive and ongoing reacting Thermate to do its damage to the nearby building and cars, etc.

Other scientists, like Steven Jones have attrributed the anamolies to Thermate but have done nothing to explain how that damage was done from the photos that really tell the story if one can grasp my lead in hypothesis.

 

It may take a while for me to gain ground on Judy's hokey theory. She has been building up her following for about 5 or more years now and she has a PHD title that most people will lend credibility to what she has to say, since they mostly know no better. The MSM are probably liking all of this and heartily chuckleing at Judy's massive "misinformation" agenda, weather she knows on not that she is misinforming the public, who are mostly clueless and easily swayed.

Jeannon Kralj said:

Guess you did not call in, Chuck.

 

Just as well.

 

"PM" posted at Real Deal this cool statement

 

"Its not as if the cover up was rush job, after the fact, it was and had to have been, planned alongside the event itself. The layers of mystery are all but too much for researchers to unravel.

This is why I tell people, all you really need to know is that it wasn't arabs and jet fuel."

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service