9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Vancouver Hearings—Evidentiary Submission #4 of 5 by James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Vancouver Hearings—Evidentiary Submission #4 of 5 by James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

 

At the Vancouver Hearings, held 15-17 June 2012, judges asked participants to write an evidentiary submission of at least two persons regarding their complicity in the 9/11 plot.

 

I submit the names of Philip Zelikow, Richard B. Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, and Lt. Col. Steve O’Brien, MANG, based upon the facts as noted and sourced below.

 

Name: George W. Bush

 

Title at the Time of his Offense:  President of the United States

 

Probable Cause:  In his capacity as President of the United States, George W. Bush participated in planning the occurrence of and made false claims about the events of 9/11 to conceal their origins, an especially revealing example of which is a statement he made implicating himself.  On 4 December 2001, in Orlando, FL, he said the following about his visit to Booker Elementary School on 9/11:1

 

     “I was sitting outside the classroom, waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower. You   

      know, the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly myself.  And I said to myself, ‘Well, there's

      one terrible pilot.’ It must have been a terrible accident.”2

                                                                                              

The alleged first hit on the North Tower took place at 8:46 AM/ET to be followed by the alleged second on the South Tower at 9:03 AM/ET.3  Bush’s motorcade had left the Colony Beach and Tennis Resort to head to Booker at 8:35 AM/ET.4 He arrived there at 8:55 AM/ET.5 Bush was told of the second hit at 9:06 AM/ET.6

Once he learned there had been two attacks, there was no rational justification to think the first had been “an accident”. Bush and Condoleezza Rice would initially feign that of the first hit, but they could not possibly have known.7 And he cannot have seen the Naudet video, which would not be broadcast until 1 AM/ET, 9/12.8

 

(a)  An effort has been made to dismiss Bush’s remark about having seen the    

          first hit “on television” as having been a mistake;9

    

(b) but he would repeat the same story during a town meeting in Ontario, CA, 

          5 January 2002, including having viewed it on TV;10       

     

(c) a National Geographic Special that almost certainly included his recitation

          of his television viewing experience has been pulled;11 and,

    

(d) another—which is an obvious attempt to revise history--has been made

          available instead, where he recounts his story very differently:12

 

     “I had been notified that a plane had hit the WTC.  At first I thought it was a light aircraft.  And  

      my reaction was, ‘Man, either the weather was bad or something extraordinary happened to  

      the pilot’. I then informed some of my staff members to provide help to New York City—   

      whatever help was needed--and walked into the classroom”.

 

SUMMARY:  President George W. Bush committed a gaffe when he spoke about his experiences on 9/11, candidly revealing that he had seen the first hit on TV, which has to have occurred while his motorcade was en route between Colony Beach and Tennis Resort and Booker Elementary School.  This means that the Secret Service had a television camera focused on the North Tower when only those involved in planning the events of 9/11 would have had reason to watch the side of WTC-1. He could not have seen the hit on TV any other way.  Eager to convey the impression he thought it was “an accident”, he revealed too much.

 

Removing “George W. Bush: The 9/11 Interview” and the substitution of another in which he contradicts his previous reports displays consciousness of guilt and the desire to tamper with evidence. But it was a risk that had to be run, because his having watched the first hit on Secret Service television was such an obvious indication of governmental complicity in 9/11.  Given our other findings, such as:

 

     (1) the fabrication of the four “crash sites” (see Evidentiary Submission #1); 

     (2) the failure to prove any of the “hijackers” were aboard any of the planes;13

     (3) the faking of the phone calls alleged to have been made from the planes;14

 

and further forms of proof,15 it becomes increasingly apparent that the atrocities of 9/11 was a national security event that was approved at the highest levels of the American government, including The White House, NSA, CIA, Joint Chiefs and Department of Defense, where even the president appears to have been an accessory to the crime and to have committed treason against the United States.



3 THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT (2004), for example, p. 285

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

11 “George W. Bush: The 9/11 Interview” (NO LONGER AVAILABLE)

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/george-w-bush-the-9-11-interview/

Views: 50

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

© 2017   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service