9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

HOW INDEED CAN NANOTHERMITE BE EXPLOSIVE?
& THE NANOTHERMITE CHALLENGE


T Mark Hightower, B.S., M.S., Chemical Engineering

INTRODUCTION

This paper explores the explosiveness of nanothermite.

Steven E. Jones made the error early in his research, of classifying nanothermite as an explosive in the same category as the high explosive RDX, with no published science to back up his claim. The 911 truth movement has never recovered from this error, for to this day nearly everyone in the movement refers to "explosive nanothermite," as even this clever cover for a fictitious "For Dummies" book illustrates. (1)

Examples of Jones confusing these issues are cited and commented upon. Two technical papers on nanothermite are cited to support my contention that nanothermite is not anywhere near being an explosive in the sense of a high explosive like RDX. These two papers are also cited on the issue of adding organics to nanothermites to produce gas generating nano-thermites (GGNT) and I maintain that these papers suggest that the only way to make a nanothermite truly explosive is to combine it with an explosive or other high-explosive mechanism. “It's not the “nano” that makes it explosive. It's the explosive that makes it explosive.”

Finally, I make recommendations of what those who advocate the nanothermite theory for WTC destruction can do to clarify their position and I announce The Nanothermite Challenge.

EXAMPLES OF JONES CONFUSING THERMITE AND NANO-THERMITE WITH EXPLOSIVES

Here is a two-paragraph quote from Steven Jones' first paper. (2)

“Thus, molten metal was repeatedly observed and formally reported in the rubble piles of the WTC Towers and WTC 7, metal that looked like molten steel or perhaps iron. Scientific analysis would be needed to conclusively ascertain the composition of the molten metal in detail.”

“I maintain that these observations are consistent with the use of high-temperature cutter-charges such as thermite, HMX or RDX or some combination thereof, routinely used to melt/cut/demolish steel.” (2)

Here Jones puts thermite, HMX, and RDX in the same category. But thermite is totally different than HMX and RDX. Thermite is an incendiary. It gets very hot, it produces molten iron, it can melt steel, and it can catch things on fire, but it is absolutely not an explosive. It is not even a low explosive. On the other hand, HMX and RDX are high explosives. HMX detonates at 9,100 m/s (meters per second) and RDX detonates at 8,750 m/s. He also lumps all three under the category of cutter-charges, but a cutter-charge with thermite would be totally different than a cutter-charge with a high explosive. A thermite cutter-charge would cut by melting the steel with the high-temperature molten iron it produces (an extremely low velocity and slow process compared to high explosives), whereas an RDX cutter-charge would cut by the supersonic detonation of high explosives in what is known as a shaped charge, which essentially produces a supersonic projectile of molten metal (copper is often used in shaped charges) that instantly penetrates and severs the member.

Later in the paper Jones says

“"Superthermites" use tiny particles of aluminum known as "nanoaluminum" (<120 nanometers) in order to increase their reactivity. Explosive superthermites are formed by mixing nanoaluminum powder with fine metal oxide particles such as micron-scale iron oxide dust.” (2) And further down he says “Highly exothermic reactions other than jet-fuel or office-material fires, such as thermite reactions which produce white-hot molten metal as an end product, are clearly implied by the data. In addition, the use of explosives such as HMX or RDX should be considered. "Superthermites" are also explosive as must be remembered in any in-depth investigation which considers hypotheses suggested by the available data.” (2) From page 85 of a presentation that Jones gave early in his work (3), he says “Gel explosives: Tiny aluminum particles in iron oxide, in a sol-gel: “High energy density and extremely powerful” and “can be cast to shape”. http://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html (Livermore Nat’l Lab, 2000) I have read the LLNL web page that Jones cites above (4) very carefully and I cannot find anything in it that implies that the “thermitic nanocomposite energetic material” referred to is an explosive. It refers to the result as a thermite pyrotechnic, releasing an enormous amount of heat, but it does not say that it is an explosive. In the web page another class is explained briefly, energetic nanocrystalline composites. "The Livermore team synthesized nanocrystalline composites in a silica matrix with pores containing the high explosive RDX or PETN." No mention is made here of thermite, so this wouldn't apply to Jones claiming that nanothermite is an explosive.
WTC Devastation by public domain

