9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

This video "from a DVD" by quantumflux432 shows us clearly the chicanery going on in the media.
This is the WNBC NY coverage of the second "plane". At 2:08 we see a definite object flying in from the top right, while at 5:03 a second play of the same tape reveals no object at all. Very revealing stuff!

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 stars.

Views: 140

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Shallel Octavia on September 9, 2010 at 10:32am
Hi Jeff - You are right, it seems the 5:03 replay doesn't go back far enough to see the object. Looking at this again, though, I found another questionable occurrence starting at 6:49 they have a caller "Janice Huff"
(who they are not sure if it's their "Janet Huff") who is watching them on TV, and saw the object, so at 7:30 they replay again, this time from earlier in the tape. They all then "see it", simultaneously. How is it possible that Janice sees this at the same time as the anchors when there is a broadcast delay of at least 7 up to 17 seconds?
Curious stuff! Thanks for your observations!
Comment by Jeff Focht on September 9, 2010 at 9:46am
I do not see the point made here. At the "2:08" time, an object can be seen coming down from the top right of the shot. It gets closer, and closer, and then is obscured from vision by the North tower. The camera then zooms in a bit, tilts to the right, and corrects, and then the second explosion.
At the "5:03" time, the camera starts to zoom in, tilts to the right, and corrects, and then the second explosion.
So you wouldn't see an object since it was already obscured from view.
That being said, based on the size of the hole in the North tower which we are to believe is the punch-out from the first plane, the object seen coming into the South tower should have looked to be considerably larger if it was a jumbo jet.
Comment by Elaine O'Grady Moore on January 20, 2010 at 2:08pm
Janet certainly has good vision to see the 'plane'. Amazing that she spotted it the first time. Of course, she's a member of the news staff, so she knows what to look for. Thanks for the revealing video. Always sad (yet somehow funny) to see how easily we were duped.
Comment by Shallel Octavia on January 16, 2010 at 3:53pm
Click on the YouTube logo on screen to view the HD version.

This is an awfully big oops if it is legit. Remember there was no plane visible in the
first copies we saw and the cameraman and reporters did not see a plane and were talking about an explosion.
The plane or "ball" as some call it was seen only later in the archived footage, but it looks like they forgot to draw it in on the replay. (!)

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service