Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
plane shot into nuclear power plant wall just atomizes.
Brick wall, steel wall, there must be some overlap.
An Aluminum plane can not go through steel & 6 acres of ~8 inches thick concrete floors and then when it is all the way inside and crushed 209 times its own weight, then suddenly erupt into a massive fireball.
The plane should have been crushed when hitting the steel wall and exploded outside the Towers, amen.
The 911 videos must all have been digitally faked....
Tags:
Comment
Did you saw the obstacle of the plane? It should be about 2m (80inches) thick massive concrete (obligation of steel reinforcement)! Compared to the twin towers, the external columns are 13inches ampty columns. The floor slab is 4 inches thick (Not 8 inches, as you say "6 acres of ~8 inches thick concrete floors").
Also, do you see any deceleration of this plane during the impact? There is NONE. The plane is disintegrated into small parts, but there is no visible deceleration. That means your deceleration argument about UA175 is NULL.
Some videos are probably fake, but all videos could never be fake. Also, using only videos for the investigation is a wrong method. You should also consider the damages, fixed pictures, calculations, ...
Welcome to
9/11 Scholars Forum
© 2024 Created by James H. Fetzer. Powered by
You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!
Join 9/11 Scholars Forum