TheHoleThatWasNotThere

Comment

Comment by Curtis Sherwood on June 23, 2009 at 12:52pm

typo "but if anyone nows of one"

only the shadow 'knows'.

Comment by Curtis Sherwood on June 23, 2009 at 12:51pm

Bill,

but of course. We don't need an expert. If we can produce a similar snapshot showing a hole, game over for this photo. I'll be on the lookout for such a photo but if anyone nows of one straight off, please add it or direct us to the URL.

Comment by Curtis Sherwood on June 23, 2009 at 8:46am

Bill,

I had honestly never seen the photo prior to last evening. My explanation for that is a long period of not keeping up with the 9/11 ho-hum for a long time after nearly burning out. That does have its advantages, though. I'll take your word for it that the photo has been photoshopped as I know photoshopping fairly well myself and I know how easily this can be done.

Should Killtown have the same treatment? I would say this photo, no matter where it shows up should receive the same treatment, no matter who posts it and no matter where.

So who exposed it as fake, and when? Do you know by chance?

Sorry for all the nurdish questions but as I said, I've been out of the loop for a long time. My most active time was from the day after all the way up to the big st split. From there on, I let it grow on its own. This photo is just a weed in the garden.

Comment by sandy rose on June 23, 2009 at 7:47am

yeh, bill, why do you appear to be constantly trying to piss
people off? did you bring home report cards as a child that
always said "doesn't play well with other children"?
i think that was you also on one of the late aletheia groups
mumbling about thinking nothing good could come of that group.
why do you do em then, and why are you always trying to antagonize
people? i don't see anyone else doing that here, just you, and i
quite frankly question your motives and don't get the feeling that
you are really one of us. you show one thing and then you contradict
it with something else, you say nice things to people and then you
turn around and say they smell!!! :(
i cannot beLIEVE what you said to Rosalee. and then did you go and
invite her as a friend like you did to me, after moderating me and blocking
my messages? and by the way, Rosalee's response to you was the
polite version. ! i don't think you have a clue who you're messin with.
could there be a chance that you are slightly split in the personality department?
some things are better to think to yourself than say out loud.
please state whether or not you think 9/11 was an inside job, wouldja? you
got pissed at Rosalee for not commenting on your small bomb theory, yet people
have asked you questions, like Jim asking you why you don't like it here,
i think i asked you a couple, with no response.
i for one see a cloud of insincerity hovering over your head. what up?

Comment by Curtis Sherwood on June 23, 2009 at 12:45am

Bill,

it's not my photo. I haven't even commented on it. Their's nothing fraudulous about this action / inaction. I was hoping to draw your and other's attention to the photo so YOU could enlighten us with what you may already now about this photo, which I believe I picked up off Ace Baker's site.

If the photo is a fraud, prove it. If it is not, I personally see it as a credible piece of evidence. I thought it fit well with "your" nose out photo.

Please be careful with the accusations, my friend. Methinks you are way too quick with the gun. Concentrate on the subject matter, not on the messangers. ;-)

Comment by Thoth II on June 22, 2009 at 3:01pm

This nose out photo is a dead giveaway that this cannot be a physically real situation. It looks to me like for this to be so, the nose of the plane would have had to passed through the steel core columns completely unscathed. Impossible.

And I seem to remember that phony Purdue simulation, which was just a computer simulation, showing the plane entering the tower and then shredding inside it. But this photo is inconsistent with what that simulation depicts.

How can it be inconsistent if they depict true situations?