Danny White's Page

Hi Danny. I think I made it clear that the first part of "Collateral Lies" (called "Lies") was unashamedly a work of fiction in an attempt to introduce aspects of 9/11 to a wider audience. 14 years down the road the subject of whether or not 9/11 was a conspiracy has become tedious and I would not be the first author to use fiction to introduce fact. I fully appreciate your comment about video fakery not being the work of "a couple of drunk buffoons", which is why I have gone to lengths to explain to the reader what would be involved in planning from where to take the videos beforehand in order to composite footage on the day with simulations. As for the facts, what I state in the "story" regarding the chosen targets is undeniable and I have never seen it suggested previously. I'm sure veterans of the 9/11 conspiracy theory will realise immediately who the protagonist in the story is intended to portray and how I have woven video evidence post 9/11 into the sequence of events. If you manage to make it to the second part of the book (you don't have to read the parts in order), here I have attempted to collate information about the alleged attackers into a cohesive history of attacks against the US since their intervention in the Iraq/Kuwait conflict, which I experienced first hand. The third part of the book ("Statistics") is factual based on evidence. I don't dwell on theories about how the towers were brought down and only mention WTC 7 in passing because of Silverstein's alleged involvement. Indeed, I removed a large section of my work that discussed the use of Judy Wood's energy weapon, even though I had gone to lengths to try and prove how it could have been achieved with a Tesla ray from within, because I realised I was being drawn into the rabbit-hole of fringe conspiracies, which I really wanted to avoid. So, sorry, no nukes either. In my introduction I did apologise in advance to members of the forum who have heard it all before but in the true spirit of professional peer review I would urge you to read the entire work before making assumptions.

Thanks for the friend add, Danny!  We are getting somewhere!

hi Danny, ok on Gina, no worries there, was just saying hi.

glad to have Gina aboard and look forward to her thoughts, etc.

my, but we do have a mighty group of uhh...

.....................................   

     (not really a very pretty sight.)

      thanks, Danny, some of them i still have to look up!   carry on!  sandy