9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies

Ryan Wa shared a link on your Wall.

9/11. FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9 11 Commission Lies

9/11 FLIR Infrared Camera proves NIST and 9/11 Commission Lies
Tags: 2001 September 11 911 9/11 9-11 World Trade Center WTC WTC7

Views: 101


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on October 3, 2010 at 11:41am
I see a short excerpt in Jim's 3rd paper cited below that I think is extremely important:

" But hypothesis (h1), the govt. account....requires violations of laws of physics and engineering.....the liklihood of h1 is actually null......Thus , a scientific analysis of the alternatives on the basis of the available evidence demonstrates that the govt. account due to heat from fires cannot be sustained and that the alternative of a controlled demolition has been objectively established beyond a reasonable doubt".

This is profoundly important. It really establishes 911 truth on solid ground beyond any doubt, from a rigorous standpoint. Thus all the "CT" labels in the world, all the Hannity, all the "war on terror", all of it, are just outright lies, and will always be. The only thing left is for the world to do is take some serious study time to learn this, understand it, and then people can do something about it. If they rile on the lies and fuzzy thinking they won't get anywhere, but manipulated by the evil SOBs out there.
Comment by Thoth II on October 1, 2010 at 2:21pm
These are excellent articles giving foundations in logical fallacies and scientific reasoning. People should take the time to read and study these. I even listened to two hours of Jim's radio programming concerning these topics , and the hypothetical examples he gives are easy to understand and illustrative of the principles he is talking about. After this foundation, people can then apply that reasoning to today's world problems.
Comment by James H. Fetzer on October 1, 2010 at 2:07pm
Here are some resources for coping with this problem:

"Conspiracies and Conspiracism"

"Birds of a Feather: Subverting the Constitution at Harvard Law"

"Thinking about 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK"
Comment by Thoth II on October 1, 2010 at 2:01pm

This kind of thing is very encouraging . For instance, in JFK research, eventually "amateur" sleuthing by the likes of Mantik, et all, brought more and more specific expertise unto the extent evidence, and gave us a much clearly idea of what happened. Hopefully, 911 research will go down the same path, and stuff like this is the good stuff: more and more specific, solid forensic evidence that will give researchers a better clue into what happened.

I would say that both JFK and 911 truth are now on solid foundations beyond any doubt: the govt. commissions in both cases were clearly political cover up charades.

This is why this "CT" label is so disturbing. It is clearly a very clever and largely successful effort to obfuscate the clear truth on at least JFK and 911, by lumping them into the same tin-foil hatted category as , say, UFO research. Again, the gullible public is being fooled by this stuff.

© 2022   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service