COMPARING NANOTHERMITE REACTION VELOCITIES TO EXPLOSIVE VELOCITIES

The explanation given for claiming that nanothermite is an explosive goes something like this. The thermite reaction is

Fe2O3 + 2 Al ---> 2 Fe + Al2O3

By making the particle sizes of the reactants smaller, down to the nanosize (approximately 30 nm to 60 nm) and mixing them well, the reaction takes place so fast that it becomes explosive. Let's look at some data from technical papers where the reaction velocity of nanothermites were measured and compare these values with the reaction velocities of explosives to see if it seems reasonable to call nanothermite an explosive.

A paper by Spitzer et al. published in the Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids in 2010 presents a variety of research on energetic nano-materials. (5) In one section they deal with nano-thermites made with tungsten trioxide (WO3) and aluminum nano-particles. They experimented with different particle sizes, but they highlight the mixture made with the smallest nano-particles of both WO3 and Al for its impressive performance.

“WO3/Al nano-thermites, which contain only nano-particles, have an impressive reactivity. The fireball generated by the deflagration is so hot that a slamming due to overpressure is heard. The combustion rate can reach 7.3 m/s. This value is extremely high compared to classical energetic materials.” (5)

A paper by Clapsaddle et al. published by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 2005 also contains some reaction rate data for nanothermite composed of nano-particles of Fe2O3 and aluminum. (6) In Figure 2. in the paper the combustion velocity is plotted versus percent SiO2 content. The highest values were obtained at zero percent SiO2, so those are the only values I am going to cite. The nanothermite produced by a sol gel process had the highest velocity of 40.5 m/s, compared to the one produced by a simple mixing of the nano-particles with a combustion velocity of 8.8 m/s. (6)

Compare the above combustion velocities of nanothermite with the detonation velocities of high explosives HMX and RDX of 9,100 m/s and 8,750 m/s, respectively, and they are dwarfed by the velocities of the conventional high explosives. Steven Jones appears to be calling the nanothermite reaction explosive only in the sense that it is reacting much faster than regular thermite, but not in the sense that it is anywhere near as explosive as a conventional high explosive. By failing to make this distinction Jones has misled nearly the entire 911 truth movement into believing that nanothermite is a super explosive, possibly even more powerful than conventional high explosives.

From the above, it is quite clear that the “nano” in nanothermite does not make the thermite explosive anywhere near the degree of a high explosive like RDX.

In addition to saying that nano-izing thermite makes it explosive, I have heard Jones say that adding organics to nanothermite also makes it explosive. This issue is explored in the next section.

CAN ANYTHING BE DONE TO MAKE A NANOTHERMITE EXPLOSIVE?

First I would like to quote an entire two paragraph section, with its title, from the LLNL paper. (6)

“Gas generating Al-Fe2O3-SiO3/2-R (R = –(CH2)2(CF2)7CF3) nanocomposites. ”

“One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume-work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects. Typically, work can be done by a rapidly produced gas that is released during the energetic reaction. Towards this end, the silica phase of sol-gel prepared oxidizers, in addition to modifying the burning velocities, has also been used to incorporate organic functionality that will decompose and generate gas upon ignition of the energetic composite [3-4, 7]. Phenomenological burn observations of these materials indicate that the Al-Fe2O3-SiO3/2-R nanocomposites burn very rapidly and violently, essentially to completion, with the generation of significant amounts of gas. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the ignition of an energetic nanocomposite oxidizer mixed with 2 μm aluminum metal without (left) and with (middle) organic functionalization. The still image of the energetic nanocomposite without organic functionalization exhibits rapid ignition and emission of light and heat. The still image of the energetic nanocomposite with organic functionalization also exhibits these characteristics, but it also exhibits hot particle ejection due to the production of gas upon ignition. This reaction is very exothermic and results in the production of very high temperatures, intense light, and pressure from the generation of the gaseous byproducts resulting from the decomposition of the organic moieties.”

