Fake attack on David Ray Griffin's studies of the fake phone calls . . .

[James H. Fetzer]

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-02-10/critique-david-ray-griffin-s-...

 

More proof that 911blogger has gone over to the dark side. Even the FBI admitted that the alleged phone calls from Barbara Olson to her husband, Ted, had not occurred, even though Ted, our former Solicitor General, had claimed she called him twice and gave three different versions of how it happened, since cell phones don't work at that speed and altitude and Boeing 757s were not equipped with air phones.  If the Solicitor General, who represents the administration before the Supreme Court, will lie about 9/11, we know that no one associated with the government can be trusted.  Nor can 911Blogger.com, alas!

 

"CRITIQUE OF DAVID RAY GRIFFIN'S 9/11 FAKE CALLS THEORY" by Eric Larson

Submitted by loose nuke on Thu, 02/10/2011 - 9:55pm

 

Beginning with his book New Pearl Harbor  (2004) David Ray Griffin  raised questions concerning the veracity of reports of phone calls from the 9/11 hijacked airliners, specifically, Ted Olson’s account. Since at least 2006, he has promoted a theory that the 9/11 plane passenger phone calls were faked, and has speculated this was done with ‘voice-morphing’ technology. He’s done this in many different articles, in books, in speaking appearances, in interviews on radio and television, and in a debate with Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone magazine. In his 1/12/10 essay, Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners: Response to Questions Evoked b..., David Ray Griffin gives the most comprehensive overview of this theory to date, as well as a response to critics, which include people who support a new 9/11 investigation. A Professor Emeritus and skilled rhetorician, Griffin makes a case that is seemingly compelling. However, as I show in this essay, there is no actual evidence the phone calls were faked, while there is a substantial body of evidence demonstrating the calls were not only possible, but did happen. There are many credible reasons to doubt the official 9/11 story and support a full investigation, but the cause of compelling a new 9/11 investigation is undermined by the promotion of theories that are flawed, and not based on hard evidence. In addition, the claim that the phone calls were faked is obviously offensive to those family members who spoke with passengers before ..., and it has the potential to drive a wedge between truth and justice activists and potential allies among the family members, many of whom support a full investigation.

 

[jane doe]

MORE

BEFORE I forget, have you ever heard of ORDO AB CHAO? It is what is on every masonic document. It means "Order out of Chaos." All the different stories for 911 were planned for Ordo Ab Chao, a RITUAL. Charles Mason's death ritual was Helter Skelter. Bush Cheney et al's ritual was Ordo Ab Chao.

 

Lots of people were hired to lie and gather in downtown to chant during the rituals on 911. Many, many people were paid to lie. No one told the same story, or haven't you listened to all the different stories that were told. Notice that none of the people who were supposed to be in the buildings had soot on his/her face as they did in 1993. Their hair was even well-coiffed. So many liars hired to be in downtown Manhattan on 911 to tell the official story.

 

My spiritualist told me this: groups of witches gathered in downtown Manhattan to chant for demonic power as the ritual implosions went on. A particular witch stood near the towers doing a ritual standing in burning coals between 2 mason bodybuilders. [You do know bodybuilders are masons.] I won't tell you who. I am sure you know her.

 

The people who said they saw a plane all had different stories to tell. If you haven't seen September Clues, then you would not be aware of all the paid actors and different stories. I don't believe anyone saw a plane, I believe they were all paid to lie. If there were a plane, no doubt it was a hologram. I found lots of augmented reality video which I will post for you. My research is on davidicke forum under main forums, 9/11. I post there by the name 07August.

 

There is a site at which all the different planes and different directions are drawn together. I posted it on davidicke, I will try to find it and send it to you. All the plane composites ARE DIFFERENT: different directions, different colors, different shapes. Have you never noticed this?

[jane doe]

MORE

Like a chromakey, the image will be only be generated when the color picked is present. Shades (for shadows) of the color can be added with + or limited with -. Green grass, or as on 911 BLUE SKY, are the only colors on which the line, logo or animation will be generated. (When the animated plane met with the different color of the building-grey, it no longer appeared until it passed onto the BLUE SKY color on the other side of the building.)

 

It works the same as a chromakey but on a smaller scale. Anyone standing in front of the chromakey with the same color in his tie will have the video bleed through that color. A football jersey w the same color will bleed and the generated image would bleed through as well.

 

During the game when the ball is stopped, the yardline is yelled out by the production assistant. The operator keys the number into the keypad. At that specific spot a path is generated on the wireframe, the line (it actually is a small dot/square which is stretched into a line by the computer) is stretched across the line generated between the sidelines. There are 2 lines to be generated, the yardline and the line of scrimmage where the logo w 1st & 10 is wiped or dissolved into the program video. The technical director inserts PVI over the program with a mix or a wipe effect.

 

The 911 camera moved from where it was originally mapped--this is all done beforehand (which indicates preplanning). Remember the camera is in the helicopter. The pilot kept the same spot or so he thought, but it was a bit off--which put the end parameter of the wireframe past the edge of the building--now blue sky. The plane icon finds blue and is visible until it reaches the end of its path.

 

Lots of people were paid to lie on 911. Many, many people were paid to lie. No one told the same story, or haven't you listened to all the different stories that were told. Notice that none of the peopl

[jane doe]

When I send a link to someone I usually check it to make sure it is working. The last time I put PVI in my google box, it took me to Sportvision. In December I found 2 posts that said PVI had sold the business to ESPN2 and Sportvision.

The downlines on football games and the 1st & 10 logo is generated by the PVI LVIS computer. The technical director mixes the signal upstream from the LVIS/PVI monitor with the program video at the switcher.

