9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

BREAKING: Toxic Texas City Terrified by BP Refinery Evacuation


BREAKING: Toxic Texas City Terrified by BP Refinery Evacuation

+ + + + + + +

By Captain Eric H. May
Intelligence Editor
The Lone Star Iconoclast

Note to my readers: The bullseye in the Texas Terror Triangle, BP's refinery in Texas City, has just gone red. Beneath the news story I leave my incomplete nuclear
national level exercise
analysis for Major Bill Fox, my former executive officer. Beneath that
is a special note of interest for Abu-Suleyman of Islamic Intelligence
and Dr. Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad. -- Captain May

+ + + + + + +

HOUSTON, 11/16/10 -- Deep in the heart of Texas City, BP's largest U.S. refinery suffered a fright last night after noxious fumes erupted from the dilapidated
facility at five o'clock in the afternoon to sicken workers and

Officials issued a nine o'clock "all clear" notice to end four hours of evacuation and shelter-in-place orders,

The still unexplained emergency, coming from the same place where a 3/23/05
explosion killed 15, is hardly a matter for comedy. The peril of
America's most dangerous petro-suburb warrants a serious headline, with a
serious article beneath it. Inexplicably, though, local media are
either not reporting it or are underreporting it with headlines like the
CBS News story: BP chemical leak spreads stink across Texas City,

The Fox News story was simply obscene: BP Plant Cuts the Cheese in Texas City, http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/weird/101115-bp-plant-cuts-the....

This is an outrage, by any standards of journalism.
When I wrote the editorials for Houston's NBC affiliate KPRC, Station
Manager Steve
Wasserman would have howled had the news director let that poor
headline pass. The story is of national interest, and should entice many
reporters to Texas City, like hungry sharks attacking a whale of a

At least a few Texas Citizens believe that their home town is already condemned for the sake of BP corporate interests. Among them
was "Izzi Ixxi", an unidentified BP insider who gave The Iconoclast
advance warning of the Dow pipeline explosion during terror training
exercises on 10/18/07, and of the El Dorado fertilizer company during
terror exercises on 7/30/09. Ixxi is adamant in asserting that federal
authorities, Homeland Security and the FBI, have played a role in
several Southeast Texas petrochemical explosions, including the 3/30/04
and 7/28/05, both of which resulted in record profits for Big Oil.

Ironically, BP paid a record fine for those two unreported and underreported
disasters just recently, reaching a settlement of
$15 dollars with federal authorities on 10/1/10. The landmark case
received little media attention. In Big Oil's back yard, all journalists
are BP journalists.

Portland media analyst Theresa Mitchell was clearly astonished while describing the 10/18/07 events, about which The
Iconoclast had sent warning hours before they occurred: It pays to monitor terror exercises, http://kboo.fm/node/4236.

"The warning of a sudden terror exercise in the refinery "national sacrifice area" in Texas came last night; the suspicious blast came early this
morning. It would appear that monitoring exercises like Vigilant Shield
and TOPOFF is essential to our survival."

I give details of Ixxi 7/30/09 warning in my summer exposé, Texas City Exposes BP Explosions,
His references to NASA are explained by my essay fragment below.

Captain May is the unnamed Army intelligence officer in the article Nuclear attack warning story dismissed,
published by The Daily News on 2/2/06: He served for five years as an
Opposing Forces (OPFOR) Controller in Houston's 75th Division. His Don't
laugh at duct tape; it saves lives, http://tinyurl.com/dcr2ed, was
published by the Houston Chronicle on 2/23/03, and evaluated Houston's
oil industry as a top terror target.

+ + + + + + +

... Essay Fragment ...

Ghost Troop Leads "New Kings Indian Defense" in Cyber-Coup Redux

Major William Fox

Dear Capt. May:
Another great article!
Short URL: http://tinyurl.com/284b3hw
DIGG URL: http://digg.com/news/politics/netanyahu_nuclear_false_flag_arabesqu...
Best regards,
Bill Fox

Reply, 11/15/10 -- Thank you, Major Fox! I think it's a good idea to have the America First Books website running the series of my November articles:

* 2010-11-01 Terror Targets Houston/Chicago, http://tinyurl.com/39h6e5v
* 2010-11-07 Sudden Nuke Exercise, http://tinyurl.com/23lch6o
* 2010-11-09 Biden/Bibi Nuke War Game, http://tinyurl.com/26332ra
* 2010-11-11 Netanyahu Nuclear False Flag, http://tinyurl.com/284b3hw