“These materials were also mixed with nanometer aluminum. Figure 5 (right) shows a still image of the ignition of the Al-Fe2O3-SiO3/2-R nanocomposite mixed with 40 nm aluminum. This composite is much more reactive than the same oxidizing phase mixed with 2 μm aluminum metal; the burning of the composite with 40 nm aluminum occurs much too quickly to be able to observe the hot particle ejection. This observation is a good example of the importance mixing and the size scale of the reactants can have on the physical properties of the final energetic composite material. When the degree of mixing is on the nanoscale, the material is observed to react much more quickly, presumably due to the increase in mass transport rates of the reactants, as discussed above.” (6)

Note that in the title of the section quoted above, the symbol R is used to represent the organic functionality added to the nanothermite. In this case it is a 10 carbon atom straight chain functional group fully saturated, with hydrogen atoms on the first two carbon atoms of the chain and fluorine atoms on all the rest. I have not explored the precise energy level of this functional group, but I can tell by just looking at it that it will consume energy (from the thermite reaction) in order to break it down into multiple smaller molecules in order to get the expanding gases necessary to make it behave as explained. This is not an efficient way to make an explosive. I wouldn't expect the explosiveness to be anywhere near that of a conventional high explosive, and the qualitative description given in the paper certainly does not seem to support it being a true explosive, but unfortunately the paper does not give data on what its reaction rate would be. Wouldn't it be better if the organic added to the nanothermite was a molecule that, instead of consuming energy to drive its decomposition, actually produces energy as it decomposes? Such a molecule could be the RDX molecule. This leads to the quoted two-paragraph section below from the Spitzer et al. paper. (5)

“3. Gas generating nano-thermites ”

“Thermites are energetic materials, which do not release gaseous species when they decompose. However, explosives can be blended in thermites to give them blasting properties. The idea developed at ISL is to solidify explosives in porous inorganic matrixes described previously. Gas generating nano-thermites (GGNT) are prepared by mixing Cr2O3/RDX and MnO2/RDX materials with aluminium nano-particles. The combustion mechanisms of these nano-thermites were investigated by DSC and high-speed video. In the case of Cr2O3-based GGNT, the decomposition of RDX induces the expansion and the fragmentation of the oxide matrix. The resulting Cr2O3 nano-particles, which are preheated by the combustion of the explosive, react violently with aluminium nano-particles. In the case of MnO2-based GGNT, the mechanism of combustion is somewhat different because the decomposition of RDX induces the melting of oxide particles. The droplets of molten MnO2 react with aluminium nano-particles.”

“The non-confined combustion of GGNT is rather slow (1-11 cm/s) in comparison with other nano-thermites presented here. However, in a confined environment their combustion rate is expected to be significantly higher. Indeed, the thermal decomposition of GGNT produces gaseous species, which contribute to increase the pressure and the combustion rate in accordance with the Vieille’s law. The thermal decomposition of miscellaneous GGNT compositions was studied in a closed vessel equipped with a pressure gauge. The GGNT were fired with a laser beam through a quartz window. The pressure signal was recorded along time for each material (Fig. 7). The pressure released by the combustion of a GGNT is directly linked to the RDX content of the nano-composite used to elaborate it. Depending on its formulation, a GGNT can provide a pressure ranging from a few bars to nearly three thousand bars.” (5)

I am surprised by the low number given for the reaction velocity, only 1-11 cm/s. Also, it does not say what percent RDX resulted in this low velocity. Maybe it was a very low content of RDX. But the main point I want to make about the above quoted section does not depend on this velocity anyway. The key point is that you have to blend explosives (like RDX) into nanothermite to make it an explosive (“give them blasting properties”).

