Dialogue between conspirators

[bill smith]

I put together a kind of spoof dialogue between pairs of the conspirators on and around 9/11. In it I included various of my oown views on 9/11. I posted it on the jref and was surprised that so few of the debunkers there wanted to tackle it.

I will post the first 'episode' here and if anyone is interested they can have a look at the link to the jref for the rest..It Pages 1 and 2. Any constructive criticism is very welcome.

 

'Conspirator 1: There must be a hundred tons of that nanothermite paint stuff on those pallets of barrels. How are we supposed to plant that in the Trade Centres without being seen ?

Conspirator 2: We've developed a sweet little system especially for this, See these core columns coloured red on this plan ? Well we're poing to pump this stuff right INSIDE those selected hollow columns. Thev've all been sealed...no holes anymore. We may have to even fill them section by section right up as far as the 88th floor or so.

Conspirator 1: At night ?

Conspirator 2: Mostly I guess, but we could do it in the day too if we want, You just have to have those paint tanks on wheels full of the stuff. You wear overalls like maintenance guys and if anybody asks what uou're doing you just tell them it's to do with the fireproofing or painting or cleaning or something. It's only a matter of inserting a tube into a specially drilled hole and get pumping. Nobody will notice a thing.

Conspirator 1: How will they spark it off then.

Conspirator 2: programmable wireless detonators and redundant relays all over the place. No sweat.

Conspirator 1: Speak for yourself boss. Me and the boys will be the ones dragging those things around.

 

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=215696

[Jeannon Kralj]

 

 

Sweet!

 

What is so pathetic is that the only game in town to remember 9-11 this year is the thermite gang. 

[bill smith]

Hi Jeannon, Is there any key factor in your opinion that excludes nanothermite ?  If I'm onto a false trail I would prefer to know about it.

[Jeannon Kralj]

 

I guess I do not "exclude nanothermite" but I have read just about everything Dr. Fetzer and so many others over the years and they have given me reason to question Dr. Jones' whole, I guess, methodology or modus operandi.  In the early years of Dr. Jones' 9-11 involvment, I listened to and read just about everything of his.  From the very entrance onto the 9-11 truth stage, I had the feeling that there is something seriously not right about this person's 9-11 truth seeking.  Dr. Fetzer and Dr. Morgan Reynolds and a few others were early on the only voices from academia asking the right questions and closely examining Dr. Jones work so I found sound support for my inner uncomfortable "gut" feelings.

 

I realize now that Dr. Jones was, throughout, acting more as a salesman than a scientist.  He took advantage of people clamoring for and clinging to answers from a true accomplished scientist.

 

After reading the comments to Dr. Fetzer's Veterans Today article supplied by Clare in my thread here about the video, I see now that even the basic findings of Dr. Jones and Dr. Harrit in their famous study are now seriously in question by other scientists.

 

Sorry, for my longwindedness.

[bill smith]

Jeannon Kralj said:

 

I guess I do not "exclude nanothermite" but I have read just about everything Dr. Fetzer and so many others over the years and they have given me reason to question Dr. Jones' whole, I guess, methodology or modus operandi.  In the early years of Dr. Jones' 9-11 involvment, I listened to and read just about everything of his.  From the very entrance onto the 9-11 truth stage, I had the feeling that there is something seriously not right about this person's 9-11 truth seeking.  Dr. Fetzer and Dr. Morgan Reynolds and a few others were early on the only voices from academia asking the right questions and closely examining Dr. Jones work so I found sound support for my inner uncomfortable "gut" feelings.

 

I realize now that Dr. Jones was, throughout, acting more as a salesman than a scientist.  He took advantage of people clamoring for and clinging to answers from a true accomplished scientist.

 

After reading the comments to Dr. Fetzer's Veterans Today article supplied by Clare in my thread here about the video, I see now that even the basic findings of Dr. Jones and Dr. Harrit in their famous study are now seriously in question by other scientists.

 

Sorry, for my longwindedness.

[bill smith]

bill smith said:

Thanks Jeannon. In the 9/11 Truth world very few can be trusted. Somebody once said that ' the best way to destroy a Truth Movemnent is to LEAD it' which makes perfect sense. I know what you mean about Steven Jones. In fact I said something about it in post #677 on the attached jref page.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=145296&page=17

I am also very suspicious that so many high profile people said that they saw molten steel and then fell over themselves to deny it. Robertson, Loizeax etc. But I would like any ideas that anybody has that would  include molten steel or exclude it.

Cheers,bill

Jeannon Kralj said:

 

I guess I do not "exclude nanothermite" but I have read just about everything Dr. Fetzer and so many others over the years and they have given me reason to question Dr. Jones' whole, I guess, methodology or modus operandi.  In the early years of Dr. Jones' 9-11 involvment, I listened to and read just about everything of his.  From the very entrance onto the 9-11 truth stage, I had the feeling that there is something seriously not right about this person's 9-11 truth seeking.  Dr. Fetzer and Dr. Morgan Reynolds and a few others were early on the only voices from academia asking the right questions and closely examining Dr. Jones work so I found sound support for my inner uncomfortable "gut" feelings.

 

I realize now that Dr. Jones was, throughout, acting more as a salesman than a scientist.  He took advantage of people clamoring for and clinging to answers from a true accomplished scientist.

 

After reading the comments to Dr. Fetzer's Veterans Today article supplied by Clare in my thread here about the video, I see now that even the basic findings of Dr. Jones and Dr. Harrit in their famous study are now seriously in question by other scientists.

 

Sorry, for my longwindedness.