9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Khalezov is disinfo meant to discredit nuclear demolition

Khalezov is disinfo meant to discredit nuclear demolition


Views: 144


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on February 11, 2011 at 2:18pm
This week Kevin Barrett said that the nanothermite hypothesis is the most likely because it's the one established now in refereed science journals.  But Gordon Duff contradicted this by saying that these online journals are established by truthers themselves and aren't the final word.  I agree with Gordon.  And I'm sure whichever of our preferred H's eventually are proven to be the most established, it ain't going to be thermite.
Comment by Shallel Octavia on February 11, 2011 at 12:04pm

Dimitri's Nuke scenario is the only one remotely possible, though I think it is not correct. See my blog post on this: http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/review-of-dimiti-khalezo...

Mini nukes above ground would leave lots of blind New Yorkers and destroy the cameras of the Complicit media criminals. And, Memet please do shut up.

Comment by Thoth II on February 11, 2011 at 7:52am
I made a comment over at Chuck's photo on Dmitri, but I prefer not getting into that disinfo label, I just have trouble with Dmitri's physics. I myself think it is much more likely 10-15 mininukes were used than one big one.
Comment by Mehmet Inan on February 11, 2011 at 1:22am

Khalezof is really disinfo. And your title here is supporting him. So you are also supporting disinfo, again as usual.


© 2023   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service