Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
Since this video by Dr. Sabrosky is very very popular right now, I thought I would look into it a bit.
Will quote Dr. Sabrosky -- "I had strong suspicions that something was very wrong"
Dr. S. continually uses the term "secondary explosions" as do all the phony news reporters in the YouTube video referenced below, all coincidentally parotting the same phrases "secondary explosions" "devices" etc...
Dr. Fetzer has already shown that the explosions were not "secondary."
by Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth)
The explosions in the basements happened 14 and 17 seconds BEFORE the alleged plane crashes happened and there is seismic data proof of these times, so these explosions were not "secondary" to anything.
Dr. Sabrosky's ideas seem very good and he seems definitely to be pointing the finger at Israel, the Mossad, PNAC, and neocons...
Dr. Sbarosky's narrative very very closely parallels the theme of Dr. Steven Jones and Richard Gage. Long years of delay not mentioning Building 7 at all and now Building 7 is the lynch pin solution to all.
Dr. S. mentions on one of his videos matter-of-factly that there is "proof" of "controlled demolitons" because of what was found in the dust, by Dr. Jones.
Dr. S. exclusively focuses on conventional "controlled demolition".
Dr. S. implies that if WTC7 was downed by conventional "controlled demolition", then so were WTC 1&2.
Dr. S. implies gravity collapse repeatedly.
Dr. S. implies the white vans with the Israelis around the towers on that day contained "explosives" and implies those "explosives" did the job.
Dr. S. is "an American of Jewish ancestry."
Dr. S. and Gordon Duff and other articles on VeteransToday seem to cite "ultra nationalism" as a unique form of "Zionism" that really has nothing to do with Judaism religion nor "Israeli nationals and nationalism."
Very mixed message - "It's the Jews but it's not the Jews."
Dr. Jones and company seem not at all in any way connected with anything 'Zionist." But that is deceptive too, because Dr. Jones is definitely "government issue" and he is a Mormon. Mormonism is joined at the hip with Israel and it is also more and more disclosed as an Illuminati controlled operation as far as this church/religion in Utah (see Paul Drockton at MoneyChangers.com)
Gordon Duff of VeteransToday has written many articles exposing Rupert Murdoch of late, but it is kind of strange exposure. Murdoch, you see, is an "ultra nationalist" so he is not really working primarily or specifically for Israel or Judaism. "It's the Jews but it's not the Jews."
We have exposed how Dr. Jones made many misleading, misrepresenting, and really outright deceptive assertions about his "thermite" findings. He played out these distractions and delays over several years and never mentioned Building 7. Now Gage has intercepted the ball and is running with Building 7 and hints of "controlled demolition", with "thermite" as the vague foundational background meme.
"I had strong suspicions that something was very wrong"
(c) And Alan Sabrosky, who earned his Ph.D. at the University of Michigan and is a graduate of the US Army War College, has explained that 9/11 was conceived by neo-cons in and out of the Department of Defense who wanted to advance the proposals of Project for the New American Century by taking advantage of the demise of the Soviet Union to expand the power of the sole remaining superpower by creating an empire around the world, but worried that Americans would not support those wars absent “a new Pearl Harbor”.
Now I cannot claim to know for certain that what we are being told by Lee Hamilton, Thomas Kean, Steve Pieczenik, and Alan Sabrosky is true. I can tell you that it is consistent with my own research and that of others with whom I have been in collaboration since founding Scholars for 9/11 Truth. "
This URL is the search results for any article by or referencing Dr. Sabrosky on VeteransToday.com site.
This article contains a video (that is on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J4o3Tbf5kg ) titled "9-11: As it happened on the ground"
"smaller secondary explosions"
"where the explosion was" "suspicious device" "a van that was parked in the building" explosive device planted
"explosive device somewhere else besides where the planes hit"
"A secondary device planted in the building"
Danny Jowenko was mentioned frequently by Dr. Alan Sabrosky in his recent popular videos regarding 9-11 and especially Building 7.
If I recall correctly, Mr. Jowenko did his interviews and videos originally about three years ago. He may have been contacted for more recent interviews as the linked article below has three embedded videos of interviews with him.
I just seems odd that Dr. Sabrosky is the one who seems to have revived our old memories of Danny Jowenko and now Mr. Jowenko is gone.
There was a thread on Killtown's old forum that listed all the names and people who were connected with exposing 9-11 who died early mysterious deaths. I would add this case as suspicioous.
One possible outcome or result or affect that this death will have is that it will reinforce or augment the case of those who want all focus to be on Building 7 at this time. So all those who referered to the comments and "testimony" of this conventional demolitions expert on demolishing large buildings are now taken to be right and believable. This a confirmation that building 7 was blown up with pre-planted explosives, with detonation wires and all of the usual components of a conventional controlled demolition operation.
I still say the current efforts of Architects and Enginneers for 9-11 truth and justice(Richard Gage of Jones and Company) for their "Toronto Hearings" and Gage appearing for interviews in more international settings and focusing on Building 7 and conventional controlled demolition is a strong "channeling" operation to direct the course of public debate about the entire field of 9-11 truth. Mr. Jowenko's untimely death seems connected to that operation in some horrifying way.
Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was killed a car accident Saturday in the Netherlands. He was reportedly driving from church when he collided head-on with a tree. There was also a dog in the car who survived. Jowenko is best known in the 9/11 truth community for his analysis of Building 7, which he concluded was a professionally-engineered controlled demolition.