9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Proof for nukes is in the USGS dust samples showing elevated levels of various radionuclides including Strontium and

Barium. William Tahil did some of the early work on radionuclides in the dust, and came to the conclusion of underground

nuclear reactors in meltdown to explain the China Syndrome :  http://www.nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Report.pdf  ....  Dimitri Khalezov believes one large 150 kiloton bomb under each tower did the trick: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition  ....  Jeff Prager, Don Fox, Dr Fetzer, Chuck Boldwyn, and Ed Ward MD seem to be

leaning towards a top-down series of upward directed mini nukes:  www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/29/mini-neutron-bombs-a-major-piece-o...   ....  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-...  ....  http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm  ....   The Anonymous Physicist says it is fission due to the China Syndrome, and calls on us to get

together on solving this thing:  http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nu...  .... http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/35-reasons-micro-nukes-wer...  ....   I personally like the underground nuke idea to explain the disappearance of heavy basement and lower level steel, and the

craters of molten bedrock left behind.  There was first a rumbling ground shake, blast wave evidence going up the side of the tower, large fireball near top after 12 seconds, followed by top-down sequence.  I believe it was Jeff who mentioned

once something about reflected waves in demolitions of this type.  There was at least one floor of lead-acid storage batteries right about where the fireball and top-down started.  I agree with the Anonymous Physicist about getting this

thing solved.  I will add any new info to this blog as I find it.  This nuke thing is a key piece of the puzzle, and I know we

can figure it out. The nano people will come around sooner or later. It's in the dust.

Views: 367


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Danny White on May 26, 2013 at 1:59pm

I put Mr Tahil's article first since it included the actual USGS dust sample data I am discussing. I do not agree with his conclusion of clandestine reactors to explain the China Syndrome. I don't know where you've seen about

the lower-level steel mostly remaining. I have seen pictures of the angle-cut stubs sticking up from the ground tho. The rumbling ground shake 12 seconds before the top-down sequence can only be an underground nuke IMO. Fission fragments were left in the dust.  You make a good point about the Stairwell B survivors.  My first job after I ran away from home was working in a tractor-weight foundry.  Liquid steel is hot stuff for sure.  It takes a nuke to make it hot enough to vaporize instantly tho. I apologize for leaving out Dr Ward. I didn't realize he was so radical on the no plane thing.  Oh well.  The China Syndrome looks pretty likely IMO. 

Comment by Shallel Octavia on May 26, 2013 at 11:25am

Oh and AP's theory of China Syndrome is utterly ridiculous - 

Comment by Shallel Octavia on May 26, 2013 at 11:22am

Oh and you forgot Ed Ward...  (Perhaps he is best forgotten.) >> 


Quoting Ed Ward: 

"Fetzer’s recent discovery of nukes is 4 fold.  One, with Google’s assistance, Proven 9 11 nukes has been replaced with the ‘Mystery Solved’ BS.  Two, Dr Judy Wood and Dr Steven Jones are being seen as the disinformation artists they are and  Covert Operations needs a new ‘leader’ to push, Fetzer.  Three, just as they did for 9 11 ‘scholars, etc, if the operation becomes to well known – the poison pill is taken -  no planes – and the operation is broken up. 4. Actually having some real facts on something, helps Fetzer’s No Plane Disinformation."


Comment by Shallel Octavia on May 26, 2013 at 11:19am

Khalezov's Theory fails since the scant remaining steel was mostly from the lowest parts of the Towers, and we have the account of the Stairwell B survivors on the fifth floor. Tahil fails for the same reason. Don's theory states that "1/3 of the Towers completely vaporized".

There is no way the light from this vaporization would be obscured by dust. We are talking 60,000 tons of steel. Vaporized steel is hotter that liquid steel. This is liquid steel:


So this also fails.

© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service