9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Controversial Posting of Great Evidence for Utilization of Mini-Nukes Technology at WTC Complex on 911, posted by SPOOKED, not by Chuck Boldwyn

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Copied & Pasted by Chuck Boldwyn from below site...

Posted by SPOOKED at:   http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small...

 

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18) fission-nuke technology well-established
19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris

 

Most of these itemized points are feasable and do make sense, due to the evidence easily found after some serious investigations. Chuck Boldwyn does not agree with all of the above listed 35 points, but most of them appear to be supported by the known evidence...

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

15) what I see are multiple "ground zeros" from deep within the tower, down the length of the tower, initiated every second or so.  Those are the nukes and what is happening is physics 101 conservation of momentum:  the debris is hurled upward and outward symmetrically from each such that the final momentum of the ejecta equals a big fat zero, which is where it started before the explosion.  That ain't no DEW acting.

9) I would calc. per tower 3 X 10(10 power) joules to pulverize the concrete using Greenings fracture energy 6700 j/kg and divided this by 10 seconds to get 3000 megawatts of power to demolish one tower.  That ain't no DEW.  

5,6) not consistent with DEW.  If you microwave your potato, it doesn't have any nuclear fallout or residual unreacted chemicals in it.  

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service