What the hell is Judy Wood talking about?

[Ben Collet]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYDxCazAQTU&feature=youtube_gda...

 

I would be willing to bet anything that Judy Wood's accusation that Jim Fetzer "threatened" her - is FALSE.

 

Dr. Fetzer is one of the few people who took the unpopular stand of supporting her - because of her important research and because of his comittment to the truth - and this is how she treats him ??!!  

 

She correctly thanks Jesse Ventura for standing up for her - but is apparently completely oblivious of the fact that Jesse only even heard of her book thanks to his old friend Prof. Fetzer.

[Dennis Cimino]

Judy Woods can't find or show a single threat that Fetzer would have ever issued to her, under any circumstances, and if she keeps this crap up, she might as well bag it and step aside altogether, because the last fucker in this movement who's likely to low ball or threaten her is Jim Fetzer.  Now, the burden is on her to prove the allegation.  If she can't do that, she needs to apologize to Fetzer and state she mistakenly made that assertion but in fact there was nothing to substantiate it.  This does not bode too well for Judy if she is going to start attacking allies who welcomed her information and wanted to learn more about Directed Energy Weapons she believes could have been responsible for the NYC demolitions on Sept. 11, 2001.

[Thoth II]

See, I've commented on this forum for years, and I am really disgusted with the 911 truth leaders, with the exception of Jim Fetzer.  All the rest let ego dominate their opinions, not scientific method.  This also happened in JFK research.

 

I mean, it is bad enough that the perps did these country history altering events, but now we must suffer these big egos and consequent misinformation.  I don't know why the heck they don't get this simple point:  a man like Prof. Fetzer taught critical thinking, logic, scientific method for 35 years, why don't they understand he would be someone , who of course in conjunction with his team of specific experts, would have the best idea how to apply the scientific method.  I certainly understand that.  Maybe they need to go "back to school" and be well versed in these subjects, maybe that and their egos are the problem.