All of them link to AFB's Capt. Eric H. May Index, http://tinyurl.com/5f93lb, where readers can
evaluate our Ghost Troop false
flag analysis and actions. This latest counter-false-flag mission has
been splendid, even superb! It's certainly well documented in the
articles above, which are addressed to an official investigation from
the outset. You will recall that I made an incredible claim in the 11/1
Official Statement :

'As you will presently see, although I am not competent to move a finger or
utter a phrase, my articles and interviews, done through my eye-gaze
computer comands, still influence events. Sometimes my Ghost Troop is
merely in the loop, but at critical decision points, we ARE the loop..'

I would say that my previously incredible claim of capability has become
very credible indeed! The War Cabal is badly exposed by the
documentation of a very alarmed Internet, largely led by valiant
veterans. I'm quite impressed with this essay by Marine Corps veteran
Gordon Duff. He doesn't publish my work, but he sure concurs with it in
his Veterans Day editorial: IN MOTION: THE PLOT TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/11/gordon-duff-in-motion-the-p...:

"The second a disaster strikes inside America, the world will immediately assume the worst: Israel has deemed such an act necessary to push America to war. No rational person could assume otherwise."

Good work on this mission, Major Fox. You and Captain Jim Fetzer (IUSMC Vet.) charged right into cybercombat -- which is to say an obstruction
of an impending a false flag operation that is willing to kill if
necessary. SFC Buswell, Mr. Smith and I can attest that they are
murderous from experience. The XO led a poster party that doubled our
Inernet presence while the false flag wavered between going live and
signaling an aborted operation.

I take last Monday's missile launch and the proximate cruise ship explosion as abort signals. The
command post was in Kings Bay, Florida, and the first and last nuclear
events were Bay City, Texas (11/3) and Indian Point (11/7), 24 miles
away from New York City. So there you have it: Texas and Florida are
Bushman territories, and New York belongs to Zionist Zillionaires. Who
popped up in the media? Why, the Bushman
Brothers, Jeb, who is positioning
himself for a presidential bid; and George, who is promoting his
memoirs, Decision Points, published on 11/9/10. Yep, King George
commemorated 9/11/01 with a date code variation!

NASA was trying like crazy to heave SS Discovery into action to support the false flag
operation, the same way they did two days before the 7/28/05 BP refinery
explosion in Texas City, Texas. They launched Discovery as the first
mission on 7/26/05 after the Columbia crash 30 months earlier. The media
savaged NASA for blowing the (false flag) mission. In reply Discovery
opened up an apocalyptic demonstration across the nightmarish sky above
Texas City, which spurred me to broadcast a nuclear observer's report
(NBC-1). It contained cloud top height, cloud width, cloud direction and
cloud distance. In that case, as in this case, there was a concurrent
nuclear exercise.

As in the present case they used surprise by secretly starting in Fort Monroe, Virginia, under the
direction of TRADOC Commander General Kevin Byrnes. Byrnes was relieved
by Bush a week later, as rumors flew that an officers coup d'etat had
interdicted a nuclear attack. The rumors were true, but there was an
utter media blackout, combined with targeting of alternate media sites
covering the weird reports of apocalyptic skies in Southeast Texas and
cyclone hitting Charleston, South Carolina, where it coincided with the
evacuation of ongoing military command post exercises. Fortunately,
Lieutenant Lenny kept his cool and posted the interview from Canada,
through a German server. Upon such synchronicities the fortunes of
nations often depend: BP 7/28 Nuke Plan vs. U.S. Officers Coup,


"On the evening of July 28,
2005, the Southeast Texas sky erupts into a hurricane of fire, dozens
miles high and wide, over the blazing BP refinery in Texas City.
Captain May's voice reveals his fear of a BP nuclear attack. His earlier
national warnings of a Houston false flag have been validated. The
tension builds when a helicopter begins circling his position. At the
end of the interview, he calls for a military coup d'etat

Many thanks! -- CO

PS: Major, would you please check the four articles and replace dysfunctional links, especially those that are referenced by the AFB
edition of W. Leon Smith's recommendations.