 

Here is how it works:

PVI operator has two monitors, one for the live feed, one for the PVI graphic mixed with the live feed, and a LVIS (linear virtual imaging systerm) computer. After the software is loaded on the PC, a camera shot of the field appears in the monitor. The operator grabs the 1st freeze of the camera shot. The software then goes to the part of the program that represents the 100 yd field. [the field map is a 100 yd green rectangle/cartoonlike. Never at the same time will the camera see more than 1/3 of the field.]

 

Lets say, camera left shot is grapped first. The operator picks 2 horizontal lines to represent the sidelines and 3 vertical lines to represent the yardlines. [For a football game, 3 camera shots are mapped: Camera left, Camera center, Camera right.] 3 yardlines & 2 sidelines/or 1 sideline & 1 hashmarks are needed to be plotted to create the virtual wireframe.

Lines are plotted by points chosen on the actual grabbed shot. Lines are plotted on the camera shot of the field by selecting 2 points for a horizontal line, 2 lines are made for the sidelines. Next, 2 points picked for each yardline. 3 vertical lines are selected. After 5 lines are chosen (2 horizontal & 3 vertical), make wireframe is clicked and within seconds the virtual wireframe appears. 

 

 A color of the field is chosen with the color picker. Same way it is done in photoshop or adobe illustrator. Like a chromakey, the image will be only b

[jane doe]

"insert computer-generated images into live or pre-recorded video broadcasts of events"

This is the key to how the perps on 911 inserted the graphic into the LIVE BROADCAST.

It works the same way a chromakey works but it is LINEAR, on a path or LINE.

 

I will explain more to you in my next post. Thanks for looking into it. My Internet address box still is not appearing. I can only get to links that I have in my emails in my inbox.

 

More to come.

[James H. Fetzer]

Tell me more, Jane Doe.  How was it done again?  This sounds extremely interesting to me.  You are talking about a form of video compositing, are you not?  where images can be inserted into broadcasts?  but how does that account for those who claimed to have seen a plane hit the building?  Tell me more about all of this.

[James H. Fetzer]

COMPANY OVERVIEW

PVI Virtual Media Services LLC designs and develops vision-based virtual image entertainment technology for television. The company’s InVU virtual placement technology allows broadcast, cable, and broadband networks to insert computer-generated images into live or pre-recorded video broadcasts of events, sports contests, and other television programming. Its products include GameVU to insert a line of scrimmage, a player's path, or animated or branded images onto the field; PlayerVU, a data-gathering system to capture and record the position, direction, and speed of moving objects in sporting events; and BrandVU for virtual product placement. The company was founded in 1990 and is based in Lawrenceville, New Jersey. PVI Virtual Media Services LLC operates as a subsidiary of ESPN, Inc.

Hide Detailed Description

15 Princess Road

Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2301

United States

Founded in 1990

Phone:

609-912-9400

 

Fax:

609-912-0044

 

KEY EXECUTIVES

Mr. Jay DiGiovanni

Senior Vice President and General Manager

[jane doe]

Please Jim, look into PVI. PVI sold the company in December 2010 to Sportvision and ESPN2. IT WAS A PVI VIRTUAL ANIMATION. Even the guys from letsrollforums agree with me NOW.

If you know someone who has a tv production truck, maybe they can show it to you. The operator plots a 3D wireframe on a camera shot. A point is picked from which the animation is executed. You will notice if you watch the helicopter footage, that the camera zooms in 2 times. The director was checking the animation in the preview monitor, before the plane animation was taken on the program monitor. The wireframe was a big off, and was not reset, that is why the plane icon went past the predetermined border. The camera shot MOVED. There were NO PLANES. It was an elaborate ILLUSION.

Don Dahler reported for ABC saying he didn't see a plane. Charles Gibson told him WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO SEE.

 

Have you watched September Clues? There is plenty of video with no plane animation recorded on 911 to prove what you saw was a GRAPHIC, NO PLANE. Forbes is a paid UK plant. Too many adds to his story.

 

[jane doe]

If people are still finding body parts in Manhattan in 2011 this is way out there. Since there were only vicsims the only body parts were planted. He played his own violin. There were so many stories composed on 911. Now, we know Edna Cintron was fake and there was no hole the second tower. I have lots of photos which show there was no hole in that building.

 

I hope that you look at the pictures Richard Segal took at Ground Zero. I was led there from the stevenwarran blogspot. It took me a few tries to get to the pictures, I will send them along when I can  google. btw, I sent Phil Jayhan this information via email after I asked him if he wanted the information that I found on Art Insurance fraud. You will see a totally different ground zero that existed than the one photoshopped for the public. I still can't google.

 

[James H. Fetzer]

My best guess is that we were watching a hologram, which can fly faster than is possible with a real 767, can enter buildings in a fashion impossible for a real 767, can pass through its own length into the building in the same number of frames it passes through its own length in air, and can fly without strobe lights on the top and bottom of its fuselage and on its wing tips.  That's an article, not a YouTube.  Let me know what you think.  He (Scott Forbes) came across as quite serious and sincere to me, where his observation that the building simply "swallowed the plane" was consistent with a hologram, but not with a real plane.  I thought was was a "plus"!

[jane doe]

I am still listening to the end of your radio show. The more he talked the more FOS he became.

 

To me I thought it looked like a cascade fountain of dust & sand.

The TALL SHIPS is what he is talking about. Tall Ships come every July 4 into the harbor. It happens every year. I will find the date of that year.

The planes were not flying 500 mph. That is what stunt pilots do in airshows, not commercial jets.
Sounds FOS to me, but I will research it. This guy is a plant. I will also list the other videos when I reply. Now, I will watch "New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11." I joined your forum to see if there was something that I missed.

 

I also have the list of who was on what floor. I don't thing there was anyone above 92 because Gelitin said there were no offices above them. This guy is a liar.