9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

From Government Officials, 9/11 Commission Members, and Intelligence Experts . . .

For more, visit http://patriotsquestion911.com.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

The Anniversary of 9/11



9/11 Commissioners:

  • And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - recently said "At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the
    truth about what happened
    ". He also
    said "I was
    shocked at how different the truth was from
    the way it was described
    .... The tapes told a radically different
    story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is
    not spin. This is not true." And he
    said: "It's
    almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were
    interviews made at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes
    were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was
    distorted and was completely different from the way things happened
    "
If even the 9/11 Commissioners don't buy the official story, why do you?

Senior intelligence officers:
  • Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far
    more explosive than the Pentagon Papers
    ". He also said that the
    government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And
    he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are
    credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S.
    government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might
    have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically
    beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there's enough
    evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with
    subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see
    this and
    this)
  • A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement
    agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their
    concerns about
    http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/hsp-911commission-040913.pdf" target="_blank" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060615005757/http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/hsp-911commission-040913.pdf">“serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the
    9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation
    (they were ignored)

  • A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding
    career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana
    (Robert Baer) said that
    "the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an
    inside job

If even our country's top intelligence officers don't buy the official story, why do
you?

Congressmen:

  • Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has
    shown that the
    U.S. tracked hijackers before
    9/11
    , is open to hearing
    information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the
    possibility that
    9/11 was an inside
    job
If there is bipartisan questioning of the official story, why aren't you questioning
it?

Other government officials:
  • Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US
    Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well
    as a who's who of liberals and independents) jointly
    call for a new investigation into
    9/11
  • Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a
    widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John
    Loftus)
    says "The
    information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so
    extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a
    defense of incompetence"
If top government officials are skeptical, why aren't you?

Numerous other
politicians,
judges, legal scholars,
and attorneys
also question at
least some aspects of the government's version of 9/11.

Views: 38

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Shallel Octavia on September 9, 2010 at 7:32pm
This page allows you to change colors and themes: http://customningthemes.ning.com/?xp_search=customizing+colors&...
Comment by James H. Fetzer on September 9, 2010 at 4:56pm
Can anyone tell me why some of my posts turn out to be almost impossible to read with this black background?

© 2019   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service