+ + + + + + +

An Apology to Abu Salem sofyan & Islamic Intelligence

Dear Abu Salem sofyan,Moments after receiving your email (below) I received this from a member of Ghost Troop, Dr. Kevin Barrett, whose
counsel is invaluable:

Captain May: slamic Intelligence is Abu Suleyman, a friend of mine who, like me, isn't afraid or ashamed of
being Muslim. He's legit. It's natural that Muslims, the main victims
of the Zionist war on truth, would support your work. In fact, what's
surprising is that there aren't a lot more. Arabesque is another story.

I should have checked better before questioning your integrity. I am
sorry to have missed the mark so badly. I beg your pardon, and offer
your letter of complaint to my readers without editing or answering.
Perhaps at a better time we can have an exchange about your ideas.

Your contrite Captain May

"Abu Salem sofyan" <desertman23@yahoo.fr>
Peace be upon those who follow the right guidance

I was forwarded a link from the website rebelnews.org where your are
using my website to victimise yourself. I do not have any links
with Arabesque blog nor any link to any allegations made against you.
But it is not the first time that zionist jews or their puppet are
trying to make baseless accusations against me. I can understand that
after being attacked
you are trying to figure out who is behind, by googling my blog
probably appeared with one of your article re-published and with
confusion with arabesque you believed that this was one operation
directed against you, but I have nothing to do with it. I can also
understand that Israel will use my blog to destabilise you and accuses
you of 'disloyalty' to undermine you. This is possible, but I have
nothing to do with it, so remove your comment or back it with evidence I
am open to a free deabte on the internet to clarify things.

Branding yourself as intelligence specialist and speaking non sense won't help
you, I can understand that this is a mistake and accept in advance your
apologies if it is the case. Just remove your silly comment, that's non
sense if you read my blog !

But if you are one of these nuts from the racist extreme right racialist, ignorant that Arabs are only
10-15% of the Muslim World, and that
there are arab zionist jews that can trick you with only using fake
'Muslim website' or putting the word 'Arabesque' and their zionist
blogs. If behind these allegations there is something else, I don't know
you want probably please your israelis readers or racialists ones by
attacking me without any single evidence then I am ready to fight man
and demonstrate that you are a liar... As you'll see you were not the
only one to have understood that western zionist jews were behind the
terrorism and false flag of 9/11, you appeared on the net in 2004-05 (
may be later I am not sure).... where were you before. I forgot you were
'fighting' in the battle of the Baghdad airport ! Goodness me !

The next 911 is coming , it will be nuclear false flag operation, I agree
with you in some parts, it is designed to attack Iran and Pakistan, some
says in the US, I am saying it will be in Europe since Novemebrr 2008 !
I did not wait for your
articles or comments...

You americans like fight each other, speacilly some in the so called 9/11 truther movement. Playing
the game of your zionist masters. I am not playing these silly games, I
have nothing to do with you, nor any of those who are 'attacking you'.
Point barre !

Islamic-Intelligence blog

From Islamic-Intelligence: Back your allegations or apologise!

Views: 74


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by James H. Fetzer on November 25, 2010 at 4:49pm
No one is obligated to respond to anyone else. When you have something to say to which I have not already replied, I will consider making additional comments. But that is not the case at present. Thanks for asking.
Comment by Mehmet Inan on November 25, 2010 at 3:12pm
Thoth said : “you say any impact breaks the fuselage easily, but the force would definitely be enough to tear the fuselage apart with buckling compression forces and that would cause the back part of plane to be seen falling to earth.”

Did ever seen any crashed car? A car is more strongly designed to bore crashes than a plane. If a car is smashed by a crash, the plane would be destroyed into small parts, especially when consider the speed of the plane.

Thoth said : “ If the forces are weak as you say, the plane wouldn't look like a "butterplane" effortlessly sliding into the building.”

The plane is not entering effortlessly, the videos could not show any measurement of the forces. The actual speed of the planes is so big that the crash will break it into small pieces. All other consideration are lies, disinfo, or simply scientific incompetence.

Thoth said: “I still am not convinced of your point of view.”

Only God guides people and He decides whom He will guide. Ask God to guide you, may be you’ll be guided into the truth.

Also, you may use your scientific reasoning to chose your way. :)

Any way, Jim Fetzer is absent! Is he studying the facts, or is he escaping from the challenges? If he is studying, he is very slow for the study. If he is escaping, he needs too much more time, some more years may be?
Comment by Thoth II on November 22, 2010 at 8:18am
Mehmet, you say any impact breaks the fuselage easily, but the force would definitely be enough to tear the fuselage apart with buckling compression forces and that would cause the back part of plane to be seen falling to earth. If the forces are weak as you say, the plane wouldn't look like a "butterplane" effortlessly sliding into the building.

