Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
This article I think is really entitled "Israel Did 9/11" with the subtitle "Israel Connection to 9/11"
The subtitle is most correct. "Israel Did 9/11" is not correct in terms of what a true forensic investigation would conclude.
This article contains all the evidence we have. It is strong. It is overwhelming. But I think this would all be called "circumstantial evidence." It does show that Zionist / Israeli interests are the entities that benefited from 9/11 and Zionist / Israeli interests certainly had the means, the motive, and the opportunity.
Another problem I personally perceive in all of this is the "Zionist / Israeli interests" term is really describing people and groups who are intent upon taking over the world, not just taking over greater Israel or "Zion." Their interests are not about the citizens of Israel, or people anywhere who describe themselves as "Jews", and they will kill those people without a second thought, as evidenced by Israeli false flag events in Argentina, Iraq in the early 1950s, the King David hotel event. and several other Israeli false flage terrorist events.
The exposure of something I call here "Zionist / Israeli interests" is the common denominator that one must take note of and expose. Many so called factions of the "9-11 truth movement" will only attribute the inside job nature of 9/11 to "the globalists" or our "shadow government" or "the banksters", etc. But when you follow the money and you name names of the people in this so- called "shadow government", intellectual honesty requires that the common thread throughout of the "Zionist / Israeli interests" is blatant, is the "elephant in the living room", and must be fully exposed. To simply not mention this common thread in referring to our "shadow government" is in my opinion a fom of lying. To tell that big lie undermines the entire objective truth seeking effort of any"researcher" or commentator who claims to be seeking 9/11 truth.
The link to the video at the beginning is dead but we have that video elsewhere on this forum.
There are problems with this good comprehensive article. It assume planes and hijackers boarding planes with weapons. It assumes "explosives" and it assumes the Twin Towers were destroyed in the same way, with the same "ordinance", as WTC Building 7. A common method of destruction for those three buildings is a belief held in common by Dr. Judy Wood, Dr. Steven Jones / Mr. Richard Gage, and Dr. Alan Sabrosky, though the method itself is not held to be the same. The term "explosives" in this article is a major underlying theme, however I do not think "explosives" is a word that apples to directed energy weapons or to nuclear weapons.
One thing I like about this article is that it does not place its major emphasis, or make up the most part of its proofs, as the Urban Moving Systems and vans scenarios. The only thing we have as any kind of substantive "proof" would be the FBI report of those vans. It is an approximate 450 page report obtainable via a FOIA request. There are portions of it posted on Squib. There are portions of it posted on the Lets Roll forum (found via search term "mural van"). The information in the FBI report does not support or coincide with the mainstream news stories of the 4 events on 9-11 involving Urban Moving Systems vans and trucks. Dan Rather announded that the George Washington Bridge van's occupants were taken into custody by the FBI. The FBI report does not substantiate that. The NY police department will not acknowledge anything about taking those people into custody and will release no records. The G.W. bridge van is reported on by many people as a van that intended to blow up the G.W. bridge. That is a leap that no objective commentator should make. You cannot objectively make that assertion.
My thinking is that the planners and perpetrators of 9-11 wanted 9-11 truth researchers to focus heavily on the Urban Moving Systems events and they inserted these events deliberately into the 9-11 script for their own reasons. I cannot fully elaborate on the reasons but from the limited research I have done, the proofs to substantiate all of these events cannot be found in documents obtainable from any police department or the FBI. There is a blatant "come catch us, we want you to catch us" quality to these events.
One other problem with this comprehensive compendium of "evidence" is that it identifies people and entities as "Mossad". It is rarely possible to positively identify CIA operations in foreign countries as definitely CIA and the same goes for Mossad operations in the USA. It would be better to say "is widely regarded to be a Mossad operation" or something like that.
I guess my overall feeling is that we should expose the Zionist / Israeli interests in regard to 9-11 as "connections" but not "proofs." To me, there are many indications that this whole area of inquiry was hard wired into the entire programming of the 9-11 event script. "They" want us to focus on this subject but forus on it in their way, a way that would most probably turn out to be an unoproductive dead end. They want us to be nonobjective and unscientific.