WHAT NANOTHERMITE ADVOCATES NEED TO DO TO CLARIFY THEIR THEORY

Steven E. Jones and other nanothermite theory advocates should be upfront and truthful about these issues, and clearly elaborate upon the factors missing from their theory that need further fleshing out. It is not good enough to just say “explosive nanothermite” over and over again without explaining exactly what is meant by the term. If they think that incendiary thermite or incendiary nanothermite or low explosive nanothermite or high explosive nanothermite were used in cutter-charges, or some combination, then they should say so. The lack of or degree of explosiveness claimed, whether incendiary, low explosive, or high explosive, is key, because the type of cutter-charge used would depend on this. Once they clarify what they mean by their use of the term “nanothermite”, then they should start describing the quantities of thermite that would have been necessary for the destruction. Only by adding these details to their theory can it be fairly evaluated against alternative theories of the destruction of the buildings of the World Trade Center for the benefit of the wider 9/11 truth community.
___________________________________

THE NANOTHERMITE CHALLENGE

Find and document peer reviewed scientific research that demonstrates that a gas generating nanothermite (GGNT) based upon iron (III) oxide (Fe2O3) and aluminum (Al), where the gas generating chemical added to the nanothermite is not itself a high explosive, can be made to be a high explosive with at least a detonation velocity of 2000 m/s. The author of this paper will donate $100 for every 1000 m/s of detonation velocity that can be documented, the donation not to exceed $1,000. For example, if a detonation velocity of 5500 m/s can be documented, then the donation amount will be $550. Only one prize will be awarded in the form of a donation to AE911Truth, and it will be awarded based upon the highest detonation velocity that can be documented. Those submitting entries grant the author the right to publish their entries. Entries must be in the form of a brief (no longer than one page) write-up, with the peer reviewed research cited, and at least scanned copies (electronic pdf files) of the cover page(s) and pages relied upon of the technical papers, if not a submittal of the entire paper(s). Entries should be sent by email to DetonationVelocity@att.net by June 20, 2011. The award will be announced and paid by July 20, 2011.

1 May 2011

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: T. Mark Hightower began his awakening in January 2004 after having stumbled upon the Serendipity web site and learning that the explosive demolition theory for WTC destruction was a more probable explanation than was the official story.

http://www.serendipity.li/

He has worked as an engineer for nearly 30 years, initially in the chemical industry, then in the space program, and currently in the environmental field. He is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).

His research on 9/11 is an exercise of his Constitutional rights as a private citizen and in no way represents his employer or the professional societies of which he is a member.

REFERENCES

(1) Fictitious Book Cover, “Explosives in the WTC for Dummies”

(2) Jones, Steven E., “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?” Journal of 911 Studies, Volume 3, September 2006

(3) Jones, Steven E., “Answers to Objections and Questions,” Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, 18 July 2006

(4) LLNL Web page cited by Jones – “Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives,”

http://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html

(5) Denis Spitzer, Marc Comet, Christian Baras, Vincent Pichot, Nelly Piazzon, “Energetic nano-materials: Opportunities for enhanced performances,” Institut franco-allemand de recherches de Saint-Louis (ISL), UMR ISL/CNRS 3208, 5, rue du General Cassagnou, 68301 Saint-Louis, France,
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 71 (2010) 100–108

(6) B. J. Clapsaddle, L. Zhao, D. Prentice, M. L. Pantoya, A. E. Gash, J. H. Satcher Jr., K. J. Shea, R. L. Simpson, “Formulation and Performance of Novel Energetic Nanocomposites and Gas Generators Prepared by Sol-Gel Methods,” March 25, 2005, Presented at 36th Annual Conference of ICT, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 28, 2005 through July 1, 2005 UCRL-PROC-210871, LLNL This paper is free to download at
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?query_id=0&page=0...

Views: 3059

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You haven't haven't watched September Clues, have you?

 

Smart bombs were developed for the Persian Gulf war. I learned this history when I was hired to operate a French computer  graphics system for targetted advertising in sporting events for the 1998 NY Goodwill Games. This technology was morphed from Smart Bomb technology. A virtual target was drawn on a monitor on shot which would be aired. The interface with the computer generated the ad in the target that was drawn. PVI virtual media services which generates lines of scrimmage, downlines, and logos on football fields since 2004 evolved from that computer. This is also have the fake plane was broadcast and how smart bombs are directed. Smart bombs were used in the Persian Gulf war for the 1st time 1991. You can look it up yourself. Smart bombs only hit 50% of their targets. 

 

Jeannon Kralj said:

i have been reading and studying alternative ideas about 9-11 since 9-11-01 and this is the first I have read of this theory.

