Steven St. John: 9/11: Another Look

[James H. Fetzer]

NOTE from Jack White, who forwarded this to me and others on a list: Steven St. John is a NYC 911 researcher who was only a block or so from ground zero, and has been an active researcher pursuing possible Israeli involvement. He worked in a government office near the twin towers and saw the explosions and the falling towers. His boss died in the attack. He sends me his articles frequently. Here is one received today.

...........

9/11: Another Look

But this time, by a UN 9/11 Commission!

As leaders from around the world plan to converge on United Nations Headquarters in New York City to open the new General Assembly on 23 September 2009, they should consider the establishment of a 9/11 International Independent Investigation Commission.

The precedent for such an investigation was set at the insistence of the USA in its rush to judgment after the assassination of Lebanon’s former Prime Minister, Rafiq Hariri, on 14 February 2005. Inasmuch as 9/11 served as a justification for invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, surely the terrible events of that day should not remain a mystery. Nor should an apparent 9/11 cover-up outlast the occupations.

The 9/11 Commission Cochairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton have admitted they were “set up to fail.” Commissioner Max Cleland quit in disgust over Bush Administration stonewalling. The 9/11 Commission Report, issued on 22 July 2004, is riddled with distortions and omissions. The National Institute of Standards & Technology failed to give the World Trade Center dust proper chemical analysis.

And so the 6 April 2009 announcement by University of Copenhagen Professor of Chemistry Niels Harrit that military grade nanothermitic high explosive particles were found in dust samples provided by four residents living near ground zero at the World Trade Center has energized the quest for a real investigation, albeit mainly on the Internet.

Surely a man in a cave or tent in Afghanistan did not have access to the Twin Towers and the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) to place these explosives; yet these buildings dropped at near free fall speed and in perfect accord with all other known characteristics of controlled demolitions. So who placed the charges? Who was at the ready to set them off after two of the three buildings had been hit by jets?

But even hard evidence uncovered by meticulous scientific research has met resistance. Harrit’s team’s work could have been and should have been done by the proper authorities within hours of the attacks. Yet a conspiracy of silence still reigns supreme four months after his announcement and publication of Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.

The upshot finally came in President Obama’s 4 June 2009 speech at the University of Cairo, where he declared, “I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day."

Let me be clear. There is no way I can justify 9/11. But I simply do not believe the official story told in the 9/11 Commission Report. Conflating skepticism with justification of the events of 9/11 seems like a desperate attempt at a sound bite to stifle debate. And so it is time for the United Nations to take the USA by the hand and help President Obama to confront the awful bogeyman who has been exercising the military industrial complex so well.

I believe our nation is in moral and spiritual jeopardy when we watch 9/11 passengers and hijackers on the Silver Screen but cannot see any credible video surveillance images of any of the real passengers and alleged hijackers at any of the three high security airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed. Millions if not billions of people were hoodwinked into believing a video of two alleged hijackers passing through a metal detector at Portland Maine International Airport was from Logan Airport in Boston. The CCTV at Dulles has no time indicator and, subject to verification in a proper discovery process, shows background shadows cast from a direction where the sun does not shine. A jury would relish such details.

High tech nanothermitic explosives at the targets and routine video surveillance tapes gone missing at the airports are just the tip of the iceberg representing many known unknowns about 9/11. Here are two more examples:

Two aerial vehicles – the one that hit the south tower WTC 2 and the one that hit the Pentagon – had trajectories more like those of jet fighters or guided missiles than heavy commercial jets piloted by flight students on their maiden voyages. Infiltration of government computer systems for the purposes of monitoring and surreptitiously intervening in operations offers a logical explanation for such a successful operation by remote control right in the middle of multiple NORAD war games and exercises.

Stories of cell and air phone calls from the hijacked jets are doubtful at best; impersonations conducted with high-tech real-time digital voice morphing offer the most rational explanation for the calls that were received. Edward Felt’s cell phone call from the lavatory of United Airlines Flight 93 was technically impossible to make, and here the FBI could not fudge facts because toilets on commercial jets do not have air phones.

Standard investigative practice includes careful consideration of those who had motive, means and opportunity. Zionists were hell-bent on putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, and a classic false flag military intelligence operation to provide a pretext for invasions and occupations was their ticket to success. Benjamin Netanyahu more than once has stated that 9/11 was “good for Israel”; why, then, were his Zionist buddies, led by master myth-maker Philip Zelikow, conducting the faulty 9/11 investigations? Why did Mayor Bloomberg play down testimonies of explosions inside the Twin Towers and his place of business, the Salomon Brothers Building, WTC 7? In September 2000, Dov Zakheim touted a “new Pearl Harbor” as a way to advance the imperial ambitions of fellow neoconservatives; why, then, was he not examined because of his boundless influence over the command, control, communications and inventories of our nation’s armed forces? Ex-Judge Michael B. Mukasey became Attorney General probably because he knows better than anyone else why Larry Silverstein’s WTC insurers are the dogs that did not bark at the supposed intruder in the night. Etc. etc..

My hypothesis that Zionists formed the nucleus of an inside job on 9/11 needs to be tested. Charges of “anti-Semitism” ought not to preclude scrutiny in this matter; indeed, one happy outcome of a real 9/11 investigation may well be a cessation of the shedding of the blood of Abraham in the Middle East.

On 27 April 1961 JFK made a speech at the Waldorf Astoria which touched on the powerful influence of secret societies. Just weeks before his assassination in Dallas on 22 November 1963, the McClellan Committee was hearing testimony from Joe Valachi about an organization whose very existence FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover denied. This is when the Mafioso code of silence, omertà, became known in virtually every household in the USA. Now it is time for the international community to grapple with a similar code of silence, the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This law stymied both the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission. It is a sure foundation for a conspiracy of silence to obstruct justice. This is a global problem in need of a global solution.

Pursuing justice is a very noble endeavor which often brings collateral benefits of high value. In the case of 9/11, knowing exactly how the USA found its way into Afghanistan and Iraq is prerequisite to knowing how to bring all the troops and mercenaries home.

© Stephen M. St. John 2009

http://www.show-the-house.com/