I still am not convinced of your point of view.
Comment by Mehmet Inan on November 21, 2010 at 6:57pm
Thoth said "I still think you are misstating the true compressive forces in the FUSELAGE itself."

You should study the fuselage construction; do not believe me, make the study yourself. I am waiting your study!

For me, the fuselage is made as light as possible; it is made to bore the air resistance force homogenously applied on the entire fuselage. Face to that, any impact breaks it easily. You can find some pictures about that, google image “boeing 747 accidents”. The fuselage could not create significant resistant force.

The strongest parts of the plane are the landing arms, the engines, the wings between the engines. These parts act on the deceleration during landing. Their strongest force makes the plane decelerate during tens of seconds.

The NPT is definitely false.
Comment by Thoth II on November 21, 2010 at 3:38pm

I still think you are misstating the true compressive forces in the FUSELAGE itself. Those would be quite substantial and would cause the plane to buckle, tear apart, decelerate, and the back 20 rows would be seen on the video falling down to the sidewalk
Comment by Mehmet Inan on November 19, 2010 at 4:13pm
Thoth said: "but I think you are dead wrong about "F is limited" meaning a small enough force for your argument about a small "a" to be valid".

That's an argument. I explained it in an earlier message, but it seams not understood.

Let's consider the available force: Do you imagine what force is created to decelerate a plane during landing? All engines are in reversed force mode and all brakes are switched on. With all that it's requires tens of second to decelerate it.

What's the available force during impact? It's the force that the parts of the plane can bore. When the nose of the plane touches the tower, what happens? The nose is broken; the available force is the force needed to break the nose. What’s that force? Extremely small, it’s smaller than the available force during landing. So the possible deceleration is smaller than landing deceleration.

It’s clear that during the nose entry the available force for deceleration is too much smaller than the landing deceleration force and so there will be no deceleration during the nose entry.

When the wings begin to hit the tower, the available force becomes bigger, but it only acts for deceleration of the wings themselves; the tail part is also retained by some small parts of the fuselage and could not bore big forces.

In practice, only the wings could decelerate some, all remaining parts will not decelerate. That will decelerate the wing tips, but the time difference is so small that we can not see any difference. The only difference is the smaller damage made by the wing tips. And that’s clearly visible. The outer columns are not broken on the wing tips; only aluminum cover plates are damaged.
Comment by Thoth II on November 19, 2010 at 12:44pm

Mehmet, I certainly agree with your overall philosophy, but I think you are dead wrong about "F is limited" meaning a small enough force for your argument about a small "a" to be valid. That is where you are making your mistake, but to settle this issue definitely, we'd need an elaborate computer simulation, and not a one where they cheated like that Purdue simulation they did.
Comment by Mehmet Inan on November 18, 2010 at 4:54pm
Thoth, the NPH is totally false for me, and I proved it. The calculations F=m*a --> a=F/m=dv/dt --> dv= F*dt/m, F is limited by the plane parts and some clumns, dt is very small 0.25s, m is big (whole weight of the plane). That makes dv (variation of speed) extremely small, and the time difference between the speed in the air and in the entrance should be the same.

That's mathematics, physics law. That definetly proves NPH or NPT is NULL. I do not need more, it's so simple.

Do not tell me your opinions, I need evidence, mathematics, physics law, ...

I do not accept wrong theories told by scholars in the name of scholars for 9/11 truth. That's unacceptable. And as leader, Jim has the obligation the state the final position which should be the truth. He can not escape the discussion.
Comment by Thoth II on November 17, 2010 at 8:33pm
Mehmet, I do not agree that Jim has been silent about the NPT. He has offered extensive written and real deal radio commentary on this subject, and also featured many guests such as webfairy, killtown, and ace.

I believe the evidence for NPT (really NPH for H hypothesis) is very strong now, and I totally am behind the NPT.
Comment by Mehmet Inan on November 17, 2010 at 6:07pm

Up to now, all your arguments about the "No Plane Theory" are debunked, you remain silent while I am waiting a clear statement from you declaring that NPT was an error and it should be removed from scholars theory list. Or you can bring other arguments, but you can not remain silent about that issue.


© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service