Here is a quick summary of some of the arguments that the Anonymous Physicist and the Finnish Military Expert are making on the Nuke hypothesis. I include the link to the lengthy article.

 

The two main advocates that mini-nuclear weapons were used at the WTC—fission or fissionless types—list several other giveaways:


• Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra-fine dust particles that moved upward, steel particles moved downward.
• Nearly 2,000 missing people, presumably vaporized.
• Missing debris from two-thirds of the Towers.
• Partially vaporized steel beams from WTC 7.
• 50-ton corner beams from WTC 1 and 2 flung upward and across streets to pierce neighboring buildings nearly 400 feet away.
• Short seismographic spikes trailing off, indicators of ground-level explosions.
• Elevated levels tritium, strontium, barium, and zinc residue, all elements of nuclear weapons.
• Pyroclastic flow amid the boiling smoke, indicative of the volcanic-like energy of nuclear explosions.
• Afterglow of explosions.
• Vaporization of 200,000-gallons of water in sprinkler tanks on Tower roofs.(44)

"

You haven't haven't watched September Clues, have you?"

 

I have seen that several times after it first came out.  I thought it was very good but as I recall I was impressed because it focused on the video fakery subject.

 

"Nearly 2,000 missing people, presumably vaporized.
"

 

This number has widely fluctuated with "nearly 2000" being on the low end.

 

We do not have much proof of exactly who the people were.  Their death records are odd, incomplete, and inconclusive.  Relatives of these "missing people" cannot be found or interviewed on the record. 

 

Fake victims is a subject that is now coming to fore in the Gabriela Giffords / Arizona mass shooting, but "Hoi Polloi" on Killtown's old forum, with the person who made September Clues video put out a pdf document about "VicSims" that put out some very interesting ideas regarding simulated victims versus actual victims.  The paper appeared to hypothesize that no one actual real person was killed in the towers and that seemed so extreme as to pretty much destroy an otherwise very interesting hypothesis.

 

(Actors and deliberately orchestrated beforehand dead-ends, rabbit trails, of many kinds are a definite part of 9-11 operation.)

 

Seems to me there ought to be some traces of human tissue and the "vaporized" theory does not work for me.

 

I have come to see that there will never be a "new independent investigation."  Even if that were a real possibility, I do not think that it would discover scientific proof of exactly how the WTC buildings were destroyed.

 

These days, I want to focus on

 

WHO DID IT.  (how they did it no longer concerns me at this point.)

 

It had to be an "inside job" so that narrows the WHO considerably.

 

Our federal government and all its agencies, most notably NIST,  and our presidents and our congress members and senators are basically operating as a criminal cabal.

911stealth Two Clips with what seems a Small Sphere "Hitting" the WTC2  

http://youtu.be/2TW9OqU6zR4

 

This Ball/Sphere is the incendiary device.

PLEASE NOTE THE SHOT OF THIS BALL/SPHERE IS ON A DIFFERENT ANGLE & HEIGHT:

 

Mysterious Ball Object Seen Flying Over WTC on 9/11 Part 1 - New Uncovered Footage kevin

http://youtu.be/ShbY0Oa-6v8

 

THE NEXT 2 VIDEOS EXPLAIN THAT HERZERKANI'S COMPUTER GRAPHICS GENERATED PLANE
COVERED THE BALL/SPHERE WHICH HIT THE TOWER.

Mysterious Ball Object Seen Flying Over WTC on 9/11 Part 2 - New Uncovered Footage

http://youtu.be/PiwBo7gz2C0


The plane of Herzarkani covered the ball/SPHERE directed at Tower 2, you must watch the video.
9/11 Ball Theory Exposes Mainstream Media - part 3

http://youtu.be/PiwBo7gz2C0

 

Richard D. Halls website richplanet.net.
The footage we have all seen on 9/11 have been edited to hide what really had happened on that. Live uncut footage has been obtained by 9/11 researchers which show a ball like object flying in with great speed flying along side the towers the same time the second plane hit.

