9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

DUST part 1: https://www.box.com/shared/9duecajohk

DUST part 2: https://www.box.com/shared/h81kjfkvg9

DUST part 3: https://www.box.com/shared/td6593g25y

I came across this from my website, but couldn't find it in our archives. Sorry if it's a double post, but I figure at least the new people will find it useful.  Part 2 explains how shock waves from underground nukes traveled up the towers to the top and were reflected back down the towers, pulverizing everything on the way back down and looking like it was top-down.  Author/physicist

Jeff Prager

described the wave as being similar to standing waves in a radio or TV transmission line. If this theory is correct, it sure answers

a lot of questions.  The shock wave might explain what happened to all of the bolts.  I wonder if all the lead batteries at the top of

the towers had anything to do with the wave reflections?  Lead will definitely affect any x-rays, and you can see a huge fireball

near the top of the towers about 1 second after the low rumbling sound at the base of the towers which caused a little camera

shaking. If we can prove the use of nukes, and keep our message fairly simple ....  maybe we can avoid the confusion which

is probably turning people off.  Hollywood-style scripted show with no actual planes and the use of nukes on American citizens

should be the main points I think.  9/11 has become so complicated, a new person will have a hard time knowing where to start.

To the new members as well as the old, y'all please speak up so we can get this ball rolling.  All questions are good questions.

Below ground melted craters, radionuclides, and huge mushroom clouds should be a dead giveaway. Thank you Jeff Prager.

Views: 131

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service