Good on you, Jim. The "yousendit" link btw...
"THE FILE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS LINK HAS EXPIRED.."
I'm interested in the Spanish version and if any videi clip exists, that as well. Even short snapshots in Spanish would be great..to send out to Spani…
Which "flashes and explosions"?
Perhaps reflections?
The collapse was not faster than freefall as can be seen here.
For you to suggest they fell even faster than freefall, as if being "sucked down" is beyond comprehension.
Don't forget, I stand…
Oops, I had already noticed we both posted the same story as blogs the same day. A collision of information. No harm done at all, Jim. Watch how Sonnefeld (the Messanger) is attacked on various websites, blogs, foren etc. while the message, a real e…
If we can focus on the message, not the messanger.
Sonnefeld;
"When the North Tower fell, the US Customs House (Building 6) was crushed and totally incinerated. Much of the underground levels beneath it were also destroyed. But there were voids. A…
United Airlines Flight 175 - high precision contra wrong Rades data. Quoting a Pilot from Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum, "It took some ace piloting not to miss the rather narrow target completely." Wind played a role as well. If there were planes, the…
This shifts our attention back to the Pentagon. Many of us had already come to the conclusion that something other than a passenger airliner had been used. The interviews in this video serve to firm the conclusion. For me personally, the approach pa…
Thanks for the upload + embed, Bill. Much appreciated.
Why don't I simply accept there were no passenger Boeings (or Airbuses) at the WTC or elsewhere?
Well, that, I can accept. Thanks again.
curtis
Thanks. I hadn't figured out how to create "blogs", for example, out of inexperience. I was going to consult Michael, but he has cut me off. Let me know what other steps I can take to make this a highly interactive forum that advanced our understanding of 9/11. That, of course, should be our focus. So I will tend to discourage discussion of other topics when they are not relevant. But I'm willing to experiment. I have no hard and fast rules apart from mutual respect.
Sure. That's a good idea. All I expect is mutual respect and arguments that are as well reasoned as possible. I am perfectly will to tolerate disagreements, even strenuous ones, but I hope we have enough confidence in the power of reason that our positions, by and large, are supported by logic and evidence. I'll go to the "Manage" panel now and see what I can do. I certainly want to promote interaction and debate here, not curtail it. So, thanks!
Kurt Sonnenfeld: Yes, but not immediately. With so much chaos, it was difficult to think. It was only after digesting everything that the “alarm bells” went off.
Building Six was evacuated within twelve minutes after the first airplane struck the North Tower. The stre… Continue
embedding disabled or currently not possible. I still cannot believe this approach, tried the same thing on MS FS before 9/11, just for kicks, couldn't hit either tower on the first few tries. And I was a GOOD pilot !
In comparison to online anonymity by the means of masking or hiding the originating IP address of information packets, a true and real "signature", just how far can we retrace the true signature of the objects which apparently crashed into the WTC Towers, The Pentagon, or near Shanksville? What evidence do we have?
Web anonymity is scalable. Our true identity would be at the bottom of the scale, with 0 = the true and real sig… Continue