Please note in the 3rd video, only 20% said they saw anything. All of those aired witnesses worked for TV networks or stations, were actors hired to play the parts or were just hired to play the part. 911 was a MEGA RITUAL. They were all plants, all hired to lie.

 

"9/11/2001: A Space Odyssey" explains WHY Occultists/witches/kabbalists planned & executed 911 01 Mega Ritual.

direct link
http://anonym.to/http://vids.rationalveracity.com/uploads/5uXbSNWMD...

This video is 2 hours. Press save when the prompt comes up, unless you don't have enough room on your computer.

Yes, I can enlarge them but there is limited space. I have the photos in Flickr. I have the video recorded in real player. If you can tell me how to convert it to put the video on Flickr, I will put the video on flickr. I did not get this video from youtube, I got it from another source, but it is on my desk top. I will repost the frames.

Dr. J. P. Hubert said:

I can barely see anything where you have it circled. Is it possible to enlarge it any further? 

Can you supply a link for the actual video?

Barbara Bush and Ann Cappelletti, 1/2 sisters, illegitimate witch daughters of Aleister Crowley (different mothers) got together in the 1970s to get the witch Bushes into the WH. Ann was a powerful sorceror/witch, having been raised in South Philadelphia Strega witch community, after being conceived in 1923 and born at Abbey of Thelema, Sicily.

 

You can google, Barbara Bush Aleister Crowley, and learn that she was conceived with sex magick (tantra) w Crowley as his sex assistant (Eroto Comatose Lucidity) for his stage acts. Pregnant she returned to US in Oct 1924, Barbara was born in Jun 1925. Ann's mother was one of many 20 yr old Sicilian girls (Crowley liked 20 yr old girls) lured to Thelema with money to have sex magick w Crowley to procreate the Antichrist. Crowley's book Moon Child tells of his desire to sire/procreate the Antichrist.

 

Barb & Ann got together in 1970s to set the ushering of the Antichrist into action. Learn what you can about Crowley, 666, the beast, baphomet, most evil man in the world, kicked out of Sicily and France for his black magic practices. Lashtal.com is a site dedicated to him.

 

I have been posting this since I first learned who in 2007: but I just got on this site a few months ago.

11 master occultists, satanists, kabbalists, masons & witches, were each assigned to his/her place on 911 01 by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London (who planned the entire ILLUSION of 911): Bush, Cheney, Tenet, George Bush's witch aunt, Ann Cappelletti, Bill Gates, Giuliani, Condi Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros and Saddam Hussein, not dead, 33 degree mason needed to pull off the satanic ritual of 911.

John & Michael Cappelletti's demolition company gutted and planted the explosives in WTC for the 911 implosion for Silverstein to collect $7.2 billion. Neocons and neoliberals are neopagans who have sold their souls and ours for money, success and power.

 

George Bush kicked off the 911 mega ritual in the FL classroom. He held a book of America upside down on his lap, kids chanted (their reading words) and red "The Pet Goat" to summon the demonic spirit of his grandfather Aleister Crowley. Then he went to a fundraiser of Warren Buffet at Offutt Air Force Base, nebraska. Look it up.

 

I have posted all my research on david Icke forums. I will give you the links if you want them. I have much, much more research. This all started in 1997 with the ritual killing of Diana & World Views art students moved into WTC 1 & 2 to live and work.

 

No people died the towers were gutted and prepped for demolition. Gelitin dropped dummies for the 911 B-roll.

Jeannon Kralj said:

WHO DID IT.  (how they did it no longer concerns me at this point.)

 

It had to be an "inside job" so that narrows the WHO considerably.

 

Our federal government and all its agencies, most notably NIST,  and our presidents and our congress members and senators are basically operating as a criminal cabal.



Have you ignored the HOLLOW TOWERS evidence? Jim Fetzer's program with Phil Jayhan & Larry McWilliams. The towers were gutted and prepped for demolition on 911 by Bush cousin's John & Mike Cappelletti's demolition company. Cappellettis have been involved in govt demolition jobs since the Murrah building, Minn/St Paul bridge, Deustche Bank fires, and probably the arsen fires in So. California.

