9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

About the possibility of mini-nukes from Mark Hightower, a chemical engineer


Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:47:16 -0700 [01:47:16 PM CDT]
From: "T Mark Hightower" <tmhightower@prodigy.net>

Subject: My initial feedback on Anonymous Physicist books

To all,

I recently ordered both books from the anonymous physicist.


I completely read the 911 book within two days of receiving it. I am
almost done with the ultimate truth one.

I had never before exposed myself much to the micro nuke theory of WTC
destruction, but this person's book has influenced me to put this theory
at the top of my list as the most plausible.

His second book on ultimate truths is full of fascinating information,
even though I have a hard time grasping the alien part of it. He
mentions Zionism not as the ultimate source of evil, but just one branch
of it. This tends to go against my views because I have put such an
emphasis on ferreting out Zionism in my studies.

When I get a chance I will write up some of the key points from the 911
book and email them to you.

I was not disappointed in spending $100 for these two books and would
recommend them to other 911 truth researchers.

T Mark Hightower

Views: 333


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Danny White on July 12, 2011 at 12:28am

I stumbled across this information from the anonymous physicist, and tracked it back to this Aug 19,2010

blog between T Mark Hightower  and Dr Fetzer.  Mr Hightower has read both books by the anonymous physicist,

so I  hope he can shed some light on AP's ideas :    ....   http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/   ....   THANKS

Comment by James H. Fetzer on August 20, 2010 at 10:55am
Mark Hightower has just sent me this:

To all,

Here are Andrew Johnson's comments.

His website is


By the way he has a free e-book on 911 research. You can download the
pdf file of the book for free, or pay to order a hard copy through Lulu.

Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:36:25 +0100
From: "Andrew Johnson"
To: "'T Mark Hightower'"
Reply-To: ad.johnson@ntlworld.com
Subject: RE: brief review of book The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath
2.1 unnamed 6.32 KB

Hi there Mark,

Thanks for contacting me... Hope you are well.

Yes, your review makes the same observations I have. It is interesting that
"anonymous physicist" is taken seriously by some people - because he is
anonymous. He also claims steel "vaporised". As you know, the amount of heat
required for this to happen would've cooked everyone in the streets
surrounding the WTC - this did not happen. And, we can see in the video and
photo record that it did not happen - the steel turned to dust...

What he says about Steven E Jones is true - but again, we have another
connection to Los Alamos National Labs - in the form of Dr John Alexander -
who was associated with them when his team visited John Hutchison for 4
months in 1983 (i.e. they know about the field interference tech.)

Ed Ward and Bill Deagle are 2 other people who claim nukes destroyed the WTC
(but how this happen with no hear, no loud noises and no visible flashes of
brilliant light is glossed over)

Another "WTC nuker" came on the scene recently. Dimitri Khalezov contacted
me when he posted a 4-hour video. I analysed some of it and after asking him
questions, I discovered he could not explain the evidence. When I pressed
him on this, he essentially agreed that he could not explain some of the
evidence - then he later claimed he could (but he didn't seem to have added
anything to his work.)

You can read about the exchange I had with him.

What is interesting to me is that both thermite and nuke explanations for
the WTC have both got "traction" - in some cases, they reference data first
posted by Dr Judy Wood, yet she is regularly attacked for her own postings
about what caused the destruction (all this is explained and referenced in
my free book, which I already sent you the link to).

Anyway, here are the links:

Re-exploding the WTC Nuclear Demolition Myth - The Mysterious Dimitri

WTC Nuke theory - Self Contradiction - WTC is Melted and Turned to Dust at
the same time.

All the best

Comment by Thoth II on August 19, 2010 at 7:46pm

this is really what we need a lot more of, real physicists like this coming out of the woodwork to get into the technical issue. As I suspected , this physicist is scared to unmask himself yet,, but that day may come. I thought there would be a "change in the weather" with Obama, but that never happened and we're still living under this nightmare, which is undoubedtly slowing down the process of getting these scientific experts to speak out in mass.

© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service