Can the 9/11 Truth Community Handle the Truth?

[Dean]

http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2010/06/can-the-911-truth-com...

I wrote an article called Understanding 9/11: Follow the Planes and Passengers recently in which I used Bureau of Transportation Statistics records and other facts about 9/11. I determined that plotters merged the four flights into two and tricked air controllers into believing the two flights left behind actually flew that day.

Some feedback has been positive. The rest of it has been unresponsive (some have called it a "no plane" theory even though I identify the planes used by flight number)

Which is a shame. We need a good debate within the 9/11 Truth community as to what really happened. There are disagreements about some of the details, which is hardly unexpected, but the best way to work out disagreements is to talk them (or email them) out.

I challenge those serious about finding the truth to articulate why they believe the way they do.

Reasonable minds can differ, for instance, as to what hit the World Trade Center. But it is not reasonable to make presumptions or to preempt another's ideas with name-calling. This behavior causes rifts that are costly and hard to mend.

So I challenge the truth community further to identify the issues about 9/11 that are most important to determine the truth about.

If we all are in consensus (not necessarily full agreement) as to what we need to show to a public asleep on this issue after nine years of lies from our leaders, we will be better able to work together. I grew up playing baseball and my analogy is that if the team of 9/11 Truth
needs you to play right field, go play it.

After all, the "jersey" that we wear does not show "no planes" or "missile at the Pentagon" on it. It shows the word truth. And when the truth stares at us on a one-way street, it is time for a new direction!

[sandy rose]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

was looking thru all of my old old stuff on 9/11, for passenger
info, came across this and thought i'd pass it on. sposeda be
about 9/11 witnesses and their 'mysterious' deaths. .....

[sandy rose]

yeah, i hear ya. getting no response unfortunately is the norm.
i don't know how to make it happen either. no doubt the heartless
criminals had this very thing in mind.
it might seem like a good idea on a group, to get input from each
member. i was gonna come here and delete what i said tho, because
much as other peoples' feedback might help, most people just sit
there with it zipped. they leave it up to the other guy. not helping.

it's no wonder that some of us feel like giving up. it's distressing.
it's like battling a plague of deadly biting insects with a fly swatter. sheesh.

[Dean]

Thank you, Sandy!!!

No one has yet taken on what I have said in my essay. Critics keep identifying my ideas as "no plane" and then they dismiss the idea.

I have told people who focus on other aspects of the 9/11 crimes that we can work together and specialize on specific issues at the same time. I am getting no response. I would like to have 9/11 Truth unity but do not know how to make that happen.

I want to learn more about the passengers - were all of them real people? were some of them fake names? can we prove any are still alive?

Sandy - you had a good idea - we should simply go around from one member to another as to what direction to take. Who wants to learn more about the passengers?