 

Ann Cappelletti and Barbara Bush are illegitimate witch daughters of Aleister Crowley. They were chosen by the other occultists in the U.S. govt to head up the MEGA RITUAL, because Ann was a powerful witch, sorceror, was taught the CRAFT in Strega community of So. Philadelphia and learned BLACK magick for her Brooklyn witch before she died.

 

Witches burn money for demonic power. VAULTs under the WTC held hundreds of thousands of dollars. The tower were built the Rockefeller for the purpose of bringing them down. Towers were Jachin & Boaz the pillars of Jacob. Masonry is a copy of Jewish Qabala to the Nth degree.

 

Either you are feigning ignorance or you have lived under a rock for 10 years. Almost everyone knows about the Illuminati. Most people that I have ever met are aware and know people using witchcraft. You saw a PLANNED MEGA RITUAL on 911. 911 was a mega ritual by occultists, satanists, kabbalists, masons and witches. This was a plan for years.

,

What do you think Bob Kerrey was talking about when he said 911 was a 30 year conspiracy?

http://youtu.be/wDfm3NroVG8

911 Commissioner Bob Kerrey claims 911 was a 30 year conspiracy


Dr. J. P. Hubert said:

Nuke hypothesis.

OMG, I am SO SORRY, I didn't type Pauline Pierce's name. Pauline Pierce, 6th degree OTO, went to stay w friend Nell In Paris, who was living with Frank Harris, friend and supporter of Aleister Crowley IN 1923. Pauline wanted to hook up w Crowley to conceive the antichrist herself. She was Crowley's sex assistant. That is how she got pregnant with Barbara.

 

Ann was conceived at Abbey of Thelema by her 20 yr old Sicilian mother at Abbey of Thelema. Crowley was deported from Sicily by Mussolini at the end of 1923 and went to stay w Frank Harris, who supported him for some time. That is how Pauline hooked up with Crowley. Pauline used her relationship w Crowley as to obtain favors. Bush & Barbara's marriage was arranged. Prescott adopted George. That is why Obama has a pass, GHW Bush was not born in the U.S. but was adopted by Prescott.

 

I found this story 4 years ago, which lead me to the information that Ann Cappelletti, who I already knew was a witch, was Barbara Bush's 1/2 sister.

 

Look at pictures of John Cappelletti online and compare them to young photos of Crowley online, they are carbon copies. Michael Cappelletti whose pictures are not in the public domain, looks even more like Crowley than John. It is called GENETICS. Bushes & Cappellettis are demonic COUSINS.

The towers were gutted and prepped for demolition on 911 for the mega ritual to usher in the antichrist. Perpetual war and pilfering all the money from fraud, real estate, stock market, artwork and death hoax fraud was a PLUS for the perps. I suspect you are being paid to put forth this nuke theory.

 

Illuminati Card Game Card says "Terrorist Nukes" on the card with one of the Towers smoking and falling. I suspect you are being paid to push nukes, & you are sticking with that story, or at least trying to push nukes to cause more CHAOS.

 

Charles Manson's murder spree was called "Helter Skelter." I suspect we should just call 911 what it is ORDO AB CHAO," masonic MOTTO. Causing more chaos feeds the demons who bring demonic power to occultists & masons. That is what occultists, kabbalists, witches & masons do to get demonic power: cause chaos. In addition to ushering the Antichrist for the end of the world for LUCIFER, and NEW WORLD ORDER, war also sheds lots of blood and releases life energy from which the demons who deliver power to occultists feed. It is far more complicated that a few paragraphs. The plan is to choose one satanist to rule the world from Jerusalem, reduce the population to a manageble number of people, rebuild Solomon's Temple for Jews, masons & occultists, all part of the New World Order, where there are only Kings and slaves.

 

It is hard to describe 40 years of plans in a few paragraphs. 

 

2,870 death hoaxes at $2 million a piece is a lot of insurance fraud and fear of being tried for treason and executed.

Dr. J. P. Hubert said:

• Pyroclastic flow amid the boiling smoke, indicative of the volcanic-like energy of nuclear explosions.
• Afterglow of explosions.
• Vaporization of 200,000-gallons of water in sprinkler tanks on Tower roofs.(44)

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2019   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service